跨国能力和文化资本:塞尔维亚两组受过高等教育的回返者的经历

Q3 Social Sciences Stanovnistvo Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/stnv2201117p
Jelena Predojevic-Despic
{"title":"跨国能力和文化资本:塞尔维亚两组受过高等教育的回返者的经历","authors":"Jelena Predojevic-Despic","doi":"10.2298/stnv2201117p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the transnational competencies and cultural capital of migrants, as well as the mechanism of their transfer after returning to their countries of origin, based on Bourdieu?s conception of cultural capital. Using the example of two groups of highly educated returnees to Serbia - scientists and artists - the paper analyses the possibilities of the reproduction of cultural capital in a new, transnational context, between countries of origin and destination, as well as processes of transformation and the creation of new forms of cultural capital. Returning to Serbia was a transnational experience for a large number of respondents. This process was gradual, despite their expressed desire to return to live and work in Serbia. In some cases, it lasted for years, or the respondents were professionally present in both communities at the same time. Establishing themselves in several different societies enabled the respondents to open new transnational fields in which cultural capital was transformed and upgraded. This significantly helped them to better understand the differences in the functioning of the society of origin and destination, as well as to develop innovative opportunities to apply better communication and/or transfer knowledge and skills between the two settings. New forms of cultural capital have helped a large number of respondents come to the realisation that getting to know new cultures and improving communication with them brings new qualities and opportunities for global positioning in a professional sense. They also influence the formation of new life aspirations and missions that can spread new cultural practices that are relevant to the wider community. The results of the research show that the two observed groups of highly skilled returnees differ some-what in the way they have access to institutional support in the process of transferring cultural capital. Artists, especially if they work as freelancers upon their return to Serbia, have a significantly lower opportunity to use institutional support than researchers in science and teaching staff in tertiary education institutions. In that sense, they rely more on social capital, i.e. informal migrant networks, and in that way they look for ways to transform their cultural capital into economic capital. On the other hand, scientific institutes and universities have a relatively high degree of academic engagement and cooperation at both the national and international levels. Therefore, they possess elements of the transnational social field, that is, they represent multiple intertwined networks of professional and social relations through which scientists have the opportunity to exchange, organise, and transform ideas, practices, and resources. Although these processes take place in an uneven way, especially in the transnational context, they provide an opportunity to develop cosmopolitan, transnational cultural capital through the interaction of different types of competencies, which can be transformed into other forms of capital. Finally, it should be noted that the conclusions of this empirical research are based on a non-representative sample and cannot be generalised.","PeriodicalId":35694,"journal":{"name":"Stanovnistvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transnational competences and cultural capital: The experiences of two groups of highly educated returnees to Serbia\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Predojevic-Despic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/stnv2201117p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the transnational competencies and cultural capital of migrants, as well as the mechanism of their transfer after returning to their countries of origin, based on Bourdieu?s conception of cultural capital. Using the example of two groups of highly educated returnees to Serbia - scientists and artists - the paper analyses the possibilities of the reproduction of cultural capital in a new, transnational context, between countries of origin and destination, as well as processes of transformation and the creation of new forms of cultural capital. Returning to Serbia was a transnational experience for a large number of respondents. This process was gradual, despite their expressed desire to return to live and work in Serbia. In some cases, it lasted for years, or the respondents were professionally present in both communities at the same time. Establishing themselves in several different societies enabled the respondents to open new transnational fields in which cultural capital was transformed and upgraded. This significantly helped them to better understand the differences in the functioning of the society of origin and destination, as well as to develop innovative opportunities to apply better communication and/or transfer knowledge and skills between the two settings. New forms of cultural capital have helped a large number of respondents come to the realisation that getting to know new cultures and improving communication with them brings new qualities and opportunities for global positioning in a professional sense. They also influence the formation of new life aspirations and missions that can spread new cultural practices that are relevant to the wider community. The results of the research show that the two observed groups of highly skilled returnees differ some-what in the way they have access to institutional support in the process of transferring cultural capital. Artists, especially if they work as freelancers upon their return to Serbia, have a significantly lower opportunity to use institutional support than researchers in science and teaching staff in tertiary education institutions. In that sense, they rely more on social capital, i.e. informal migrant networks, and in that way they look for ways