健康信念模型在乳房自检中的应用:meta分析

Maranata Maranata, E. Pamungkasari, Rita Benya Adriani
{"title":"健康信念模型在乳房自检中的应用:meta分析","authors":"Maranata Maranata, E. Pamungkasari, Rita Benya Adriani","doi":"10.26911/THEJHPB.2020.05.03.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer is a type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in wo­men. BSE is an early detection method for breast can­cer. Health Belief Model is a model of health behavior that can predict women's interest in prac­ticing BSE. This study aims to estimate the Health Belief Model's effect in the practice of BSE by meta-analysis. Subjects and Method: Meta-analysis was performed by searching for articles from the Pub­Med database, Springer Link, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. The keywords used were \"health belief model,\" OR \"health belief\" OR \"belief\" AND \"breast self-examination,\" OR \"breast cancer screening.\" This study's inclu­sion criteria were full-text articles published in 2011-2020, a cross-sectional study design. Article analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: There were 12 articles in total. The results showed that perceived benefits were strong (aOR= 1.02; 95% CI= 0.94-1.11; p= 0.590; I 2 = 73%), perceived barriers were weak (aOR = 1; 95% CI= 0.95-1.05; p= 0.920; I 2 = 87%). Conclusion: Perceived benefits and perceived barriers are not statistically significant in predi­c­t­i­ng BSE practice in women. Keywords: health belief model, perceived be­ne­­­fits, perceived barriers, BSE Correspondence:  Maranata. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebe­las Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: marana­taima­@­gmail­.­com­. Mobile­: 085867548771 Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(03): 221-231 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.03.08.","PeriodicalId":16038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","volume":"151 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Health Belief Model on Breast Self-Examination: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Maranata Maranata, E. Pamungkasari, Rita Benya Adriani\",\"doi\":\"10.26911/THEJHPB.2020.05.03.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Breast cancer is a type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in wo­men. BSE is an early detection method for breast can­cer. Health Belief Model is a model of health behavior that can predict women's interest in prac­ticing BSE. This study aims to estimate the Health Belief Model's effect in the practice of BSE by meta-analysis. Subjects and Method: Meta-analysis was performed by searching for articles from the Pub­Med database, Springer Link, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. The keywords used were \\\"health belief model,\\\" OR \\\"health belief\\\" OR \\\"belief\\\" AND \\\"breast self-examination,\\\" OR \\\"breast cancer screening.\\\" This study's inclu­sion criteria were full-text articles published in 2011-2020, a cross-sectional study design. Article analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: There were 12 articles in total. The results showed that perceived benefits were strong (aOR= 1.02; 95% CI= 0.94-1.11; p= 0.590; I 2 = 73%), perceived barriers were weak (aOR = 1; 95% CI= 0.95-1.05; p= 0.920; I 2 = 87%). Conclusion: Perceived benefits and perceived barriers are not statistically significant in predi­c­t­i­ng BSE practice in women. Keywords: health belief model, perceived be­ne­­­fits, perceived barriers, BSE Correspondence:  Maranata. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebe­las Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: marana­taima­@­gmail­.­com­. Mobile­: 085867548771 Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(03): 221-231 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.03.08.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"151 5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26911/THEJHPB.2020.05.03.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/THEJHPB.2020.05.03.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:乳腺癌是一种癌症,是男性癌症死亡的主要原因。疯牛病是乳腺癌的一种早期检测方法。健康信念模型是一种健康行为模型,可以预测女性对BSE实践的兴趣。本研究旨在通过meta分析评估健康信念模型在疯牛病实践中的效果。研究对象和方法:通过检索pubm - med数据库、Springer Link、Elsevier和Google Scholar中的文章进行meta分析。使用的关键词是“健康信念模型”或“健康信念”或“信念”和“乳房自我检查”或“乳腺癌筛查”。本研究的纳入标准为2011-2020年发表的全文文章,采用横断面研究设计。文章分析采用RevMan 5.3软件。结果:共纳入文献12篇。结果显示,感知效益较强(aOR= 1.02;95% ci = 0.94-1.11;p = 0.590;i2 = 73%),感知障碍较弱(aOR = 1;95% ci = 0.95-1.05;p = 0.920;i2 = 87%)。结论:感知收益和感知障碍在预测女性BSE实践中没有统计学意义。关键词:健康信念模型,感知自适应,感知障碍,疯牛病对应,马拉纳塔西比拉斯市场大学公共卫生硕士课程。杰。红外光谱。Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126,中爪哇。电子邮件:marana-taima -@-gmail网站-。健康促进与行为杂志(2020),05(03):221-231 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.03.08。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Health Belief Model on Breast Self-Examination: A Meta-Analysis
Background: Breast cancer is a type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in wo­men. BSE is an early detection method for breast can­cer. Health Belief Model is a model of health behavior that can predict women's interest in prac­ticing BSE. This study aims to estimate the Health Belief Model's effect in the practice of BSE by meta-analysis. Subjects and Method: Meta-analysis was performed by searching for articles from the Pub­Med database, Springer Link, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. The keywords used were "health belief model," OR "health belief" OR "belief" AND "breast self-examination," OR "breast cancer screening." This study's inclu­sion criteria were full-text articles published in 2011-2020, a cross-sectional study design. Article analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: There were 12 articles in total. The results showed that perceived benefits were strong (aOR= 1.02; 95% CI= 0.94-1.11; p= 0.590; I 2 = 73%), perceived barriers were weak (aOR = 1; 95% CI= 0.95-1.05; p= 0.920; I 2 = 87%). Conclusion: Perceived benefits and perceived barriers are not statistically significant in predi­c­t­i­ng BSE practice in women. Keywords: health belief model, perceived be­ne­­­fits, perceived barriers, BSE Correspondence:  Maranata. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebe­las Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: marana­taima­@­gmail­.­com­. Mobile­: 085867548771 Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(03): 221-231 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.03.08.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated with the Occurrence of Pneumonia in Children Under Five in Tarus, Central Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara Parental Role, Social Media, Peer Support, and Their Associations on Attitude Toward Reproductive Health in Female Students in Junior High Schools, Manokwari, West Papua Comparison of the Effectiveness of Audio and VisualAudio as Health Promotion Media for Prevention of COVID-19 Transmission The Effect of Clitoria Ternatea's Drink on Insomnia in Post COVID-19 Patients The Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Text Messages on the Adherence to Antiretroviral Drug Taking in Patients Living with HIV/AIDS: A Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1