通过更好的质量控制提高固井成功率:使用世界上第一个可量化的混合水分析技术的现场案例研究

S. C. Mahavadi, Nathan Curtis, S. Taoutaou
{"title":"通过更好的质量控制提高固井成功率:使用世界上第一个可量化的混合水分析技术的现场案例研究","authors":"S. C. Mahavadi, Nathan Curtis, S. Taoutaou","doi":"10.2118/197405-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cementing is one of the most important steps in preparing a well for production. Critical parameters influencing the success of a cementing job are the concentration and the types of additives present in a mix fluid to prepare the cement slurry. However, it is extremely challenging to analyze water-soluble organics under oilfield operational conditions. In addition, with the complexity in chemistry of additives and mix fluids, it is also an analytical challenge to experimentally determine the quality of mix fluid and the slurry with standard analytical techniques such as high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) or inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP). In addition to the general business need to verify chemical addition accuracy, in the field, the current practice to prepare mix fluid entails the addition of different additives either manually or using specialized liquid additive systems (LAS). Any human error in programming the LAS or manually adding the products yielding poor or no traceability for QA/QC could fail the cement job. This warrants the need for a reliable and field-robust method of quantifying additive concentrations in the mix fluid.\n To address this challenge, we developed a workflow using electrophoresis to address this issue to support operations. Electrophoresis uses an electric field to separate and quantify the components of a single fluid or a mix-fluid additive system. More importantly, we can simultaneously detect and quantify multiple chemistries in a single run. We have developed methods to analyze and quantify all the ingredients in an aqueous fluid system. This includes organics such as surfactants, natural and synthetic polymers, organic acid, and the inorganic ions that are common in seawater and most base fluids in the additive system.\n In the first step, we developed a method to analyze a single additive. This method addressed the issue of analyzing organics in aqueous fluid and demonstrated the applicability of this technology in determining the quality of the additives in terms of contamination. In later steps, the method was expanded to analyze and quantify dispersants, multicomponent retarders, and antifoaming agents individually as well together in a single run. Our study clearly demonstrated the electrophoresis technique can quantitatively differentiate multiple additives in a mix-fluid system while simultaneously estimating their respective ratios in the system. The developed method was applied to a mix-fluid system to identify a missing additive that led to the failure of a critical job.\n Overall, a simple and reliable technique is introduced to determine the quality and composition of additives and the mix-fluid system composition to enhance the reliability of existing processes and thereby improve the success rate of cementing jobs. Examples from the field will be presented.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"494 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Cementing Success with Better QC: Field Case Studies of using a World-First Quantifiable Mix-Water Analysis Technique\",\"authors\":\"S. C. Mahavadi, Nathan Curtis, S. Taoutaou\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197405-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Cementing is one of the most important steps in preparing a well for production. Critical parameters influencing the success of a cementing job are the concentration and the types of additives present in a mix fluid to prepare the cement slurry. However, it is extremely challenging to analyze water-soluble organics under oilfield operational conditions. In addition, with the complexity in chemistry of additives and mix fluids, it is also an analytical challenge to experimentally determine the quality of mix fluid and the slurry with standard analytical techniques such as high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) or inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP). In addition to the general business need to verify chemical addition accuracy, in the field, the current practice to prepare mix fluid entails the addition of different additives either manually or using specialized liquid additive systems (LAS). Any human error in programming the LAS or manually adding the products yielding poor or no traceability for QA/QC could fail the cement job. This warrants the need for a reliable and field-robust method of quantifying additive concentrations in the mix fluid.\\n To address this challenge, we developed a workflow using electrophoresis to address this issue to support operations. Electrophoresis uses an electric field to separate and quantify the components of a single fluid or a mix-fluid additive system. More importantly, we can simultaneously detect and quantify multiple chemistries in a single run. We have developed methods to analyze and quantify all the ingredients in an aqueous fluid system. This includes organics such as surfactants, natural and synthetic polymers, organic acid, and the inorganic ions that are common in seawater and most base fluids in the additive system.