F62使用track-hd数据集识别和验证亨廷顿病定量运动测试(Q-motor)中的新变量

Philip Pracht, R. Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Benjamin Habbel, Karin Mittmann, R. Reilmann
{"title":"F62使用track-hd数据集识别和验证亨廷顿病定量运动测试(Q-motor)中的新变量","authors":"Philip Pracht, R. Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Benjamin Habbel, Karin Mittmann, R. Reilmann","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Clinical rating scales in clinical trials for Huntington’s disease (HD) have shown limited sensitivity in the premanifest stage of HD and often suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability and bias. Thus, there is an unmet need for objective and reliable assessments to serve as outcome measures in clinical trials. The Q-Motor, a sensor-based assessment battery, was developed to provide accurate and precise quantification of motor performance. During the analysis of the TRACK-HD study, a couple of variables turned out to be particularly sensitive, but further approaches on testing alternative variables have not been conducted, yet. Objective To identify novel conceptual variables for the Q-Motor digitomotography (speeded tapping) assessment, that have the potential to be more sensitive and robust particularly in the premanifest stage. The applicability of these variables should be investigated for cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, using the TRACK-HD data. Methods Q-Motor raw-data from the TRACK-HD study was used to extract the novel variables. The data sample included 4 year follow up data from 288 participants (age: 48 ± 10 years, female: 124, number of unaffected controls: 94). Statistical analyses were conducted using R. Generalized linear mixed models and ANOVA was used for group comparisons cross-sectional and longitudinally. Correlation with clinical rating scales and imaging parameters was performed. Results Most novel identified variables allow discrimination between controls pre-HD and manifest HD groups. Some even show significance in the more subtle distinction between pre-HD subgroups. Most variables also show good correlations with the clinical Total Motor Score (TMS) and with several magnet resonance (MR) imaging variables. Conclusion The sensitivity observed in the novel variables is comparable to that of previously used variables. However, the additional information may be useful for the creation of a combined measure, which will be explored in a next step.","PeriodicalId":16509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","volume":"220 1","pages":"A61 - A62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"F62 Identification and verification of novel variables in quantitative motor tests (Q-motor) in huntington’s disease, using the track-hd data set\",\"authors\":\"Philip Pracht, R. Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Benjamin Habbel, Karin Mittmann, R. Reilmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Clinical rating scales in clinical trials for Huntington’s disease (HD) have shown limited sensitivity in the premanifest stage of HD and often suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability and bias. Thus, there is an unmet need for objective and reliable assessments to serve as outcome measures in clinical trials. The Q-Motor, a sensor-based assessment battery, was developed to provide accurate and precise quantification of motor performance. During the analysis of the TRACK-HD study, a couple of variables turned out to be particularly sensitive, but further approaches on testing alternative variables have not been conducted, yet. Objective To identify novel conceptual variables for the Q-Motor digitomotography (speeded tapping) assessment, that have the potential to be more sensitive and robust particularly in the premanifest stage. The applicability of these variables should be investigated for cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, using the TRACK-HD data. Methods Q-Motor raw-data from the TRACK-HD study was used to extract the novel variables. The data sample included 4 year follow up data from 288 participants (age: 48 ± 10 years, female: 124, number of unaffected controls: 94). Statistical analyses were conducted using R. Generalized linear mixed models and ANOVA was used for group comparisons cross-sectional and longitudinally. Correlation with clinical rating scales and imaging parameters was performed. Results Most novel identified variables allow discrimination between controls pre-HD and manifest HD groups. Some even show significance in the more subtle distinction between pre-HD subgroups. Most variables also show good correlations with the clinical Total Motor Score (TMS) and with several magnet resonance (MR) imaging variables. Conclusion The sensitivity observed in the novel variables is comparable to that of previously used variables. However, the additional information may be useful for the creation of a combined measure, which will be explored in a next step.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"220 1\",\"pages\":\"A61 - A62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在亨廷顿舞蹈病(HD)的临床试验中,临床评分量表在HD的前期表现阶段显示出有限的敏感性,并且经常存在评分间和评分内的变异性和偏倚。因此,对客观可靠的评估作为临床试验结果测量的需求尚未得到满足。Q-Motor是一种基于传感器的评估电池,用于提供准确和精确的电机性能量化。在对TRACK-HD研究的分析过程中,有几个变量被证明是特别敏感的,但对测试替代变量的进一步方法尚未进行。目的为Q-Motor数字摄影(快速叩击)评估确定新的概念变量,这些变量具有更敏感和鲁棒性的潜力,特别是在预显阶段。应利用TRACK-HD数据调查这些变量的适用性,以便进行横断面和纵向分析。方法采用TRACK-HD研究的Q-Motor原始数据提取新变量。数据样本包括288名参与者(年龄:48±10岁,女性:124名,未受影响的对照组:94名)4年的随访数据。统计分析采用广义线性混合模型,组间比较采用横断面和纵向方差分析。与临床评定量表和影像学参数进行相关性分析。结果大多数新识别的变量允许在对照的HD前期和显性HD组之间进行区分。有些甚至显示出hd前亚群之间更细微的区别。大多数变量也显示出与临床总运动评分(TMS)和几个磁共振(MR)成像变量的良好相关性。结论新变量的敏感性与以前使用的变量相当。然而,额外的信息可能对创建组合度量有用,这将在下一个步骤中进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
F62 Identification and verification of novel variables in quantitative motor tests (Q-motor) in huntington’s disease, using the track-hd data set
Background Clinical rating scales in clinical trials for Huntington’s disease (HD) have shown limited sensitivity in the premanifest stage of HD and often suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability and bias. Thus, there is an unmet need for objective and reliable assessments to serve as outcome measures in clinical trials. The Q-Motor, a sensor-based assessment battery, was developed to provide accurate and precise quantification of motor performance. During the analysis of the TRACK-HD study, a couple of variables turned out to be particularly sensitive, but further approaches on testing alternative variables have not been conducted, yet. Objective To identify novel conceptual variables for the Q-Motor digitomotography (speeded tapping) assessment, that have the potential to be more sensitive and robust particularly in the premanifest stage. The applicability of these variables should be investigated for cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, using the TRACK-HD data. Methods Q-Motor raw-data from the TRACK-HD study was used to extract the novel variables. The data sample included 4 year follow up data from 288 participants (age: 48 ± 10 years, female: 124, number of unaffected controls: 94). Statistical analyses were conducted using R. Generalized linear mixed models and ANOVA was used for group comparisons cross-sectional and longitudinally. Correlation with clinical rating scales and imaging parameters was performed. Results Most novel identified variables allow discrimination between controls pre-HD and manifest HD groups. Some even show significance in the more subtle distinction between pre-HD subgroups. Most variables also show good correlations with the clinical Total Motor Score (TMS) and with several magnet resonance (MR) imaging variables. Conclusion The sensitivity observed in the novel variables is comparable to that of previously used variables. However, the additional information may be useful for the creation of a combined measure, which will be explored in a next step.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WED 253 An atypical presentation of sneddon syndrome H29 Practical tools and transfer aids in daily care for clients with advanced hd F06 When and how does manifest hd begin? a comparison of age at onset of motor and non-motor symptoms F33 Task-switching abilities in pre-manifest huntington’s disease subjects F56 Psychiatric symptoms in huntington’s disease: relationship to disease stage in the CAPIT-HD2 beta-testing study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1