公共文化与公众:一篇综述文章

Kevin V. Mulcahy
{"title":"公共文化与公众:一篇综述文章","authors":"Kevin V. Mulcahy","doi":"10.1177/106591298103400312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T HERE HAS BEEN a veritable explosion of literature on public policy and the arts in the past five years. While the effect of the blasts has not exactly ignited a firestorm of interest among political scientists, students of public policy-making and public policy-makers have become increasingly aware of public culture as a political and administrative issue. What is perhaps politically most significant about public culture is the speed with which the arts have become ensconced in the policy-making process. Less than twenty years ago a discussion of public support for culture would have been conjectural or historical; public arts agencies today are institutionalized dispensers of governmental patronage. What was once done by churches and courts is now done by administrative agencies in both the United States and Europe. If we do not have a federal \"Department of Cultural Affairs,\" our network of arts agencies constitutes a cultural establishment. The best-known of the arts agencies is the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), which along with its less-glamorous sister agency, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), was established in 1965. In the late 1960s, Congress established the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB) as a conduit for federal funding to support public radio and television. (CPB, however, is prohibited from directly producing programming; that is a job for the Public Broadcasting Service and its member stations.) NEA, NEH, and CPB were each funded at about $150 million in 1980 and together make up the bulk of the cultural establishment. The federal government is also involved with the arts through lesser-known agencies such as the Museum Services Institute; various programs supported by the Department of Education, National Park Service and National Science Foundation; works commissioned for public buildings by the General Services Administration; the museum system supported by the Smithsonian Institution; the National Archives and Library of Congress; and the overseas cultural exchanges sponsored by the International Communication Agency. Some of the significance of public involvement on artistic production can be seen in two New Yorker cartoons. One of a few years ago shows a writer being visited by one of the Muses who whispers apologetically; \"I don't have any inspiration today but","PeriodicalId":83314,"journal":{"name":"The Western political quarterly","volume":"40 1","pages":"461 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Culture and the Public: a Review Article\",\"authors\":\"Kevin V. Mulcahy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/106591298103400312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T HERE HAS BEEN a veritable explosion of literature on public policy and the arts in the past five years. While the effect of the blasts has not exactly ignited a firestorm of interest among political scientists, students of public policy-making and public policy-makers have become increasingly aware of public culture as a political and administrative issue. What is perhaps politically most significant about public culture is the speed with which the arts have become ensconced in the policy-making process. Less than twenty years ago a discussion of public support for culture would have been conjectural or historical; public arts agencies today are institutionalized dispensers of governmental patronage. What was once done by churches and courts is now done by administrative agencies in both the United States and Europe. If we do not have a federal \\\"Department of Cultural Affairs,\\\" our network of arts agencies constitutes a cultural establishment. The best-known of the arts agencies is the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), which along with its less-glamorous sister agency, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), was established in 1965. In the late 1960s, Congress established the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB) as a conduit for federal funding to support public radio and television. (CPB, however, is prohibited from directly producing programming; that is a job for the Public Broadcasting Service and its member stations.) NEA, NEH, and CPB were each funded at about $150 million in 1980 and together make up the bulk of the cultural establishment. The federal government is also involved with the arts through lesser-known agencies such as the Museum Services Institute; various programs supported by the Department of Education, National Park Service and National Science Foundation; works commissioned for public buildings by the General Services Administration; the museum system supported by the Smithsonian Institution; the National Archives and Library of Congress; and the overseas cultural exchanges sponsored by the International Communication Agency. Some of the significance of public involvement on artistic production can be seen in two New Yorker cartoons. One of a few years ago shows a writer being visited by one of the Muses who whispers apologetically; \\\"I don't have any inspiration today but\",\"PeriodicalId\":83314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Western political quarterly\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"461 - 470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Western political quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298103400312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western political quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298103400312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的五年里,公共政策和艺术方面的文学作品出现了名副其实的爆炸式增长。虽然爆炸的影响并没有引起政治学家的兴趣,但研究公共政策制定的学生和公共政策制定者已经越来越意识到公共文化是一个政治和行政问题。公共文化在政治上最重要的可能是艺术迅速融入政策制定过程。不到20年前,关于公众对文化的支持的讨论可能只是猜测或历史;今天的公共艺术机构是政府赞助的制度化分配者。在美国和欧洲,曾经由教堂和法院完成的事情现在由行政机构完成。如果我们没有一个联邦“文化事务部”,我们的艺术机构网络就构成了一个文化机构。最著名的艺术机构是国家艺术基金会(NEA),它和它不那么光鲜的姐妹机构国家人文基金会(NEH)成立于1965年。20世纪60年代末,国会成立了公共广播公司(CPB),作为联邦资金支持公共广播和电视的渠道。(但是,禁止中央电视台直接制作节目;这是公共广播服务及其成员电台的工作。)1980年,NEA、NEH和CPB各获得了约1.5亿美元的资金,它们共同构成了美国文化机构的主体。联邦政府还通过博物馆服务协会等不太知名的机构参与艺术;教育部、国家公园管理局和国家科学基金会支持的各种项目;总务管理局委托进行的公共建筑工程;史密森学会支持的博物馆系统;国家档案馆和国会图书馆;以及国际传播署主办的海外文化交流活动。公众参与艺术创作的一些重要意义可以从《纽约客》的两幅漫画中看出。几年前的一幅画中,一位作家被一位缪斯女神拜访,她低声道歉;“我今天没有任何灵感,但是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public Culture and the Public: a Review Article
T HERE HAS BEEN a veritable explosion of literature on public policy and the arts in the past five years. While the effect of the blasts has not exactly ignited a firestorm of interest among political scientists, students of public policy-making and public policy-makers have become increasingly aware of public culture as a political and administrative issue. What is perhaps politically most significant about public culture is the speed with which the arts have become ensconced in the policy-making process. Less than twenty years ago a discussion of public support for culture would have been conjectural or historical; public arts agencies today are institutionalized dispensers of governmental patronage. What was once done by churches and courts is now done by administrative agencies in both the United States and Europe. If we do not have a federal "Department of Cultural Affairs," our network of arts agencies constitutes a cultural establishment. The best-known of the arts agencies is the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), which along with its less-glamorous sister agency, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), was established in 1965. In the late 1960s, Congress established the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB) as a conduit for federal funding to support public radio and television. (CPB, however, is prohibited from directly producing programming; that is a job for the Public Broadcasting Service and its member stations.) NEA, NEH, and CPB were each funded at about $150 million in 1980 and together make up the bulk of the cultural establishment. The federal government is also involved with the arts through lesser-known agencies such as the Museum Services Institute; various programs supported by the Department of Education, National Park Service and National Science Foundation; works commissioned for public buildings by the General Services Administration; the museum system supported by the Smithsonian Institution; the National Archives and Library of Congress; and the overseas cultural exchanges sponsored by the International Communication Agency. Some of the significance of public involvement on artistic production can be seen in two New Yorker cartoons. One of a few years ago shows a writer being visited by one of the Muses who whispers apologetically; "I don't have any inspiration today but
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability. Bicameralism and the Theory of Voting Party, Ideology, and the Lure of Victory: Iowa Activists in the 1980 Prenomination Campaign Campaign Spending in Contests for Governor The End of Methodology? a Review Essay On Evaluation Research Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1