两点bvp全局求解方法综述

J. R. Cash
{"title":"两点bvp全局求解方法综述","authors":"J. R. Cash","doi":"10.1002/anac.200310002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The task of comparing numerical methods which are designed to solve a particular class of problems is a notoriously difficult and inexact one. However it is important to be able to measure the quality of codes in at least a limited sense so that potential users of the software can have some guidance as to which code they might use to solve their particular problem. There are two important aspects that must be considered when numerical comparisons are contemplated. The first is to classify those codes which can be regarded as being reasonably efficient and so can set a standard against which other codes can be compared. The second is to identify some test problems which will challenge the codes and highlight any weaknesses they may have. In the present paper we consider the first of these two problems and we describe some codes which may be regarded as being amongst the most efficient for solving two-point boundary value problems at the present time. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim)</p>","PeriodicalId":100108,"journal":{"name":"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics","volume":"1 1","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/anac.200310002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of Some Global Methods for Solving Two-Point BVPs\",\"authors\":\"J. R. Cash\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anac.200310002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The task of comparing numerical methods which are designed to solve a particular class of problems is a notoriously difficult and inexact one. However it is important to be able to measure the quality of codes in at least a limited sense so that potential users of the software can have some guidance as to which code they might use to solve their particular problem. There are two important aspects that must be considered when numerical comparisons are contemplated. The first is to classify those codes which can be regarded as being reasonably efficient and so can set a standard against which other codes can be compared. The second is to identify some test problems which will challenge the codes and highlight any weaknesses they may have. In the present paper we consider the first of these two problems and we describe some codes which may be regarded as being amongst the most efficient for solving two-point boundary value problems at the present time. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"7-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/anac.200310002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anac.200310002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anac.200310002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

比较为解决一类特殊问题而设计的数值方法是出了名的困难和不精确的工作。然而,至少在有限的意义上能够衡量代码的质量是很重要的,这样软件的潜在用户就可以得到一些指导,知道他们可以使用哪些代码来解决他们的特定问题。在考虑数值比较时,必须考虑两个重要方面。首先是对那些可以被认为是相当有效的代码进行分类,从而可以设定一个标准,与其他代码进行比较。其次是识别一些测试问题,这些问题将挑战代码并突出它们可能具有的任何弱点。在本文中,我们考虑了这两个问题中的第一个问题,并描述了一些可以被认为是目前解决两点边值问题最有效的代码。(©2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &KGaA公司,Weinheim)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Survey of Some Global Methods for Solving Two-Point BVPs

The task of comparing numerical methods which are designed to solve a particular class of problems is a notoriously difficult and inexact one. However it is important to be able to measure the quality of codes in at least a limited sense so that potential users of the software can have some guidance as to which code they might use to solve their particular problem. There are two important aspects that must be considered when numerical comparisons are contemplated. The first is to classify those codes which can be regarded as being reasonably efficient and so can set a standard against which other codes can be compared. The second is to identify some test problems which will challenge the codes and highlight any weaknesses they may have. In the present paper we consider the first of these two problems and we describe some codes which may be regarded as being amongst the most efficient for solving two-point boundary value problems at the present time. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimation of the Greatest Common Divisor of many polynomials using hybrid computations performed by the ERES method Analysis and Application of an Orthogonal Nodal Basis on Triangles for Discontinuous Spectral Element Methods Analytic Evaluation of Collocation Integrals for the Radiosity Equation A Symplectic Trigonometrically Fitted Modified Partitioned Runge-Kutta Method for the Numerical Integration of Orbital Problems Solving Hyperbolic PDEs in MATLAB
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1