自付医疗费用的决定因素:系统回顾

A. Fakhri, M. H. Juni
{"title":"自付医疗费用的决定因素:系统回顾","authors":"A. Fakhri, M. H. Juni","doi":"10.32827/ijphcs.6.2.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure is a cost for health care that are paid by individuals at the time of treatment through user fees, co-payments and direct payments. It is the most common way of paying for health services in developing nations particularly in low and middle-income countries. OOP payments are typically perceived to be the most regressive instrument of health finance and high reliance to it create a significant financial barrier in accessing health care. Objectives: To assess the determinants of OOP expenditures for health care. Materials and Methods: Journal and articles related on determinants of OOP health expenditures were compiled using a major online database, PubMed and Science Direct. The search was limited to full-text papers published in English and studies conducted within the last 10 years (2007-2017). The selection of articles to be reviewed is done according to the PRISMA checklist. Result: The main determinants of OOP health expenditure identified were age, gender, place of living, education and income level, household size and presence of comorbidities. Other determinants were marital status, insurance status, payments for medical supplies and pharmaceuticals and distance to health facilities Conclusion: OOP payments is not an equitable nor efficient financing mechanism. A government need to formulate the best health financing mechanism to achieve a complete universal health coverage status. This review can help policy-makers in identifying the determinants of OOP, focussing on the mechanisms driving them, and formulate policy options for building stronger health financing mechanisms. Keywords: Determinants, Out-of-Pocket, Expenditure, Health Care","PeriodicalId":14315,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DETERMINANTS OF OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENDITURE FOR HEALTH CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"A. Fakhri, M. H. Juni\",\"doi\":\"10.32827/ijphcs.6.2.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure is a cost for health care that are paid by individuals at the time of treatment through user fees, co-payments and direct payments. It is the most common way of paying for health services in developing nations particularly in low and middle-income countries. OOP payments are typically perceived to be the most regressive instrument of health finance and high reliance to it create a significant financial barrier in accessing health care. Objectives: To assess the determinants of OOP expenditures for health care. Materials and Methods: Journal and articles related on determinants of OOP health expenditures were compiled using a major online database, PubMed and Science Direct. The search was limited to full-text papers published in English and studies conducted within the last 10 years (2007-2017). The selection of articles to be reviewed is done according to the PRISMA checklist. Result: The main determinants of OOP health expenditure identified were age, gender, place of living, education and income level, household size and presence of comorbidities. Other determinants were marital status, insurance status, payments for medical supplies and pharmaceuticals and distance to health facilities Conclusion: OOP payments is not an equitable nor efficient financing mechanism. A government need to formulate the best health financing mechanism to achieve a complete universal health coverage status. This review can help policy-makers in identifying the determinants of OOP, focussing on the mechanisms driving them, and formulate policy options for building stronger health financing mechanisms. Keywords: Determinants, Out-of-Pocket, Expenditure, Health Care\",\"PeriodicalId\":14315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.2.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.2.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:自付(OOP)支出是个人在治疗时通过用户费用、共同支付和直接支付支付的卫生保健费用。在发展中国家,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,这是支付卫生服务费用的最常见方式。面向对象付款通常被认为是卫生财政中倒退最严重的工具,对它的高度依赖造成了获得卫生保健的重大财政障碍。目的:评价面向对象的卫生保健支出的决定因素。材料和方法:使用一个主要的在线数据库PubMed和Science Direct汇编了与面向对象的卫生支出决定因素相关的期刊和文章。检索仅限于过去10年(2007-2017年)发表的英文全文论文和研究。要审查的文章的选择是根据PRISMA核对表完成的。结果:年龄、性别、居住地、教育程度和收入水平、家庭规模和是否存在合并症是影响OOP卫生支出的主要因素。其他决定因素包括婚姻状况、保险状况、医疗用品和药品的支付以及与保健设施的距离。结论:OOP支付不是一种公平和有效的融资机制。政府需要制定最佳的卫生筹资机制,以实现完全的全民健康覆盖。这项审查可以帮助决策者确定面向对象的决定因素,重点关注推动这些决定因素的机制,并为建立更强有力的卫生筹资机制制定政策选择。关键词:决定因素,自费,支出,卫生保健
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DETERMINANTS OF OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENDITURE FOR HEALTH CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Background: Out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure is a cost for health care that are paid by individuals at the time of treatment through user fees, co-payments and direct payments. It is the most common way of paying for health services in developing nations particularly in low and middle-income countries. OOP payments are typically perceived to be the most regressive instrument of health finance and high reliance to it create a significant financial barrier in accessing health care. Objectives: To assess the determinants of OOP expenditures for health care. Materials and Methods: Journal and articles related on determinants of OOP health expenditures were compiled using a major online database, PubMed and Science Direct. The search was limited to full-text papers published in English and studies conducted within the last 10 years (2007-2017). The selection of articles to be reviewed is done according to the PRISMA checklist. Result: The main determinants of OOP health expenditure identified were age, gender, place of living, education and income level, household size and presence of comorbidities. Other determinants were marital status, insurance status, payments for medical supplies and pharmaceuticals and distance to health facilities Conclusion: OOP payments is not an equitable nor efficient financing mechanism. A government need to formulate the best health financing mechanism to achieve a complete universal health coverage status. This review can help policy-makers in identifying the determinants of OOP, focussing on the mechanisms driving them, and formulate policy options for building stronger health financing mechanisms. Keywords: Determinants, Out-of-Pocket, Expenditure, Health Care
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated with the Incidence of COVID-19: A Case Control Study in Tasikmalaya, Indonesia Proficiency, Psychological Wellbeing, and Coping of the College Freshmen of the University of Nueva Caceres Potential of Harum Manis Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) Seed Extract for Nosocomial Infections Stress and Burnout among Medical Workers in Indonesia: A Study during COVID-19 Pandemic Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Issues: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1