{"title":"二恶英暴露与2型糖尿病:病例对照研究","authors":"Shaw Watanabe, M. Morioka, T. Hirai, S. Mizuno","doi":"10.3793/JAAM.4.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: Relationship between dioxin exposure and diabetes mellitus (DM) has been in debate. Our cross-sectional study suggested that low-level dioxin exposure may cause type 2 diabetes in a general population. A case control study was performed to confirm the risk of dioxins. DESIGN and METHODS: 60 DM patients and 60 controls were selected for the case control study to detect the risk of dioxins for type 2 diabetes mellitus. After performing 75 g GTT, 56 DM, 12 IGT and 49 Control were grouped. In addition to the routine physical examination, questionnaire for life habits, past illness, family history and others were performed. 70 ml blood was collected for hematological and biochemical test, and measurement of 7 polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD), 10 polychloro-dibenzofurans (PCDF), and 12 coplanar polychlorobiphenyl (PCB). Concentration of dioxin congeners and their TEQ were used for regression factor analysis and logistic regression analysis to detect the risk of dioxins by SPSS. RESULTS: Total blood dioxin level was 23.4 ± 11.2 in Control, 30.8 ± 11.5 in IGT and 33.7 ± 13.7 pg TEQ/g lipid in DM. Logistic regression analysis revealed that family history (OR=20.4) and 4 of 5 dioxin factors (OR=2.2-2.8) had significant odds ratio. Crude congener concentration and their TEQ yielded the similar results. Other variables did not show significant odds ratio. Adverse effects of dioxins on TNFalpha, NEFA, adiponectin, and leptin were found. CONCLUSION: DM and IGT patients showed higher dioxin level compared to Control. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the exposure to both PCB and PCDD/PCDF showed significant effect.","PeriodicalId":86085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of anti-aging medicine","volume":"82 3-4 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dioxin exposure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Case control study\",\"authors\":\"Shaw Watanabe, M. Morioka, T. Hirai, S. Mizuno\",\"doi\":\"10.3793/JAAM.4.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES: Relationship between dioxin exposure and diabetes mellitus (DM) has been in debate. Our cross-sectional study suggested that low-level dioxin exposure may cause type 2 diabetes in a general population. A case control study was performed to confirm the risk of dioxins. DESIGN and METHODS: 60 DM patients and 60 controls were selected for the case control study to detect the risk of dioxins for type 2 diabetes mellitus. After performing 75 g GTT, 56 DM, 12 IGT and 49 Control were grouped. In addition to the routine physical examination, questionnaire for life habits, past illness, family history and others were performed. 70 ml blood was collected for hematological and biochemical test, and measurement of 7 polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD), 10 polychloro-dibenzofurans (PCDF), and 12 coplanar polychlorobiphenyl (PCB). Concentration of dioxin congeners and their TEQ were used for regression factor analysis and logistic regression analysis to detect the risk of dioxins by SPSS. RESULTS: Total blood dioxin level was 23.4 ± 11.2 in Control, 30.8 ± 11.5 in IGT and 33.7 ± 13.7 pg TEQ/g lipid in DM. Logistic regression analysis revealed that family history (OR=20.4) and 4 of 5 dioxin factors (OR=2.2-2.8) had significant odds ratio. Crude congener concentration and their TEQ yielded the similar results. Other variables did not show significant odds ratio. Adverse effects of dioxins on TNFalpha, NEFA, adiponectin, and leptin were found. CONCLUSION: DM and IGT patients showed higher dioxin level compared to Control. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the exposure to both PCB and PCDD/PCDF showed significant effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of anti-aging medicine\",\"volume\":\"82 3-4 1\",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of anti-aging medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3793/JAAM.4.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of anti-aging medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3793/JAAM.4.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:二恶英暴露与糖尿病(DM)之间的关系一直存在争议。我们的横断面研究表明,在一般人群中,低水平的二恶英暴露可能导致2型糖尿病。进行了病例对照研究,以确认二恶英的风险。设计与方法:选择60例糖尿病患者和60例对照进行病例对照研究,检测2型糖尿病患者二恶英的风险。饲喂75 g GTT后,DM 56只,IGT 12只,对照组49只。除常规体检外,还进行了生活习惯、既往病史、家族史等问卷调查。采集血液70 ml,进行血液学和生化检测,检测7种多氯二苯并对二恶英(PCDD)、10种多氯二苯并呋喃(PCDF)、12种共面多氯联苯(PCB)。采用SPSS软件对二恶英同系物浓度及其TEQ进行回归因子分析和logistic回归分析,检测二恶英的危害程度。结果:对照组血总二恶英水平为23.4±11.2,IGT组为30.8±11.5,DM组为33.7±13.7 pg TEQ/g脂质。Logistic回归分析显示,家族史(OR=20.4)和5个二恶英因素中的4个(OR=2.2 ~ 2.8)具有显著优势比。原油同系物浓度及其TEQ也得到了相似的结果。其他变量的比值比均不显著。发现二恶英对TNFalpha、NEFA、脂联素和瘦素的不良影响。结论:糖尿病和IGT患者二恶英水平高于对照组。Logistic回归分析显示,多氯联苯和PCDD/PCDF均有显著影响。
Dioxin exposure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Case control study
OBJECTIVES: Relationship between dioxin exposure and diabetes mellitus (DM) has been in debate. Our cross-sectional study suggested that low-level dioxin exposure may cause type 2 diabetes in a general population. A case control study was performed to confirm the risk of dioxins. DESIGN and METHODS: 60 DM patients and 60 controls were selected for the case control study to detect the risk of dioxins for type 2 diabetes mellitus. After performing 75 g GTT, 56 DM, 12 IGT and 49 Control were grouped. In addition to the routine physical examination, questionnaire for life habits, past illness, family history and others were performed. 70 ml blood was collected for hematological and biochemical test, and measurement of 7 polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD), 10 polychloro-dibenzofurans (PCDF), and 12 coplanar polychlorobiphenyl (PCB). Concentration of dioxin congeners and their TEQ were used for regression factor analysis and logistic regression analysis to detect the risk of dioxins by SPSS. RESULTS: Total blood dioxin level was 23.4 ± 11.2 in Control, 30.8 ± 11.5 in IGT and 33.7 ± 13.7 pg TEQ/g lipid in DM. Logistic regression analysis revealed that family history (OR=20.4) and 4 of 5 dioxin factors (OR=2.2-2.8) had significant odds ratio. Crude congener concentration and their TEQ yielded the similar results. Other variables did not show significant odds ratio. Adverse effects of dioxins on TNFalpha, NEFA, adiponectin, and leptin were found. CONCLUSION: DM and IGT patients showed higher dioxin level compared to Control. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the exposure to both PCB and PCDD/PCDF showed significant effect.