领导教学与学习的学术:理解实践中的桥梁和差距

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2019-05-31 DOI:10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7995
Nicola. Simmons, K. Taylor
{"title":"领导教学与学习的学术:理解实践中的桥梁和差距","authors":"Nicola. Simmons, K. Taylor","doi":"10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gap between the practice of individual academics based on the ideal of the SoTL—improving student learning—and the institutional infrastructure and leadership to support that work is an ongoing challenge to the development of the field (Hutchings, Huber, & Ciccone, 2011; Poole, Taylor, & Thompson, 2007; Simmons, forthcoming). To better understand how individuals in diverse roles contribute to the development of the SoTL in the context of their institutional cultures, this study examined how faculty, educational developers (EDs), and administrators enact SoTL leadership. A grounded theory approach (Leedy & Ormrod, 2001) guided the development of a survey that used closed and open-ended questions to invite respondents to share their personal conceptions and lived experiences of the SoTL. Drawing on the responses received (n=75), we identified ways faculty, educational developers, and administrators construe their SoTL leadership roles and how they can fulfill a vital role in facilitating leadership across and beyond their institutions to create critical social networks for SoTL work (Mårtensson, Roxå, & Olsson, 2012; Williams et al., 2013) and contribute to institutional cultures that support and value that work. The results reveal how gaps between the work of individual scholars and the cultures of their academic communities are being bridged through diverse leadership roles that cross multiple levels in their institutions and identify some of the gaps that remain.","PeriodicalId":44267,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leadership for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Understanding Bridges and Gaps in Practice\",\"authors\":\"Nicola. Simmons, K. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The gap between the practice of individual academics based on the ideal of the SoTL—improving student learning—and the institutional infrastructure and leadership to support that work is an ongoing challenge to the development of the field (Hutchings, Huber, & Ciccone, 2011; Poole, Taylor, & Thompson, 2007; Simmons, forthcoming). To better understand how individuals in diverse roles contribute to the development of the SoTL in the context of their institutional cultures, this study examined how faculty, educational developers (EDs), and administrators enact SoTL leadership. A grounded theory approach (Leedy & Ormrod, 2001) guided the development of a survey that used closed and open-ended questions to invite respondents to share their personal conceptions and lived experiences of the SoTL. Drawing on the responses received (n=75), we identified ways faculty, educational developers, and administrators construe their SoTL leadership roles and how they can fulfill a vital role in facilitating leadership across and beyond their institutions to create critical social networks for SoTL work (Mårtensson, Roxå, & Olsson, 2012; Williams et al., 2013) and contribute to institutional cultures that support and value that work. The results reveal how gaps between the work of individual scholars and the cultures of their academic communities are being bridged through diverse leadership roles that cross multiple levels in their institutions and identify some of the gaps that remain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7995\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/CJSOTL-RCACEA.2019.1.7995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

基于sotl理想的个别学者的实践——改善学生的学习——与支持这项工作的机构基础设施和领导力之间的差距,是该领域发展面临的持续挑战(Hutchings, Huber, & Ciccone, 2011;普尔,泰勒,汤普森,2007;西蒙斯,即将出版)。为了更好地理解不同角色的个人如何在他们的制度文化背景下促进SoTL的发展,本研究考察了教师、教育开发人员(ed)和管理人员如何制定SoTL领导。基于理论的方法(Leedy & Ormrod, 2001)指导了一项调查的发展,该调查使用封闭和开放式的问题来邀请受访者分享他们对SoTL的个人概念和生活经验。根据收到的反馈(n=75),我们确定了教师、教育开发人员和管理人员如何解释他们的SoTL领导角色,以及他们如何在促进跨机构和跨机构的领导方面发挥重要作用,为SoTL工作创建关键的社会网络(mamatrtensson, rox, & Olsson, 2012;Williams et al., 2013),并为支持和重视这些工作的机构文化做出贡献。研究结果揭示了学者个人的工作与其学术团体的文化之间的差距是如何通过在其机构中跨越多个层次的不同领导角色来弥合的,并确定了一些仍然存在的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leadership for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Understanding Bridges and Gaps in Practice
The gap between the practice of individual academics based on the ideal of the SoTL—improving student learning—and the institutional infrastructure and leadership to support that work is an ongoing challenge to the development of the field (Hutchings, Huber, & Ciccone, 2011; Poole, Taylor, & Thompson, 2007; Simmons, forthcoming). To better understand how individuals in diverse roles contribute to the development of the SoTL in the context of their institutional cultures, this study examined how faculty, educational developers (EDs), and administrators enact SoTL leadership. A grounded theory approach (Leedy & Ormrod, 2001) guided the development of a survey that used closed and open-ended questions to invite respondents to share their personal conceptions and lived experiences of the SoTL. Drawing on the responses received (n=75), we identified ways faculty, educational developers, and administrators construe their SoTL leadership roles and how they can fulfill a vital role in facilitating leadership across and beyond their institutions to create critical social networks for SoTL work (Mårtensson, Roxå, & Olsson, 2012; Williams et al., 2013) and contribute to institutional cultures that support and value that work. The results reveal how gaps between the work of individual scholars and the cultures of their academic communities are being bridged through diverse leadership roles that cross multiple levels in their institutions and identify some of the gaps that remain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Value of Integrating Writing and Writing Instruction into a Research Methods Course Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Barriers to Study Abroad Renewing our Commitment to Teaching Excellence through SoTL: An Introduction to Issue 14.1 Developing an Undergraduate Career Conference: Leveraging Mentorship to Promote Career Discovery Facilitated Study Groups for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry: Experience from a Large Public Canadian University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1