数字供应链成熟度模型的文献综述

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14488/BJOPM.2021.022
Frauke Hellweg, Sandra Lechtenberg, B. Hellingrath, A. M. T. Thomé
{"title":"数字供应链成熟度模型的文献综述","authors":"Frauke Hellweg, Sandra Lechtenberg, B. Hellingrath, A. M. T. Thomé","doi":"10.14488/BJOPM.2021.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal: Today, digital technologies have significant effects on supply chains as companies explore and exploit their opportunities. Digital supply chains promise advantages over traditional ones. A maturity model is a helpful tool to assess the current state of digitalization in supply chains and to guide companies towards implementation. The main goal of this paper is to investigate existing maturity models for digital supply chains and propose possibilities for future research. Design / Methodology / Approach: A structured literature review is conducted to identify relevant maturity models. Those are analyzed regarding their type and emphasis on a specific supply chain function or certain digitalization dimension. Results: Twenty-eight maturity models are identified. Each of them focuses on a particular supply chain function or a specific digital technology. A focus on manufacturing (Industry 4.0) and, consequently, a lack of research regarding other aspects of the supply chain digitalization becomes evident. Moreover, most papers lack coverage of all digitalization dimensions. Besides, more rigorous research regarding the quality of the maturity models, their evaluation, and application is needed. Limitations of the investigation: The conducted review is limited to two databases (Scopus and Web of Science). Two researchers conducted the analysis, which might lead to some bias. Furthermore, the analysis could be broadened and performed more in-depth to derive further insights. Practical implications: Practitioners might use the presented overview of existing maturity models to identify a well-developed one that fits their desired application scenario. Originality / Value: This paper provides suggestions for future research and highlights interesting and relevant topics to investigate.","PeriodicalId":54139,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature review on maturity models for digital supply chains\",\"authors\":\"Frauke Hellweg, Sandra Lechtenberg, B. Hellingrath, A. M. T. Thomé\",\"doi\":\"10.14488/BJOPM.2021.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goal: Today, digital technologies have significant effects on supply chains as companies explore and exploit their opportunities. Digital supply chains promise advantages over traditional ones. A maturity model is a helpful tool to assess the current state of digitalization in supply chains and to guide companies towards implementation. The main goal of this paper is to investigate existing maturity models for digital supply chains and propose possibilities for future research. Design / Methodology / Approach: A structured literature review is conducted to identify relevant maturity models. Those are analyzed regarding their type and emphasis on a specific supply chain function or certain digitalization dimension. Results: Twenty-eight maturity models are identified. Each of them focuses on a particular supply chain function or a specific digital technology. A focus on manufacturing (Industry 4.0) and, consequently, a lack of research regarding other aspects of the supply chain digitalization becomes evident. Moreover, most papers lack coverage of all digitalization dimensions. Besides, more rigorous research regarding the quality of the maturity models, their evaluation, and application is needed. Limitations of the investigation: The conducted review is limited to two databases (Scopus and Web of Science). Two researchers conducted the analysis, which might lead to some bias. Furthermore, the analysis could be broadened and performed more in-depth to derive further insights. Practical implications: Practitioners might use the presented overview of existing maturity models to identify a well-developed one that fits their desired application scenario. Originality / Value: This paper provides suggestions for future research and highlights interesting and relevant topics to investigate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目标:今天,随着企业探索和利用机会,数字技术对供应链产生了重大影响。数字供应链比传统供应链更有优势。成熟度模型是评估供应链数字化现状并指导企业实施的有用工具。本文的主要目的是研究现有的数字供应链成熟度模型,并提出未来研究的可能性。设计/方法/途径:进行结构化的文献综述,以确定相关的成熟度模型。根据其类型和对特定供应链功能或某些数字化维度的强调进行分析。结果:确定了28个成熟度模型。他们每个人都专注于一个特定的供应链功能或一个特定的数字技术。关注制造业(工业4.0),因此缺乏对供应链数字化其他方面的研究变得明显。此外,大多数论文缺乏对所有数字化维度的覆盖。此外,还需要对成熟度模型的质量、评价和应用进行更严格的研究。调查的局限性:所进行的综述仅限于两个数据库(Scopus和Web of Science)。两名研究人员进行了分析,这可能会导致一些偏见。此外,可以扩大分析范围并进行更深入的分析,以获得进一步的见解。实际含义:从业者可能会使用所提供的现有成熟度模型的概述来确定适合他们期望的应用程序场景的开发良好的模型。原创性/价值:本文为未来的研究提供了建议,并突出了有趣和相关的研究主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literature review on maturity models for digital supply chains
Goal: Today, digital technologies have significant effects on supply chains as companies explore and exploit their opportunities. Digital supply chains promise advantages over traditional ones. A maturity model is a helpful tool to assess the current state of digitalization in supply chains and to guide companies towards implementation. The main goal of this paper is to investigate existing maturity models for digital supply chains and propose possibilities for future research. Design / Methodology / Approach: A structured literature review is conducted to identify relevant maturity models. Those are analyzed regarding their type and emphasis on a specific supply chain function or certain digitalization dimension. Results: Twenty-eight maturity models are identified. Each of them focuses on a particular supply chain function or a specific digital technology. A focus on manufacturing (Industry 4.0) and, consequently, a lack of research regarding other aspects of the supply chain digitalization becomes evident. Moreover, most papers lack coverage of all digitalization dimensions. Besides, more rigorous research regarding the quality of the maturity models, their evaluation, and application is needed. Limitations of the investigation: The conducted review is limited to two databases (Scopus and Web of Science). Two researchers conducted the analysis, which might lead to some bias. Furthermore, the analysis could be broadened and performed more in-depth to derive further insights. Practical implications: Practitioners might use the presented overview of existing maturity models to identify a well-developed one that fits their desired application scenario. Originality / Value: This paper provides suggestions for future research and highlights interesting and relevant topics to investigate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and Operational Excellence opportunities with Industry 4.0, Lean and Circular Economy Analysis of the application of recycled polypropylene Productivity in a pandemic Analysis of product-service system logistics strategies in e-commerce An ERP implementation on a beekeeping and honey value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1