不同社会经济群体的绿色空间分布:对印度布巴内斯瓦尔的研究

IF 0.6 0 ARCHITECTURE Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.3846/jau.2023.17026
Monalipa Dash, Manjari Chakraborty
{"title":"不同社会经济群体的绿色空间分布:对印度布巴内斯瓦尔的研究","authors":"Monalipa Dash, Manjari Chakraborty","doi":"10.3846/jau.2023.17026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban green spaces (UGS) are linked with numerous health benefits. However, recent studies have highlighted an increased level of disparity in their distribution across different socio-economic groups. Adequate number of UGS and their size play an important role to achieve spatial equity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the availability of UGS across all socio-economic groups of Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India. Methods: The socio-economic groups are created by using the ward level socio-economic census data of Bhubaneswar and and PCA method of analysis. The UGS are identified using satellite images if they fulfil the criteria such as: named as a park or garden and has a definitive boundary in the year 2021. A one-way ANOVA is used for the analysis. Result: The study revealed a non-uniform distribution; 27 out of 67 wards do not have any form of parks in their vicinity. From the equity point of view, the UGS distribution is examined for parks and overall UGS. There is no major difference found in terms of availability of parks in different SES statistically. However, park area average is observed to be the higher in middle deprived communities (26738.32 m2/neighborhood) followed by least deprived communities (22386.7378 m2/neighborhood) but the average number of parks seem to be the lowest in the least deprived communities (1 park/neighborhood). The land allocation per capita for overall UGS came to be the highest for the most deprived neighborhoods (0.0146 km2/1000 population). The bigger UGS are in the most deprived wards probably because there is availability of land and low population density.","PeriodicalId":53978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DISTRIBUTION OF GREEN SPACES ACROSS SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROUPS: A STUDY OF BHUBANESWAR, INDIA\",\"authors\":\"Monalipa Dash, Manjari Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/jau.2023.17026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urban green spaces (UGS) are linked with numerous health benefits. However, recent studies have highlighted an increased level of disparity in their distribution across different socio-economic groups. Adequate number of UGS and their size play an important role to achieve spatial equity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the availability of UGS across all socio-economic groups of Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India. Methods: The socio-economic groups are created by using the ward level socio-economic census data of Bhubaneswar and and PCA method of analysis. The UGS are identified using satellite images if they fulfil the criteria such as: named as a park or garden and has a definitive boundary in the year 2021. A one-way ANOVA is used for the analysis. Result: The study revealed a non-uniform distribution; 27 out of 67 wards do not have any form of parks in their vicinity. From the equity point of view, the UGS distribution is examined for parks and overall UGS. There is no major difference found in terms of availability of parks in different SES statistically. However, park area average is observed to be the higher in middle deprived communities (26738.32 m2/neighborhood) followed by least deprived communities (22386.7378 m2/neighborhood) but the average number of parks seem to be the lowest in the least deprived communities (1 park/neighborhood). The land allocation per capita for overall UGS came to be the highest for the most deprived neighborhoods (0.0146 km2/1000 population). The bigger UGS are in the most deprived wards probably because there is availability of land and low population density.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2023.17026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2023.17026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市绿地(UGS)与许多健康益处有关。然而,最近的研究突出表明,在不同社会经济群体之间的分配差距越来越大。足够的UGS数量和规模对实现空间公平起着重要作用。本研究的目的是分析印度奥里萨邦布巴内斯瓦尔所有社会经济群体中UGS的可用性。方法:利用布巴内斯瓦尔省区级社会经济普查数据和主成分分析法,建立社会经济群体。如果UGS符合以下标准:命名为公园或花园,并在2021年有明确的边界,则使用卫星图像识别UGS。单因素方差分析用于分析。结果:研究显示非均匀分布;67个区中有27个附近没有任何形式的公园。从公平的角度来看,UGS分布对公园和整体UGS进行了检查。不同社会经济体系的公园可用性没有统计学差异。然而,中等贫困社区的平均公园面积最高(26738.32 m2/个街区),其次是最贫困社区(22386.7378 m2/个街区),但最贫困社区的平均公园数量最少(1个公园/个街区)。最贫困社区的人均土地分配最高(0.0146 km2/1000人)。较大的UGS位于最贫困的地区,可能是因为那里的土地可用性和人口密度低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DISTRIBUTION OF GREEN SPACES ACROSS SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROUPS: A STUDY OF BHUBANESWAR, INDIA
Urban green spaces (UGS) are linked with numerous health benefits. However, recent studies have highlighted an increased level of disparity in their distribution across different socio-economic groups. Adequate number of UGS and their size play an important role to achieve spatial equity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the availability of UGS across all socio-economic groups of Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India. Methods: The socio-economic groups are created by using the ward level socio-economic census data of Bhubaneswar and and PCA method of analysis. The UGS are identified using satellite images if they fulfil the criteria such as: named as a park or garden and has a definitive boundary in the year 2021. A one-way ANOVA is used for the analysis. Result: The study revealed a non-uniform distribution; 27 out of 67 wards do not have any form of parks in their vicinity. From the equity point of view, the UGS distribution is examined for parks and overall UGS. There is no major difference found in terms of availability of parks in different SES statistically. However, park area average is observed to be the higher in middle deprived communities (26738.32 m2/neighborhood) followed by least deprived communities (22386.7378 m2/neighborhood) but the average number of parks seem to be the lowest in the least deprived communities (1 park/neighborhood). The land allocation per capita for overall UGS came to be the highest for the most deprived neighborhoods (0.0146 km2/1000 population). The bigger UGS are in the most deprived wards probably because there is availability of land and low population density.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Architecture and Urbanism publishes original research on all aspects of urban architecture.
期刊最新文献
A CITY SHAPED BY MODERNIST ARCHITECTURE: SÜMERBANK TEXTILE (COTTON) PRINTING FACTORY AND ITS WORKER SETTLEMENTS THE DIVIDED BRAIN AND WAYS OF BUILDING THE WORLD: PARALLELS IN THE THOUGHT OF IAIN MCGILCHRIST AND CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER THE IMPACT OF MATERIAL AND CRAFTING TECHNOLOGY ON THE SHAPING AND DESIGN OF WROUGHT IRON ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS READING THE PAST: ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF PREVALENT PANDEMICS ON CITIES THE LOST OF OLD DEMAK SULTANATE CITY PATTERN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1