美国证券交易委员会批准社交媒体信息传播的效果

Jack W. Dorminey, Richard B. Dull, Ludwig Christian Schaupp
{"title":"美国证券交易委员会批准社交媒体信息传播的效果","authors":"Jack W. Dorminey,&nbsp;Richard B. Dull,&nbsp;Ludwig Christian Schaupp","doi":"10.1016/j.racreg.2015.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In April 2013, the SEC provided explicit guidance to public companies regarding social media use for material disclosures. This paper examines the effect of regulatory approval on the market reaction to financial disclosures distributed by firms via social media. The use of social media to disseminate information may lead to broader market interest in the stock. Social media use by firms is explored in three time periods: (1) prior to public SEC scrutiny of social media, (2) after the SEC filed a formal complaint about the use of social media, and (3) after the April 2013 guidance. The analysis demonstrates a positive association between social media use and market reaction as evidenced in trading volume. Second, the association between social media use by firms and trading volume is greatest following the SEC's guidance. Third, social media are used more extensively by disclosing firms in the period following explicit SEC guidance permitting its use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101074,"journal":{"name":"Research in Accounting Regulation","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2015.09.007","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of SEC approval of social media for information dissemination\",\"authors\":\"Jack W. Dorminey,&nbsp;Richard B. Dull,&nbsp;Ludwig Christian Schaupp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.racreg.2015.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In April 2013, the SEC provided explicit guidance to public companies regarding social media use for material disclosures. This paper examines the effect of regulatory approval on the market reaction to financial disclosures distributed by firms via social media. The use of social media to disseminate information may lead to broader market interest in the stock. Social media use by firms is explored in three time periods: (1) prior to public SEC scrutiny of social media, (2) after the SEC filed a formal complaint about the use of social media, and (3) after the April 2013 guidance. The analysis demonstrates a positive association between social media use and market reaction as evidenced in trading volume. Second, the association between social media use by firms and trading volume is greatest following the SEC's guidance. Third, social media are used more extensively by disclosing firms in the period following explicit SEC guidance permitting its use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 165-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2015.09.007\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045715000363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Accounting Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045715000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

2013年4月,美国证券交易委员会就使用社交媒体进行重大披露向上市公司提供了明确指导。本文考察了监管批准对市场对公司通过社交媒体发布的财务信息披露的反应的影响。使用社交媒体传播信息可能会导致更广泛的市场对股票的兴趣。公司对社交媒体的使用分为三个时间段:(1)在美国证券交易委员会对社交媒体进行公开审查之前,(2)在美国证券交易委员会对社交媒体的使用提出正式投诉之后,以及(3)在2013年4月指导之后。分析表明,社交媒体的使用与市场反应之间存在正相关关系,这一点在交易量中得到了证明。其次,在美国证券交易委员会的指导下,公司使用社交媒体与交易量之间的关联最大。第三,在美国证券交易委员会明确指导允许使用社交媒体之后,披露公司更广泛地使用社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of SEC approval of social media for information dissemination

In April 2013, the SEC provided explicit guidance to public companies regarding social media use for material disclosures. This paper examines the effect of regulatory approval on the market reaction to financial disclosures distributed by firms via social media. The use of social media to disseminate information may lead to broader market interest in the stock. Social media use by firms is explored in three time periods: (1) prior to public SEC scrutiny of social media, (2) after the SEC filed a formal complaint about the use of social media, and (3) after the April 2013 guidance. The analysis demonstrates a positive association between social media use and market reaction as evidenced in trading volume. Second, the association between social media use by firms and trading volume is greatest following the SEC's guidance. Third, social media are used more extensively by disclosing firms in the period following explicit SEC guidance permitting its use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Value relevance of customer-related intangible assets Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K. Financial statement comparability and segment disclosure The mitigation of high-growth-related accounting distortions after sarbanes-oxley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1