对因素动量的重新审视:它有多强?

IF 2.6 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE FINANCIAL REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI:10.1111/fire.12300
Minyou Fan, Youwei Li, Ming Liao, Jiadong Liu
{"title":"对因素动量的重新审视:它有多强?","authors":"Minyou Fan,&nbsp;Youwei Li,&nbsp;Ming Liao,&nbsp;Jiadong Liu","doi":"10.1111/fire.12300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent studies show that most financial market anomalies exhibit a momentum effect. Based on two datasets, (i) an original 22-factor sample and (ii) a more comprehensive 187-factor sample, we find that factor momentum effect is weak at the individual factor level. In both samples, only about 22%– 27% of the factors exhibit strong return continuation and dominate the factor momentum portfolio while the remaining factors do not. The factor momentum strategies do not outperform the corresponding long-only strategies in either sample. The choice of factors affects the ability of factor momentum to explain individual stock momentum.</p>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"57 3","pages":"585-615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fire.12300","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reexamination of factor momentum: How strong is it?\",\"authors\":\"Minyou Fan,&nbsp;Youwei Li,&nbsp;Ming Liao,&nbsp;Jiadong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fire.12300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent studies show that most financial market anomalies exhibit a momentum effect. Based on two datasets, (i) an original 22-factor sample and (ii) a more comprehensive 187-factor sample, we find that factor momentum effect is weak at the individual factor level. In both samples, only about 22%– 27% of the factors exhibit strong return continuation and dominate the factor momentum portfolio while the remaining factors do not. The factor momentum strategies do not outperform the corresponding long-only strategies in either sample. The choice of factors affects the ability of factor momentum to explain individual stock momentum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"585-615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fire.12300\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

最近的研究表明,大多数金融市场异常都表现出动量效应。基于(i)原始22因子样本和(ii)更全面的187因子样本两个数据集,我们发现因子动量效应在个体因子水平上较弱。在这两个样本中,只有约22% - 27%的因素表现出强劲的回报延续并主导因素动量组合,而其余因素则没有。在两个样本中,因子动量策略的表现都不优于相应的只做多策略。因子的选择影响因子动量解释个股动量的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A reexamination of factor momentum: How strong is it?

Recent studies show that most financial market anomalies exhibit a momentum effect. Based on two datasets, (i) an original 22-factor sample and (ii) a more comprehensive 187-factor sample, we find that factor momentum effect is weak at the individual factor level. In both samples, only about 22%– 27% of the factors exhibit strong return continuation and dominate the factor momentum portfolio while the remaining factors do not. The factor momentum strategies do not outperform the corresponding long-only strategies in either sample. The choice of factors affects the ability of factor momentum to explain individual stock momentum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
28.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Issue Information From anecdotes to insights: Streamlining the research idea generation process Mandatory audit partner rotation and earnings informativeness in the bond market Carbon risk and equity prices The value of talents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1