主体是穆斯林伦理的中心吗?跨国什叶派社区什一伦理的重新定位

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09596410.2022.2074625
Samuel D. Blanch
{"title":"主体是穆斯林伦理的中心吗?跨国什叶派社区什一伦理的重新定位","authors":"Samuel D. Blanch","doi":"10.1080/09596410.2022.2074625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article offers a critique of the descriptive power of subjectivity in studies of contemporary Muslim ethics. After Saba Mahmood and others, subjectivity has become perhaps the dominant analytical tool for the description of the ethical qualities of modern religious life. It is responsive to both the reflexivity held to be newly characteristic of modernity, and to the need to allow for the sheer diversity of modern religious life. However, through a multisite ethnographic study of the Shi‘i Muslim khums, an obligatory 20% ‘tithe’ or tax on annual income, the article argues that approaches to ethics in terms of subjectivity have been insufficiently attentive to the ethical gravity of the thing itself. The special characteristics of khums payment, administration and disbursement between fieldsites in Australia and Iran, serve to foreground issues neglected in a literature that has focused almost entirely on a Sunni ‘orthopraxy’. Methodologically, the article argues for a greater attentiveness to the materiality of the things of ethics and, conceptually, for a shift towards relations between persons and things as the locus of ethical investigation.","PeriodicalId":45172,"journal":{"name":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Subject the Locus of Muslim Ethics? Relocating the Ethics of Tithing in the Transnational Shi‘i Community\",\"authors\":\"Samuel D. Blanch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09596410.2022.2074625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article offers a critique of the descriptive power of subjectivity in studies of contemporary Muslim ethics. After Saba Mahmood and others, subjectivity has become perhaps the dominant analytical tool for the description of the ethical qualities of modern religious life. It is responsive to both the reflexivity held to be newly characteristic of modernity, and to the need to allow for the sheer diversity of modern religious life. However, through a multisite ethnographic study of the Shi‘i Muslim khums, an obligatory 20% ‘tithe’ or tax on annual income, the article argues that approaches to ethics in terms of subjectivity have been insufficiently attentive to the ethical gravity of the thing itself. The special characteristics of khums payment, administration and disbursement between fieldsites in Australia and Iran, serve to foreground issues neglected in a literature that has focused almost entirely on a Sunni ‘orthopraxy’. Methodologically, the article argues for a greater attentiveness to the materiality of the things of ethics and, conceptually, for a shift towards relations between persons and things as the locus of ethical investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2074625\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2074625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对当代穆斯林伦理研究中主体性的描述力量进行了批判。在萨巴·马哈茂德和其他人之后,主观性可能已经成为描述现代宗教生活伦理品质的主要分析工具。它既回应了现代性新特征的反身性,也回应了允许现代宗教生活纯粹多样性的需要。然而,通过对什叶派穆斯林khums的多地点民族志研究,一种强制性的20%的“什一税”或年收入税,文章认为,在主观性方面的伦理学方法对事物本身的伦理严肃性关注不足。在澳大利亚和伊朗的实地站点之间,khums支付、管理和支付的特殊特征,有助于突出在几乎完全集中在逊尼派“正极”的文献中被忽视的问题。在方法上,本文主张对伦理事物的物质性给予更多的关注,在概念上,将人与事物之间的关系转变为伦理调查的中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the Subject the Locus of Muslim Ethics? Relocating the Ethics of Tithing in the Transnational Shi‘i Community
ABSTRACT This article offers a critique of the descriptive power of subjectivity in studies of contemporary Muslim ethics. After Saba Mahmood and others, subjectivity has become perhaps the dominant analytical tool for the description of the ethical qualities of modern religious life. It is responsive to both the reflexivity held to be newly characteristic of modernity, and to the need to allow for the sheer diversity of modern religious life. However, through a multisite ethnographic study of the Shi‘i Muslim khums, an obligatory 20% ‘tithe’ or tax on annual income, the article argues that approaches to ethics in terms of subjectivity have been insufficiently attentive to the ethical gravity of the thing itself. The special characteristics of khums payment, administration and disbursement between fieldsites in Australia and Iran, serve to foreground issues neglected in a literature that has focused almost entirely on a Sunni ‘orthopraxy’. Methodologically, the article argues for a greater attentiveness to the materiality of the things of ethics and, conceptually, for a shift towards relations between persons and things as the locus of ethical investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations (ICMR) provides a forum for the academic exploration and discussion of the religious tradition of Islam, and of relations between Islam and other religions. It is edited by members of the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. The editors welcome articles on all aspects of Islam, and particularly on: •the religion and culture of Islam, historical and contemporary •Islam and its relations with other faiths and ideologies •Christian-Muslim relations. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations is a refereed, academic journal. It publishes articles, documentation and reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Prophet Muḥammad between Lived Religion and Elite Discourse: Rethinking and Decolonizing Christian Assessments of the uswa ḥasana through Comparative Theological Aesthetics Islamic Headscarves: The Other-Religion Effect and Religious Literacy at the European Court of Human Rights The Fatimids 2: The Rule from Egypt and Shiʿite Rulers, Sunni Rivals, and Christians in Between: Muslim–Christian Relations in Fāṭimid Palestine and Egypt The Fatimids 2: The Rule from Egypt , by Shainool Jiwa[World of Islam], London, I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2023, vi + 238 pp., £9.99 (paperback), ISBN 9780755646753 Shiʿite Rulers, Sunni Rivals, and Christians in Between: Muslim–Christian Relations in Fāṭimid Palestine and Egypt , by Steven… The Concept of Soul in Judaism, Christianity and Islam The Concept of Soul in Judaism, Christianity and Islam , edited by Christoph Böttingheimer and Wenzel Maximilian Widenka [Key Concepts in Interreligious Discourses 11], Berlin, De Gruyter, 2023, vii+132 pp., €24.95 (paperback), ISBN 978 3 11 074818 5 The Genoese Predicament: Christian–Muslim Communication in the Annales Ianuenses ( c. 1099–1293)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1