综合实时压力监测实现海上高温高压钻井成功——以南海莺歌海盆地乐东地区为例

Yongde Gao, Ming Chen, Chao Du, Shiyue Wang, Dianqiang Sun, Peng Liu, Yanyan Chen
{"title":"综合实时压力监测实现海上高温高压钻井成功——以南海莺歌海盆地乐东地区为例","authors":"Yongde Gao, Ming Chen, Chao Du, Shiyue Wang, Dianqiang Sun, Peng Liu, Yanyan Chen","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19313-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drilling in Ledong field at Yinggehai basin of South China Sea faces challenges of high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP). The high pore pressure and low fracture gradient results in a narrow mud weight window, especially when drilling close to overpressured reservoir. Well LD10-C was the first exploration well targeting at reservoirs in Meishan formation. Well LD10-A and LD10-B were offset wells in a distance of 15-20km drilled for reservoirs in Huangliu formation, which is above Meishan formation. During drilling, both wells encountered severe gas kick, mud loss and did not reach target.\n In order to drill and complete well LD10-C safely, a real-time pressure monitoring solution was introduced with integration technique of logging while drilling (LWD) and look-ahead vertical seismic profile (VSP). It helped to monitor pore pressure and fracture gradient while drilling and predicted top of the overpressured reservoir. This enabled to keep the mud weight and equivalent circulation density (ECD) within a safe margin to avoid kick and mud loss, helped to set casing as close as possible to the top of reservoir. The reservoir section was drilled with a manageable mud weight window.\n The main achievements of this task were: 1) accurately monitor and predicted pore pressure coefficient at reservoir. The predicted pore pressure coefficient was 2.25 SG versus 2.24 SG from actual measurement. 2) accurate prediction of reservoirs top. The predicted top depth of Sand C was 2m error with accuracy of 0.05%. The top depth of Sand D was 10m error with accuracy of 0.2%. 3) 12.25in section and 8.375in section was successfully drilled deeper with pressure monitoring. The 9 5/8in casing was set 491m deeper and 7in line was set 80m deeper than plan. As a result, well LD10-C was drilled and competed without any drilling complexities.\n This was first application of LWD and VSP together for pressure monitoring while drilling in Yinggehai basin. The successful completion of well LD10-C confirmed that this integrated solution was an efficient technique to predict and reduce drilling risks, optimize mud weight and casing diagram, improve operational safety and save cost in HTHP offshore drilling.","PeriodicalId":11267,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","volume":"199 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Real-Time Pressure Monitoring Enabled the Success of Drilling a HTHP Offshore Well: A Casing Study in Ledong Area of Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea\",\"authors\":\"Yongde Gao, Ming Chen, Chao Du, Shiyue Wang, Dianqiang Sun, Peng Liu, Yanyan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/IPTC-19313-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Drilling in Ledong field at Yinggehai basin of South China Sea faces challenges of high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP). The high pore pressure and low fracture gradient results in a narrow mud weight window, especially when drilling close to overpressured reservoir. Well LD10-C was the first exploration well targeting at reservoirs in Meishan formation. Well LD10-A and LD10-B were offset wells in a distance of 15-20km drilled for reservoirs in Huangliu formation, which is above Meishan formation. During drilling, both wells encountered severe gas kick, mud loss and did not reach target.\\n In order to drill and complete well LD10-C safely, a real-time pressure monitoring solution was introduced with integration technique of logging while drilling (LWD) and look-ahead vertical seismic profile (VSP). It helped to monitor pore pressure and fracture gradient while drilling and predicted top of the overpressured reservoir. This enabled to keep the mud weight and equivalent circulation density (ECD) within a safe margin to avoid kick and mud loss, helped to set casing as close as possible to the top of reservoir. The reservoir section was drilled with a manageable mud weight window.\\n The main achievements of this task were: 1) accurately monitor and predicted pore pressure coefficient at reservoir. The predicted pore pressure coefficient was 2.25 SG versus 2.24 SG from actual measurement. 2) accurate prediction of reservoirs top. The predicted top depth of Sand C was 2m error with accuracy of 0.05%. The top depth of Sand D was 10m error with accuracy of 0.2%. 