非晶材料x射线衍射分析方法的特点及相互关系

H. Hasegawa, I. Yasui
{"title":"非晶材料x射线衍射分析方法的特点及相互关系","authors":"H. Hasegawa, I. Yasui","doi":"10.2109/JCERSJ1950.94.1092_842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two fundamental methods have been used for X-ray structure analysis of amorphous materials, i.e., the intensity comparison method and radial distribution analysis. There is an opinion that Fourier conversion from raw intensity data to a radial distribution function (RDF) introduces some errors and a comparison on intensity curves is, therefore, more exact. The present calculations have indicated that an RDF obtained from an intensity curve can be exactly re-transformed to the original intensity curve, if the upper range of Fourier-integral is sufficiently high. This means that no information disappears or any other spurious information is not added in the process of transformation between intensity data and an RDF. On the other hand, direct calculation of intensity with the Debye equation inevitably introduces truncation errors, unless some approximations are used. When the comparison on intensity curves is requested, it is desirable to transform an RDF obtained from a structure model to an intensity curve. Some distortions introduced in RDFs are offset each other in an observed and calculated RDFs and usually need not to be considered in the pair function method. There is, however, another opinion that some distortions introduced in RDFs difuse the part of small atomic distances and a comparison in intensity curves is, therefore, necessary. The present calculations indicate that atomic pairs with small inter-atomic distances can be equally compared in RDFs as well as in intensity curves as for oxide, chalcogenide or halide glasses. In conclusion, the present calculations have proved that errors are not intermixed in transformation process between an intensity curve and an RDF and that the same level of assessment of the structural models is possible either in intensity curves or in RDFs, although the intensity comparison method by use of the Debye equation can not avoid the intermixture of truncation errors, unless some approximations are used.","PeriodicalId":17274,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Features and Relationship between Some Methods of X-ray Diffraction Analysis for Amorphous Materials\",\"authors\":\"H. Hasegawa, I. Yasui\",\"doi\":\"10.2109/JCERSJ1950.94.1092_842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two fundamental methods have been used for X-ray structure analysis of amorphous materials, i.e., the intensity comparison method and radial distribution analysis. There is an opinion that Fourier conversion from raw intensity data to a radial distribution function (RDF) introduces some errors and a comparison on intensity curves is, therefore, more exact. The present calculations have indicated that an RDF obtained from an intensity curve can be exactly re-transformed to the original intensity curve, if the upper range of Fourier-integral is sufficiently high. This means that no information disappears or any other spurious information is not added in the process of transformation between intensity data and an RDF. On the other hand, direct calculation of intensity with the Debye equation inevitably introduces truncation errors, unless some approximations are used. When the comparison on intensity curves is requested, it is desirable to transform an RDF obtained from a structure model to an intensity curve. Some distortions introduced in RDFs are offset each other in an observed and calculated RDFs and usually need not to be considered in the pair function method. There is, however, another opinion that some distortions introduced in RDFs difuse the part of small atomic distances and a comparison in intensity curves is, therefore, necessary. The present calculations indicate that atomic pairs with small inter-atomic distances can be equally compared in RDFs as well as in intensity curves as for oxide, chalcogenide or halide glasses. In conclusion, the present calculations have proved that errors are not intermixed in transformation process between an intensity curve and an RDF and that the same level of assessment of the structural models is possible either in intensity curves or in RDFs, although the intensity comparison method by use of the Debye equation can not avoid the intermixture of truncation errors, unless some approximations are used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2109/JCERSJ1950.94.1092_842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2109/JCERSJ1950.94.1092_842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非晶材料的x射线结构分析有两种基本方法,即强度比较法和径向分布分析法。有一种观点认为,从原始强度数据到径向分布函数(RDF)的傅里叶转换引入了一些误差,因此强度曲线的比较更为精确。计算表明,如果傅里叶积分的上界足够大,从强度曲线得到的RDF可以精确地重新转换为原始强度曲线。这意味着在强度数据和RDF之间的转换过程中没有信息消失或添加任何其他虚假信息。另一方面,用Debye方程直接计算强度不可避免地引入截断误差,除非使用一些近似值。当需要对强度曲线进行比较时,需要将由结构模型得到的RDF转换为强度曲线。在rdf中引入的一些畸变在观测和计算的rdf中相互抵消,在对函数方法中通常不需要考虑。然而,也有另一种观点认为,在rdf中引入的一些畸变分散了小原子距离的部分,因此有必要在强度曲线中进行比较。目前的计算表明,原子间距离小的原子对可以在rdf和强度曲线中与氧化玻璃、硫系玻璃或卤化物玻璃进行同样的比较。总之,本文的计算证明了在强度曲线和RDF之间的转换过程中,误差是不混合的,尽管使用Debye方程的强度比较方法不能避免截断误差的混合,但在强度曲线和RDF中都可以对结构模型进行相同水平的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Features and Relationship between Some Methods of X-ray Diffraction Analysis for Amorphous Materials
Two fundamental methods have been used for X-ray structure analysis of amorphous materials, i.e., the intensity comparison method and radial distribution analysis. There is an opinion that Fourier conversion from raw intensity data to a radial distribution function (RDF) introduces some errors and a comparison on intensity curves is, therefore, more exact. The present calculations have indicated that an RDF obtained from an intensity curve can be exactly re-transformed to the original intensity curve, if the upper range of Fourier-integral is sufficiently high. This means that no information disappears or any other spurious information is not added in the process of transformation between intensity data and an RDF. On the other hand, direct calculation of intensity with the Debye equation inevitably introduces truncation errors, unless some approximations are used. When the comparison on intensity curves is requested, it is desirable to transform an RDF obtained from a structure model to an intensity curve. Some distortions introduced in RDFs are offset each other in an observed and calculated RDFs and usually need not to be considered in the pair function method. There is, however, another opinion that some distortions introduced in RDFs difuse the part of small atomic distances and a comparison in intensity curves is, therefore, necessary. The present calculations indicate that atomic pairs with small inter-atomic distances can be equally compared in RDFs as well as in intensity curves as for oxide, chalcogenide or halide glasses. In conclusion, the present calculations have proved that errors are not intermixed in transformation process between an intensity curve and an RDF and that the same level of assessment of the structural models is possible either in intensity curves or in RDFs, although the intensity comparison method by use of the Debye equation can not avoid the intermixture of truncation errors, unless some approximations are used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Carbon Monoxide on the Sintering of SiC Whisker-Zirconia Composite Preparation and Properties of LiTaO3 Thin Films by Dipping Method Distribution of Impregnated Component and Nonuniformity of Colloidal Silica in Porous Glass Synthesis of High-Purity ZrF4 by Chemical Vapour Deposition Si//3N//4 FORMATION IN THE CARBOTHERMAL REDUCTION PROCESS OF A MAGADIITE-POLYACRYLONITRILE INTERCALATION COMPOUND.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1