乳腺保守手术后不同低分割辅助放疗技术对左侧乳腺癌患者心脏和左前降支剂量的剂量学评价

Nindra Armugam, Zohaib Saleem, Chandipriya Veluru, E. Ramanjaneyulu
{"title":"乳腺保守手术后不同低分割辅助放疗技术对左侧乳腺癌患者心脏和左前降支剂量的剂量学评价","authors":"Nindra Armugam, Zohaib Saleem, Chandipriya Veluru, E. Ramanjaneyulu","doi":"10.15587/2519-4798.2022.265543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims: to dosimetrically evaluate the dose to the heart and left anterior descending artery in left-sided early breast cases using different techniques. \nMaterials and methods: Prospective observational/analytical study done in cases of left-sided BCS referred for adjuvant RT in 54 patients. Patients who underwent left-sided BCS (breast conservative surgery), patients aged between 18- and 75 years performance status ECOG 0-2, histological confirmed DCIS, Invasive Breast Cancer-Stage 1, 2, 3, patients without any evidence of metastatic disease Irrespective of hormonal receptor and HER-2 neu status are included in the study. \nResults: All the 3 parameters for LAD showed the highest doses with 3DCRT and lowest with VMAT. Thus our study favoured VMAT (p<0.01) as the planning technique to achieve the least doses of LAD. However, for the heart, there was no statistically significant difference between 3DCRT and IMRT (p=0.349) for the average mean dose (Gy). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference between 3DCRT Vs VMAT and IMRT Vs VMAT (95 % CI, p<0.01), again favouring VMAT as the choice of planning technique. The average heart max dose(Gy) and average heart V20(%) showed statistically significant benefits with VMAT (p<0.01). There was a statistically significant benefit (p<0.000) with VMAT for both LV parameters. At the same time, there was a statistically significant benefit in terms of ipsilateral lung dose with VMAT(p<0.000), the dose to the right lung, right breast and favoured 3DCRT (p<0.01). PTV95 % (Gy) by 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT in our study is 41.01, 41.96, and 41.76, respectively. Though the difference between the 3 techniques seems meagre, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.012) favouring IMRT. \nConclusion: We conclude that using the VMAT technique in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer can significantly reduce radiation doses to the heart and LAD, potentially reducing cardiac risk. For all patients, the cardiac doses are considerably decreased for all dose levels without compromising the dose coverage to PTV, which is an advantage over IMRT and 3DCRT","PeriodicalId":21672,"journal":{"name":"ScienceRise: Medical Science","volume":"56 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric evaluation of cardiac and left anterior descending artery dose in patients with left-sided breast cancer treated by different techniques of hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conservative surgery\",\"authors\":\"Nindra Armugam, Zohaib Saleem, Chandipriya Veluru, E. Ramanjaneyulu\",\"doi\":\"10.15587/2519-4798.2022.265543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aims: to dosimetrically evaluate the dose to the heart and left anterior descending artery in left-sided early breast cases using different techniques. \\nMaterials and methods: Prospective observational/analytical study done in cases of left-sided BCS referred for adjuvant RT in 54 patients. Patients who underwent left-sided BCS (breast conservative surgery), patients aged between 18- and 75 years performance status ECOG 0-2, histological confirmed DCIS, Invasive Breast Cancer-Stage 1, 2, 3, patients without any evidence of metastatic disease Irrespective of hormonal receptor and HER-2 neu status are included in the study. \\nResults: All the 3 parameters for LAD showed the highest doses with 3DCRT and lowest with VMAT. Thus our study favoured VMAT (p<0.01) as the planning technique to achieve the least doses of LAD. However, for the heart, there was no statistically significant difference between 3DCRT and IMRT (p=0.349) for the average mean dose (Gy). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference between 3DCRT Vs VMAT and IMRT Vs VMAT (95 % CI, p<0.01), again favouring VMAT as the choice of planning technique. The average heart max dose(Gy) and average heart V20(%) showed statistically significant benefits with VMAT (p<0.01). There was a statistically significant benefit (p<0.000) with VMAT for both LV parameters. At the same time, there was a statistically significant benefit in terms of ipsilateral lung dose with VMAT(p<0.000), the dose to the right lung, right breast and favoured 3DCRT (p<0.01). PTV95 % (Gy) by 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT in our study is 41.01, 41.96, and 41.76, respectively. Though the difference between the 3 