费希特晚期哲学中的知识形象

Olha Netrebiak
{"title":"费希特晚期哲学中的知识形象","authors":"Olha Netrebiak","doi":"10.18523/2617-1678.2022.9-10.89-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author analyses Fichte’s understanding of knowledge as image that related to his late period of creativity, precisely Doctrine of Science 1813. The appeal to the late period of Fichte’s work is necessary because these texts are little researched. They are also pre-mortal, so they can safely be called a mature work of Fichte’s philosophical project. The study of the late period allows us to destroy most of the stereotypes and deformations that overgrown Fichte’s philosophy until the second half of the twentieth century through dominant Hegelian interpretation. Explaining nature of knowledge, how it is in itself, Fichte tries to dissociate from philosophy of Spinoza at the same time, developing doctrine of the image as a manifestation of the Absolute. The image for him is not a copy of being, but possesses some autonomy, and at the same time, possesses the formative and creative capacity. The Absolute (God), who manifest himself through the image, but is not reduced to him and Fichte has difficulties with explanation how the Absolute is present in his manifestation. The article also investigates the idea of “I” as image of God. Philosopher understands limitation of the explanation of consciousness from the point of the same subject, therefore he appeals to rich metaphorical language, which has an aims to look on consciousness and reflection in different way. In this attempt to explain the nature of knowledge, the last word is not always told by the subject himself. Theological perspective over which the philosopher builds his doctrine of image broadens the understanding of knowledge like image of God.","PeriodicalId":34696,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge as Image in the Late Philosophy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte\",\"authors\":\"Olha Netrebiak\",\"doi\":\"10.18523/2617-1678.2022.9-10.89-97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author analyses Fichte’s understanding of knowledge as image that related to his late period of creativity, precisely Doctrine of Science 1813. The appeal to the late period of Fichte’s work is necessary because these texts are little researched. They are also pre-mortal, so they can safely be called a mature work of Fichte’s philosophical project. The study of the late period allows us to destroy most of the stereotypes and deformations that overgrown Fichte’s philosophy until the second half of the twentieth century through dominant Hegelian interpretation. Explaining nature of knowledge, how it is in itself, Fichte tries to dissociate from philosophy of Spinoza at the same time, developing doctrine of the image as a manifestation of the Absolute. The image for him is not a copy of being, but possesses some autonomy, and at the same time, possesses the formative and creative capacity. The Absolute (God), who manifest himself through the image, but is not reduced to him and Fichte has difficulties with explanation how the Absolute is present in his manifestation. The article also investigates the idea of “I” as image of God. Philosopher understands limitation of the explanation of consciousness from the point of the same subject, therefore he appeals to rich metaphorical language, which has an aims to look on consciousness and reflection in different way. In this attempt to explain the nature of knowledge, the last word is not always told by the subject himself. Theological perspective over which the philosopher builds his doctrine of image broadens the understanding of knowledge like image of God.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2022.9-10.89-97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2022.9-10.89-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者分析了费希特对知识作为形象的理解,这与他创作后期,即1813年的《科学主义》有关。对费希特晚期作品的呼吁是必要的,因为这些文本很少被研究。它们也是先于人类的,所以它们可以被安全地称为费希特哲学项目的成熟作品。对后期的研究使我们能够通过黑格尔式的主流解释,摧毁大部分充斥着费希特哲学直到20世纪下半叶的刻板印象和扭曲。费希特在解释知识的本质及其本身时,试图与斯宾诺莎的哲学分离,同时发展了作为绝对表现形式的形象学说。对他来说,形象不是存在的复制品,而是具有一定的自主性,同时又具有形成和创造的能力。绝对(上帝),他通过形象显现自己,但不被简化为他,费希特在解释绝对如何在他的表现中出现时遇到了困难。文章还探讨了“我”作为上帝形象的观念。哲学家从同一主体的角度理解意识解释的局限性,因此他借助于丰富的隐喻语言,以不同的方式看待意识和反思。在试图解释知识本质的过程中,最后的定论并不总是由研究对象自己说了算。哲学家建立形象学说的神学视角拓宽了对上帝形象等知识的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge as Image in the Late Philosophy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Author analyses Fichte’s understanding of knowledge as image that related to his late period of creativity, precisely Doctrine of Science 1813. The appeal to the late period of Fichte’s work is necessary because these texts are little researched. They are also pre-mortal, so they can safely be called a mature work of Fichte’s philosophical project. The study of the late period allows us to destroy most of the stereotypes and deformations that overgrown Fichte’s philosophy until the second half of the twentieth century through dominant Hegelian interpretation. Explaining nature of knowledge, how it is in itself, Fichte tries to dissociate from philosophy of Spinoza at the same time, developing doctrine of the image as a manifestation of the Absolute. The image for him is not a copy of being, but possesses some autonomy, and at the same time, possesses the formative and creative capacity. The Absolute (God), who manifest himself through the image, but is not reduced to him and Fichte has difficulties with explanation how the Absolute is present in his manifestation. The article also investigates the idea of “I” as image of God. Philosopher understands limitation of the explanation of consciousness from the point of the same subject, therefore he appeals to rich metaphorical language, which has an aims to look on consciousness and reflection in different way. In this attempt to explain the nature of knowledge, the last word is not always told by the subject himself. Theological perspective over which the philosopher builds his doctrine of image broadens the understanding of knowledge like image of God.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Contribution of Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Towards the Development of Philosophy and Religious Studies in the National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” Hryhorii Skovoroda and Western European Philosophy: Between the Banks of Mysticism and Rationalism Ideas I: Transcendental Turn in Phenomenological Philosophy Philosophical Dimension of Today’s Educational Technologies: Framing Ethical Landscape of the Smart Education Domain Knowledge as Image in the Late Philosophy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1