3) 12.25in section and 8.375in section was successfully drilled deeper with pressure monitoring. The 9 5/8in casing was set 491m deeper and 7in line was set 80m deeper than plan. As a result, well LD10-C was drilled and competed without any drilling complexities.\\n This was first application of LWD and VSP together for pressure monitoring while drilling in Yinggehai basin. The successful completion of well LD10-C confirmed that this integrated solution was an efficient technique to predict and reduce drilling risks, optimize mud weight and casing diagram, improve operational safety and save cost in HTHP offshore drilling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"volume\":\"199 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19313-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19313-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

南海莺歌海盆地乐东油田钻井面临高温高压挑战。高孔隙压力和低裂缝梯度导致泥浆比重窗口窄,特别是在超压油藏附近钻井时。LD10-C井是第一口针对梅山组储层的勘探井。LD10-A井和LD10-B井为梅山组以上黄柳组储层井距15 ~ 20km的邻井。在钻井过程中,两口井都遇到了严重的气涌、泥浆漏失,未能达到目标。为了保证LD10-C井的安全钻完井,采用随钻测井(LWD)和垂直地震剖面(VSP)技术相结合的实时压力监测方案。在钻井过程中监测孔隙压力和裂缝梯度,预测超压储层顶部。这使得泥浆重量和当量循环密度(ECD)保持在安全范围内,以避免井涌和泥浆漏失,有助于将套管尽可能靠近储层顶部。在可控制的泥浆比重窗口下,对储层段进行了钻井。主要成果有:1)准确监测和预测储层孔隙压力系数。预测孔隙压力系数为2.25 SG,实际测量值为2.24 SG。2)准确预测储层顶部。预测C砂顶深误差为2m,精度为0.05%。D砂顶深误差10m,精度0.2%。3) 12.25in段和8.375in段在压力监测下成功钻深。9 5/8in套管下入深度比计划深491m, 7in管柱下入深度比计划深80m。因此,LD10-C井在没有任何钻井复杂性的情况下完成了钻井和竞争。这是在莺歌海盆地首次将随钻测井和VSP同时应用于钻井压力监测。LD10-C井的成功完井证实了该综合解决方案是预测和降低钻井风险、优化泥浆比重和套管图、提高作业安全性和节省高温高压海上钻井成本的有效技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrated Real-Time Pressure Monitoring Enabled the Success of Drilling a HTHP Offshore Well: A Casing Study in Ledong Area of Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea
Drilling in Ledong field at Yinggehai basin of South China Sea faces challenges of high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP). The high pore pressure and low fracture gradient results in a narrow mud weight window, especially when drilling close to overpressured reservoir. Well LD10-C was the first exploration well targeting at reservoirs in Meishan formation. Well LD10-A and LD10-B were offset wells in a distance of 15-20km drilled for reservoirs in Huangliu formation, which is above Meishan formation. During drilling, both wells encountered severe gas kick, mud loss and did not reach target. In order to drill and complete well LD10-C safely, a real-time pressure monitoring solution was introduced with integration technique of logging while drilling (LWD) and look-ahead vertical seismic profile (VSP). It helped to monitor pore pressure and fracture gradient while drilling and predicted top of the overpressured reservoir. This enabled to keep the mud weight and equivalent circulation density (ECD) within a safe margin to avoid kick and mud loss, helped to set casing as close as possible to the top of reservoir. The reservoir section was drilled with a manageable mud weight window. The main achievements of this task were: 1) accurately monitor and predicted pore pressure coefficient at reservoir. The predicted pore pressure coefficient was 2.25 SG versus 2.24 SG from actual measurement. 2) accurate prediction of reservoirs top. The predicted top depth of Sand C was 2m error with accuracy of 0.05%. The top depth of Sand D was 10m error with accuracy of 0.2%. 3) 12.25in section and 8.375in section was successfully drilled deeper with pressure monitoring. The 9 5/8in casing was set 491m deeper and 7in line was set 80m deeper than plan. As a result, well LD10-C was drilled and competed without any drilling complexities. This was first application of LWD and VSP together for pressure monitoring while drilling in Yinggehai basin. The successful completion of well LD10-C confirmed that this integrated solution was an efficient technique to predict and reduce drilling risks, optimize mud weight and casing diagram, improve operational safety and save cost in HTHP offshore drilling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Modified Plane of Weakness Method Enables Drilling Horizontal Wells Successfully in Ordos Basin, China A Practical Method to Match Trajectories of a Horizontal Well in Time Domain and in Depth in Ancient Buried Hill 3D Permeability Characterization Based on Pore Structure Analysis and Multi-Parameters Seismic Inversion and Its Application in H Oilfield Research and Application on Intensive Drilling Model of Large Platforms Disclose Hidden Hydrocarbon HC Reserves from Additional Zone of Interest AZIs Using dT LogR Method in Lunar Field, Gulf of Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1