\\n In the first step, we developed a method to analyze a single additive. This method addressed the issue of analyzing organics in aqueous fluid and demonstrated the applicability of this technology in determining the quality of the additives in terms of contamination. In later steps, the method was expanded to analyze and quantify dispersants, multicomponent retarders, and antifoaming agents individually as well together in a single run. Our study clearly demonstrated the electrophoresis technique can quantitatively differentiate multiple additives in a mix-fluid system while simultaneously estimating their respective ratios in the system. The developed method was applied to a mix-fluid system to identify a missing additive that led to the failure of a critical job.\\n Overall, a simple and reliable technique is introduced to determine the quality and composition of additives and the mix-fluid system composition to enhance the reliability of existing processes and thereby improve the success rate of cementing jobs. Examples from the field will be presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"volume\":\"494 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197405-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197405-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

固井是准备生产井的最重要步骤之一。影响固井作业成功的关键参数是制备水泥浆的混合液中存在的添加剂的浓度和类型。然而,在油田作业条件下分析水溶性有机物是极具挑战性的。此外,随着添加剂和混合流体化学性质的复杂性,通过高压液相色谱(HPLC)或电感耦合等离子体光谱(ICP)等标准分析技术,通过实验确定混合流体和浆液的质量也是一项分析挑战。除了一般业务需要验证化学添加的准确性外,在该领域,目前制备混合流体的做法需要手动添加不同的添加剂或使用专门的液体添加剂系统(LAS)。在编程LAS或手动添加产品时出现的任何人为错误都可能导致QA/QC的可追溯性差或没有可追溯性,从而导致固井作业失败。因此,需要一种可靠且现场可靠的方法来定量混合流体中的添加剂浓度。为了应对这一挑战,我们开发了一个使用电泳的工作流程来解决这个问题,以支持作业。电泳使用电场来分离和定量单一流体或混合流体添加剂体系的成分。更重要的是,我们可以在一次作业中同时检测和量化多种化学物质。我们已经开发了分析和量化含水流体系统中所有成分的方法。这包括有机物质,如表面活性剂,天然和合成聚合物,有机酸,以及在海水和添加剂体系中大多数基础流体中常见的无机离子。在第一步,我们开发了一种分析单一添加剂的方法。该方法解决了分析含水流体中有机物的问题,并证明了该技术在确定添加剂污染质量方面的适用性。在随后的步骤中,该方法被扩展到在一次运行中单独分析和量化分散剂、多组分缓凝剂和消泡剂。我们的研究清楚地表明,电泳技术可以定量区分混合流体系统中的多种添加剂,同时估计它们在系统中的各自比例。将该方法应用于混合流体系统,以识别导致关键作业失败的缺失添加剂。总的来说,介绍了一种简单可靠的技术来确定添加剂的质量和组成以及混合流体系统的组成,以提高现有工艺的可靠性,从而提高固井作业的成功率。将介绍该领域的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Cementing Success with Better QC: Field Case Studies of using a World-First Quantifiable Mix-Water Analysis Technique
Cementing is one of the most important steps in preparing a well for production. Critical parameters influencing the success of a cementing job are the concentration and the types of additives present in a mix fluid to prepare the cement slurry. However, it is extremely challenging to analyze water-soluble organics under oilfield operational conditions. In addition, with the complexity in chemistry of additives and mix fluids, it is also an analytical challenge to experimentally determine the quality of mix fluid and the slurry with standard analytical techniques such as high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) or inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP). In addition to the general business need to verify chemical addition accuracy, in the field, the current practice to prepare mix fluid entails the addition of different additives either manually or using specialized liquid additive systems (LAS). Any human error in programming the LAS or manually adding the products yielding poor or no traceability for QA/QC could fail the cement job. This warrants the need for a reliable and field-robust method of quantifying additive concentrations in the mix fluid. To address this challenge, we developed a workflow using electrophoresis to address this issue to support operations. Electrophoresis uses an electric field to separate and quantify the components of a single fluid or a mix-fluid additive system. More importantly, we can simultaneously detect and quantify multiple chemistries in a single run. We have developed methods to analyze and quantify all the ingredients in an aqueous fluid system. This includes organics such as surfactants, natural and synthetic polymers, organic acid, and the inorganic ions that are common in seawater and most base fluids in the additive system. In the first step, we developed a method to analyze a single additive. This method addressed the issue of analyzing organics in aqueous fluid and demonstrated the applicability of this technology in determining the quality of the additives in terms of contamination. In later steps, the method was expanded to analyze and quantify dispersants, multicomponent retarders, and antifoaming agents individually as well together in a single run. Our study clearly demonstrated the electrophoresis technique can quantitatively differentiate multiple additives in a mix-fluid system while simultaneously estimating their respective ratios in the system. The developed method was applied to a mix-fluid system to identify a missing additive that led to the failure of a critical job. Overall, a simple and reliable technique is introduced to determine the quality and composition of additives and the mix-fluid system composition to enhance the reliability of existing processes and thereby improve the success rate of cementing jobs. Examples from the field will be presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of bag-of-features (BoF) technique for weed management in sugarcane production Spraying deposits using different nozzles and application volumes for pest management of cotton at reproductive stage Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate Comedication use in Cancer and Noncancer Pain Co-Development Aspects of Super Giant Reservoirs With Condensate-Rich Gas Cap Healing Total Losses and Establishing Well Integrity with Engineered Fiber-Based Lost Circulation Control Spacer During Primary Cementing in UAE Offshore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1