to transform their cultural capital into economic capital. On the other hand, scientific institutes and universities have a relatively high degree of academic engagement and cooperation at both the national and international levels. Therefore, they possess elements of the transnational social field, that is, they represent multiple intertwined networks of professional and social relations through which scientists have the opportunity to exchange, organise, and transform ideas, practices, and resources. Although these processes take place in an uneven way, especially in the transnational context, they provide an opportunity to develop cosmopolitan, transnational cultural capital through the interaction of different types of competencies, which can be transformed into other forms of capital. Finally, it should be noted that the conclusions of this empirical research are based on a non-representative sample and cannot be generalised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanovnistvo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanovnistvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/stnv2201117p\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanovnistvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/stnv2201117p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是为了更好地理解移民的跨国能力和文化资本,以及他们返回原籍国后的转移机制。文化资本的概念。本文以返回塞尔维亚的两组受过高等教育的回返者- -科学家和艺术家- -为例,分析了在原籍国和目的地国之间新的跨国背景下文化资本再生产的可能性,以及转变和创造新形式文化资本的过程。对许多答复者来说,返回塞尔维亚是一次跨国经历。这个过程是渐进的,尽管他们表示希望返回塞尔维亚生活和工作。在某些情况下,调查持续了数年,或者受访者的职业生涯同时出现在两个社区。在几个不同的社会中立足,使受访者能够开辟文化资本转型和升级的新的跨国领域。这极大地帮助他们更好地了解原籍社会和目的地社会在运作方面的差异,并开发创新的机会,以便在两个环境之间应用更好的沟通和/或转移知识和技能。新形式的文化资本帮助大量受访者意识到,了解新文化并改善与新文化的交流,为职业意义上的全球定位带来了新的品质和机会。它们还影响新的生活愿望和使命的形成,从而传播与更广泛的社区有关的新的文化习俗。研究结果表明,观察到的两组高技能回国人员在文化资本转移过程中获得体制支持的方式有所不同。艺术家,特别是那些在返回塞尔维亚后以自由职业者身份工作的艺术家,与科学研究人员和高等教育机构的教学人员相比,获得机构支持的机会要低得多。从这个意义上说,他们更多地依赖社会资本,即非正式的移民网络,并以这种方式寻找将其文化资本转化为经济资本的方法。另一方面,科研院所和大学在国内和国际层面的学术参与和合作程度相对较高。因此,它们具有跨国社会领域的要素,也就是说,它们代表了专业和社会关系的多个相互交织的网络,通过这些网络,科学家有机会交流、组织和转化思想、实践和资源。尽管这些过程以不平衡的方式发生,特别是在跨国背景下,但它们提供了一个机会,通过不同类型的能力的相互作用,发展世界性的跨国文化资本,这些能力可以转化为其他形式的资本。最后,应该指出的是,这一实证研究的结论是基于一个非代表性的样本,不能一概而论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transnational competences and cultural capital: The experiences of two groups of highly educated returnees to Serbia
The aim of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the transnational competencies and cultural capital of migrants, as well as the mechanism of their transfer after returning to their countries of origin, based on Bourdieu?s conception of cultural capital. Using the example of two groups of highly educated returnees to Serbia - scientists and artists - the paper analyses the possibilities of the reproduction of cultural capital in a new, transnational context, between countries of origin and destination, as well as processes of transformation and the creation of new forms of cultural capital. Returning to Serbia was a transnational experience for a large number of respondents. This process was gradual, despite their expressed desire to return to live and work in Serbia. In some cases, it lasted for years, or the respondents were professionally present in both communities at the same time. Establishing themselves in several different societies enabled the respondents to open new transnational fields in which cultural capital was transformed and upgraded. This significantly helped them to better understand the differences in the functioning of the society of origin and destination, as well as to develop innovative opportunities to apply better communication and/or transfer knowledge and skills between the two settings. New forms of cultural capital have helped a large number of respondents come to the realisation that getting to know new cultures and improving communication with them brings new qualities and opportunities for global positioning in a professional sense. They also influence the formation of new life aspirations and missions that can spread new cultural practices that are relevant to the wider community. The results of the research show that the two observed groups of highly skilled returnees differ some-what in the way they have access to institutional support in the process of transferring cultural capital. Artists, especially if they work as freelancers upon their return to Serbia, have a significantly lower opportunity to use institutional support than researchers in science and teaching staff in tertiary education institutions. In that sense, they rely more on social capital, i.e. informal migrant networks, and in that way they look for ways to transform their cultural capital into economic capital. On the other hand, scientific institutes and universities have a relatively high degree of academic engagement and cooperation at both the national and international levels. Therefore, they possess elements of the transnational social field, that is, they represent multiple intertwined networks of professional and social relations through which scientists have the opportunity to exchange, organise, and transform ideas, practices, and resources. Although these processes take place in an uneven way, especially in the transnational context, they provide an opportunity to develop cosmopolitan, transnational cultural capital through the interaction of different types of competencies, which can be transformed into other forms of capital. Finally, it should be noted that the conclusions of this empirical research are based on a non-representative sample and cannot be generalised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stanovnistvo
Stanovnistvo Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is there communication? Access to information by persons with disabilities in Serbia Regulation of temporary agency work and the modern labor market: a case study of Slovenia Integrating advanced technologies for enhanced demographic research and urban planning Characteristics of the labor market in Croatia and contemporary external migration Uticaj migratornih kretanja na tržište rada u zemljama Zapadnog Balkana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1