techniques seems meagre, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.012) favouring IMRT. \\nConclusion: We conclude that using the VMAT technique in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer can significantly reduce radiation doses to the heart and LAD, potentially reducing cardiac risk. For all patients, the cardiac doses are considerably decreased for all dose levels without compromising the dose coverage to PTV, which is an advantage over IMRT and 3DCRT\",\"PeriodicalId\":21672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ScienceRise: Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"56 5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ScienceRise: Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2022.265543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceRise: Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2022.265543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对不同治疗方法对早期左乳患者心脏及左前降支的剂量进行剂量学评价。材料和方法:对54例左侧BCS患者进行辅助RT的前瞻性观察/分析研究。接受左侧BCS(乳房保守手术)的患者,年龄在18- 75岁之间的患者,ECOG 0-2,组织学证实的DCIS,浸润性乳腺癌- 1、2、3期,无任何转移性疾病证据的患者,无论激素受体和HER-2新状态如何,均纳入研究。结果:LAD 3项指标均显示3DCRT剂量最高,VMAT剂量最低。因此,我们的研究倾向于VMAT (p<0.01)作为实现最小LAD剂量的计划技术。然而,对于心脏,3DCRT和IMRT的平均剂量(Gy)无统计学差异(p=0.349)。另一方面,3DCRT Vs VMAT与IMRT Vs VMAT之间的差异有统计学意义(95% CI, p<0.01),再次倾向于VMAT作为计划技术的选择。平均心脏最大剂量(Gy)和平均心脏V20(%)显示VMAT有统计学意义(p<0.01)。VMAT在两个LV参数上都有统计学上显著的获益(p<0.000)。同时,VMAT组的同侧肺剂量(p<0.000)、对右肺、右乳及3DCRT的剂量(p<0.01)均有统计学意义。本研究3DCRT、IMRT和VMAT的ptv95% (Gy)分别为41.01、41.96和41.76。虽然这三种技术之间的差异似乎微不足道,但有统计学意义上的显著差异(p<0.012)有利于IMRT。结论:VMAT技术用于左侧乳腺癌放疗可显著降低对心脏和LAD的辐射剂量,潜在降低心脏风险。对于所有患者,在所有剂量水平下,心脏剂量都大大降低,而不影响PTV的剂量覆盖,这比IMRT和3DCRT有优势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dosimetric evaluation of cardiac and left anterior descending artery dose in patients with left-sided breast cancer treated by different techniques of hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conservative surgery
The aims: to dosimetrically evaluate the dose to the heart and left anterior descending artery in left-sided early breast cases using different techniques. Materials and methods: Prospective observational/analytical study done in cases of left-sided BCS referred for adjuvant RT in 54 patients. Patients who underwent left-sided BCS (breast conservative surgery), patients aged between 18- and 75 years performance status ECOG 0-2, histological confirmed DCIS, Invasive Breast Cancer-Stage 1, 2, 3, patients without any evidence of metastatic disease Irrespective of hormonal receptor and HER-2 neu status are included in the study. Results: All the 3 parameters for LAD showed the highest doses with 3DCRT and lowest with VMAT. Thus our study favoured VMAT (p<0.01) as the planning technique to achieve the least doses of LAD. However, for the heart, there was no statistically significant difference between 3DCRT and IMRT (p=0.349) for the average mean dose (Gy). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference between 3DCRT Vs VMAT and IMRT Vs VMAT (95 % CI, p<0.01), again favouring VMAT as the choice of planning technique. The average heart max dose(Gy) and average heart V20(%) showed statistically significant benefits with VMAT (p<0.01). There was a statistically significant benefit (p<0.000) with VMAT for both LV parameters. At the same time, there was a statistically significant benefit in terms of ipsilateral lung dose with VMAT(p<0.000), the dose to the right lung, right breast and favoured 3DCRT (p<0.01). PTV95 % (Gy) by 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT in our study is 41.01, 41.96, and 41.76, respectively. Though the difference between the 3 techniques seems meagre, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.012) favouring IMRT. Conclusion: We conclude that using the VMAT technique in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer can significantly reduce radiation doses to the heart and LAD, potentially reducing cardiac risk. For all patients, the cardiac doses are considerably decreased for all dose levels without compromising the dose coverage to PTV, which is an advantage over IMRT and 3DCRT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of exhaled breath condensate in patients with asthma and recurrent wheezing Sacrococcygeal pilonidal cyst with the disease onset as an anterior perianal abscess: a clinical case Body mass index, lipid profile, and endothelial dysfunction gene polymorphism in women with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia Assessment of the implantation window and embryonic factor impact to the treatment of recurrent implantation failure (RIF). A prospective study Improvement of the methods of stopping nose bleeds in patients under antithrombotic therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1