反思印尼的差异政治

T. J. Lan
{"title":"反思印尼的差异政治","authors":"T. J. Lan","doi":"10.7454/ai.v41i1.12664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whilst Indonesia was founded on the principle of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika , the politics of difference has not prevailed as the governing principle in law, society and polity. Instead, domination of the powerful has claimed of assuming the right to govern. During the Suharto’s New Order, the military dictatorship dominated Indonesia for more than three decades with complete impunity whereas in the post‐ reformasi era, majority‐minority paradigm seems to rule the country. In both contexts, the rule of law has never been the top priority. Rather, the state of exception, as Carl Schmitt coins, governs and even condones the majority‐minority paradigm. As result the Indonesia’s diversity in ethnicity, religion and class has been subjected to the domination of the majority and its narrative. Papua is one of the cases.","PeriodicalId":8156,"journal":{"name":"Antropologi Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the Politics of Difference in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"T. J. Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/ai.v41i1.12664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whilst Indonesia was founded on the principle of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika , the politics of difference has not prevailed as the governing principle in law, society and polity. Instead, domination of the powerful has claimed of assuming the right to govern. During the Suharto’s New Order, the military dictatorship dominated Indonesia for more than three decades with complete impunity whereas in the post‐ reformasi era, majority‐minority paradigm seems to rule the country. In both contexts, the rule of law has never been the top priority. Rather, the state of exception, as Carl Schmitt coins, governs and even condones the majority‐minority paradigm. As result the Indonesia’s diversity in ethnicity, religion and class has been subjected to the domination of the majority and its narrative. Papua is one of the cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antropologi Indonesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antropologi Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v41i1.12664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antropologi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v41i1.12664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然印度尼西亚是建立在平等原则基础上的,但差异政治并没有成为法律、社会和政治的主导原则。相反,强者的统治声称自己拥有统治的权利。在苏哈托的新秩序时期,军事独裁统治印尼超过30年,完全不受惩罚,而在后改革时代,多数-少数范式似乎统治着这个国家。在这两种情况下,法治从来都不是重中之重。相反,正如卡尔·施密特(Carl Schmitt)所提出的,例外状态支配甚至纵容了多数-少数范式。结果,印度尼西亚在种族、宗教和阶级方面的多样性受到多数人及其叙述的支配。巴布亚就是其中一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking the Politics of Difference in Indonesia
Whilst Indonesia was founded on the principle of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika , the politics of difference has not prevailed as the governing principle in law, society and polity. Instead, domination of the powerful has claimed of assuming the right to govern. During the Suharto’s New Order, the military dictatorship dominated Indonesia for more than three decades with complete impunity whereas in the post‐ reformasi era, majority‐minority paradigm seems to rule the country. In both contexts, the rule of law has never been the top priority. Rather, the state of exception, as Carl Schmitt coins, governs and even condones the majority‐minority paradigm. As result the Indonesia’s diversity in ethnicity, religion and class has been subjected to the domination of the majority and its narrative. Papua is one of the cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sando Pea: Between Tradition and Health Challenge among Kaluppini Indigenous People Pengetahuan Tradisional tentang Kesehatan dan Pemenuhan Hak Kesehatan Reproduksi Perempuan Bawean The Dynamics of Abortion Treatment as an Effort of Harmonization between the Modern and the Traditional Medical System Papua Under The State of Exception Rethinking the Politics of Difference in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1