具体的和模糊的:我们对最早的塞琉古国王的铜币类型的皇室意识形态能说些什么?

IF 0.4 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI:10.1515/jah-2022-0014
Jenny Parr Shearer
{"title":"具体的和模糊的:我们对最早的塞琉古国王的铜币类型的皇室意识形态能说些什么?","authors":"Jenny Parr Shearer","doi":"10.1515/jah-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues that the bronze coin types of the earliest Seleucid kings clearly illustrate the royal ideology of Seleucus I and his co-rulership with Antiochus I. This article considers the audience and meaning of the bronzes, as well as their minting patterns. After a discussion of the obverse and reverse types, this article focuses on two images: that of the bull and the anchor. The bull being both highly produced, and open to interpretation, and the anchor being a symbol more personal and specific to Seleucus I. This article then goes on to put forward that the bull/anchor types produced at Aï Khanoum/Bactra were a deliberate link on the part of Antiochus to the types produced by Seleucus I to create an imperial image.","PeriodicalId":41459,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology","volume":"209 1","pages":"76 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The specific and the ambiguous: what can we say of royal ideology of bronze coin types of the earliest Seleucid kings?\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Parr Shearer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jah-2022-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article argues that the bronze coin types of the earliest Seleucid kings clearly illustrate the royal ideology of Seleucus I and his co-rulership with Antiochus I. This article considers the audience and meaning of the bronzes, as well as their minting patterns. After a discussion of the obverse and reverse types, this article focuses on two images: that of the bull and the anchor. The bull being both highly produced, and open to interpretation, and the anchor being a symbol more personal and specific to Seleucus I. This article then goes on to put forward that the bull/anchor types produced at Aï Khanoum/Bactra were a deliberate link on the part of Antiochus to the types produced by Seleucus I to create an imperial image.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"209 1\",\"pages\":\"76 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2022-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,最早的塞琉古国王的铜币类型清楚地说明了塞琉古一世及其与安条克一世的共同统治的王室意识形态。本文考虑了青铜器的受众和意义,以及它们的铸造模式。在讨论了正反两种类型之后,本文重点讨论了公牛和锚的两种形象。公牛是高度生产的,并且可以解释,而锚则是塞琉古一世更个人和特定的象征。这篇文章接着提出,Aï Khanoum/Bactra生产的公牛/锚类型是安条克故意将塞琉古一世生产的类型联系起来,以创造一个帝国形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The specific and the ambiguous: what can we say of royal ideology of bronze coin types of the earliest Seleucid kings?
Abstract This article argues that the bronze coin types of the earliest Seleucid kings clearly illustrate the royal ideology of Seleucus I and his co-rulership with Antiochus I. This article considers the audience and meaning of the bronzes, as well as their minting patterns. After a discussion of the obverse and reverse types, this article focuses on two images: that of the bull and the anchor. The bull being both highly produced, and open to interpretation, and the anchor being a symbol more personal and specific to Seleucus I. This article then goes on to put forward that the bull/anchor types produced at Aï Khanoum/Bactra were a deliberate link on the part of Antiochus to the types produced by Seleucus I to create an imperial image.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Animals as Offerings: Faunal Remains from the Carthage tophet Uniformity in Tophet Ceramics? The Amulets from the Carthaginian tophet In Memory of Lawrence E. Stager and “Archaeology and History” Aspar and Apollonius–religion and politics in choosing the eastern consul for 460 CE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1