从失败中学习:战败如何在战时塑造联盟动态

IF 1.3 2区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI:10.1080/01402390.2022.2030716

Sara Bjerg Moller

{"title":"从失败中学习:战败如何在战时塑造联盟动态","authors":"Sara Bjerg Moller","doi":"10.1080/01402390.2022.2030716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When and why do coalitions adapt in wartime? Drawing on insights from organizational research and bargaining theories of war, this paper develops a model of coalitional military adaptation. I argue that coalition members are slow to adjust their wartime fighting arrangements owing to collective action problems as well as the military and political practicalities inherent in coalition warfare. I illustrate my argument with a case study of the Austro-German coalition in World War I.","PeriodicalId":47240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Studies","volume":"104 1","pages":"280 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning from losing: How defeat shapes coalition dynamics in wartime\",\"authors\":\"Sara Bjerg Moller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01402390.2022.2030716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT When and why do coalitions adapt in wartime? Drawing on insights from organizational research and bargaining theories of war, this paper develops a model of coalitional military adaptation. I argue that coalition members are slow to adjust their wartime fighting arrangements owing to collective action problems as well as the military and political practicalities inherent in coalition warfare. I illustrate my argument with a case study of the Austro-German coalition in World War I.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strategic Studies\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"280 - 302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strategic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2030716\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2030716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

何时以及为什么联盟在战时进行调整?利用组织研究和战争讨价还价理论的见解，本文开发了一个联盟军事适应模型。我认为，由于集体行动问题以及联合战争固有的军事和政治现实问题，联盟成员在调整战时作战安排方面行动迟缓。我以第一次世界大战中奥德联盟的一个案例来说明我的观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Learning from losing: How defeat shapes coalition dynamics in wartime

ABSTRACT When and why do coalitions adapt in wartime? Drawing on insights from organizational research and bargaining theories of war, this paper develops a model of coalitional military adaptation. I argue that coalition members are slow to adjust their wartime fighting arrangements owing to collective action problems as well as the military and political practicalities inherent in coalition warfare. I illustrate my argument with a case study of the Austro-German coalition in World War I.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Strategic Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The defining feature of The Journal of Strategic Studies is its commitment to multi-disciplinary approach. The editors welcome articles that challenge our historical understanding of man"s efforts to achieve political ends through the application of military and diplomatic means; articles on contemporary security and theoretical controversies of enduring value; and of course articles that explicitly combine the historical and theoretical approaches to the study of modern warfare, defence policy and modern strategy. In addition to a well-established review section, The Journal of Strategic Studies offers its diverse readership a wide range of "special issues" and "special sections".