走向变革的系统理论:管理棘手问题的高杠杆策略

Ryan J. A. Murphy, Peter Jones
{"title":"走向变革的系统理论:管理棘手问题的高杠杆策略","authors":"Ryan J. A. Murphy,&nbsp;Peter Jones","doi":"10.1111/dmj.12068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Design and design management are increasingly called to respond to the world’s complex, dynamic problems. Yet, no standards or methodology exists to help designers understand, model, and design solutions for complex wicked problems. Program theory and social innovation promote the use of theory of change models to develop linear pathways of outcomes to show how a change initiative will have its desired effects. However, critics of these models accuse them of being simplistic and reductively linear. Systems thinking models use influence maps and causal loop diagrams to create maps of systems that show their behaviour in their full, dynamic complexity. However, these diagrams are sometimes complicated, overwhelming to read and therefore impractical. In this paper, we combine these tools with a novel technique from systemic design called “leverage analysis” to help identify crucial features of a complex problem and help designers develop practical theories of systemic change.</p>","PeriodicalId":100367,"journal":{"name":"Design Management Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"49-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Systemic Theories of Change: High-Leverage Strategies for Managing Wicked Problems\",\"authors\":\"Ryan J. A. Murphy,&nbsp;Peter Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmj.12068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Design and design management are increasingly called to respond to the world’s complex, dynamic problems. Yet, no standards or methodology exists to help designers understand, model, and design solutions for complex wicked problems. Program theory and social innovation promote the use of theory of change models to develop linear pathways of outcomes to show how a change initiative will have its desired effects. However, critics of these models accuse them of being simplistic and reductively linear. Systems thinking models use influence maps and causal loop diagrams to create maps of systems that show their behaviour in their full, dynamic complexity. However, these diagrams are sometimes complicated, overwhelming to read and therefore impractical. In this paper, we combine these tools with a novel technique from systemic design called “leverage analysis” to help identify crucial features of a complex problem and help designers develop practical theories of systemic change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"49-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmj.12068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmj.12068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

设计和设计管理越来越多地被要求回应世界上复杂的、动态的问题。然而,没有任何标准或方法可以帮助设计师理解、建模和设计复杂棘手问题的解决方案。项目理论和社会创新促进了变革理论模型的使用,以发展结果的线性路径,以显示变革倡议将如何产生预期的效果。然而,这些模型的批评者指责它们过于简单化,过于线性化。系统思维模型使用影响图和因果循环图来创建系统图,以显示其完整的动态复杂性行为。然而,这些图表有时很复杂,难以阅读,因此不切实际。在本文中,我们将这些工具与来自系统设计的一种称为“杠杆分析”的新技术结合起来,以帮助识别复杂问题的关键特征,并帮助设计师开发系统变化的实用理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards Systemic Theories of Change: High-Leverage Strategies for Managing Wicked Problems

Design and design management are increasingly called to respond to the world’s complex, dynamic problems. Yet, no standards or methodology exists to help designers understand, model, and design solutions for complex wicked problems. Program theory and social innovation promote the use of theory of change models to develop linear pathways of outcomes to show how a change initiative will have its desired effects. However, critics of these models accuse them of being simplistic and reductively linear. Systems thinking models use influence maps and causal loop diagrams to create maps of systems that show their behaviour in their full, dynamic complexity. However, these diagrams are sometimes complicated, overwhelming to read and therefore impractical. In this paper, we combine these tools with a novel technique from systemic design called “leverage analysis” to help identify crucial features of a complex problem and help designers develop practical theories of systemic change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Design Thinking and AI: A New Frontier for Designing Human-Centered AI Solutions From the President Designing Systems in a Fine-Grained and Inclusive Way, by Integrating Service Design within Futures Studies and Foresight Using Theory of Change to Support Participatory Visual Mapping in Urban Transformation Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1