舌颌正畸与唇颌正畸对男孩和女孩心理和生理结果的比较分析

R. Rathi, Vaishnavi S Kayarkar, Amol A. Verulkar, A. Mahajan, Sara R. Bhurani, A. Padmanaban
{"title":"舌颌正畸与唇颌正畸对男孩和女孩心理和生理结果的比较分析","authors":"R. Rathi, Vaishnavi S Kayarkar, Amol A. Verulkar, A. Mahajan, Sara R. Bhurani, A. Padmanaban","doi":"10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our purpose in this systematic review is to compare the lingual Vs labial orthodontic and overview the mental and physical outcomes in young boys and girls. From 2012 to 2022, we conducted a literature search of publications that had been published in PubMed Medline, the Cochrane Library, and additional sources (Google Scholar, clinicaltrails.gov). We screened the main electronic databases. Due to the nature of the review, all sorts of studies were considered, including descriptive studies, surveys, reviews, commentaries, and editorials. In the current investigation, the recommended methodology was used to assess the risk of bias. Six distinct domains were addressed using the two-part technique. The present systematic review yielded 1500 articles on initial search; first 715 duplicate publications were removed. After screening additional 590 articles were excluded and 124 full articles were assessed for the study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of the orthodontic study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of orthodontic Curriculum comparison of lingual and labial orthodontic of patients were included in this systematic review. From the result, we can conclude that the lingual appliance group scored much higher than the buccal appliance group. During the first 2-4 weeks after lingual brackets were inserted, the majority of lingual patients saw gradual improvements in their oral impairment.","PeriodicalId":91704,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dentistry and oral health","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of lingual vs labial orthodontics on mental and physical outcomes in young boys and girls\",\"authors\":\"R. Rathi, Vaishnavi S Kayarkar, Amol A. Verulkar, A. Mahajan, Sara R. Bhurani, A. Padmanaban\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our purpose in this systematic review is to compare the lingual Vs labial orthodontic and overview the mental and physical outcomes in young boys and girls. From 2012 to 2022, we conducted a literature search of publications that had been published in PubMed Medline, the Cochrane Library, and additional sources (Google Scholar, clinicaltrails.gov). We screened the main electronic databases. Due to the nature of the review, all sorts of studies were considered, including descriptive studies, surveys, reviews, commentaries, and editorials. In the current investigation, the recommended methodology was used to assess the risk of bias. Six distinct domains were addressed using the two-part technique. The present systematic review yielded 1500 articles on initial search; first 715 duplicate publications were removed. After screening additional 590 articles were excluded and 124 full articles were assessed for the study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of the orthodontic study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of orthodontic Curriculum comparison of lingual and labial orthodontic of patients were included in this systematic review. From the result, we can conclude that the lingual appliance group scored much higher than the buccal appliance group. During the first 2-4 weeks after lingual brackets were inserted, the majority of lingual patients saw gradual improvements in their oral impairment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of dentistry and oral health\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of dentistry and oral health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dentistry and oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在这篇系统综述的目的是比较舌形和唇形正畸,并概述了年轻男孩和女孩的心理和身体结果。从2012年到2022年,我们对PubMed Medline、Cochrane图书馆和其他来源(Google Scholar、clinicaltrails.gov)上发表的出版物进行了文献检索。我们筛选了主要的电子数据库。由于这篇综述的性质,我们考虑了各种各样的研究,包括描述性研究、调查、综述、评论和社论。在目前的研究中,采用推荐的方法来评估偏倚风险。使用两部分技术处理了六个不同的领域。本系统综述初步检索结果为1500篇;前715份重复出版物被删除。筛选后,另外590篇文章被排除,124篇完整的文章被评估。14项研究集中在正畸研究的现状。本系统综述了14项关于口腔正畸现状的研究,比较了舌侧和唇侧正畸患者的课程。从结果可以看出,舌矫治器组得分远高于颊矫治器组。在插入舌托后的2-4周内,大多数舌患者的口腔损伤逐渐改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of lingual vs labial orthodontics on mental and physical outcomes in young boys and girls
Our purpose in this systematic review is to compare the lingual Vs labial orthodontic and overview the mental and physical outcomes in young boys and girls. From 2012 to 2022, we conducted a literature search of publications that had been published in PubMed Medline, the Cochrane Library, and additional sources (Google Scholar, clinicaltrails.gov). We screened the main electronic databases. Due to the nature of the review, all sorts of studies were considered, including descriptive studies, surveys, reviews, commentaries, and editorials. In the current investigation, the recommended methodology was used to assess the risk of bias. Six distinct domains were addressed using the two-part technique. The present systematic review yielded 1500 articles on initial search; first 715 duplicate publications were removed. After screening additional 590 articles were excluded and 124 full articles were assessed for the study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of the orthodontic study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of orthodontic Curriculum comparison of lingual and labial orthodontic of patients were included in this systematic review. From the result, we can conclude that the lingual appliance group scored much higher than the buccal appliance group. During the first 2-4 weeks after lingual brackets were inserted, the majority of lingual patients saw gradual improvements in their oral impairment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parental education and attitude of young adults towards their oral health - A cross-sectional study Influence of increased screen time and social- media on children’s behaviour: A pediatric dentist perspective Peripheral cementifying fibroma of the oral cavity: A case report Cost variation analysis of commonly prescribed drugs in dentistry available in the Indian market Traumatic displacement of a permanent maxillary incisor into the nasal cavity: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1