对他人心灵的怀疑:命题的和客观的

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.1111/phin.12322
Raja Bahlul
{"title":"对他人心灵的怀疑:命题的和客观的","authors":"Raja Bahlul","doi":"10.1111/phin.12322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I distinguish between two kinds of knowledge of other minds: a propositional kind, whereby one may say, for example, that “We can see that he is in pain ,” and an objectual (object-related) kind which seems to be presupposed by knowledge claims about, for example, his present feeling of pain . I will suggest that two sceptical problems arise in connection with these two kinds of knowledge, respectively. The burden of my argument will be to show that while scepticism about propositional knowledge may be amenable to a satisfactory solution, the only route to take with scepticism about objectual knowledge is dissolution.","PeriodicalId":47112,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scepticism About Other Minds: Propositional and Objectual\",\"authors\":\"Raja Bahlul\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phin.12322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I distinguish between two kinds of knowledge of other minds: a propositional kind, whereby one may say, for example, that “We can see that he is in pain ,” and an objectual (object-related) kind which seems to be presupposed by knowledge claims about, for example, his present feeling of pain . I will suggest that two sceptical problems arise in connection with these two kinds of knowledge, respectively. The burden of my argument will be to show that while scepticism about propositional knowledge may be amenable to a satisfactory solution, the only route to take with scepticism about objectual knowledge is dissolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12322\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我将区分两种关于他人心灵的知识:一种是命题性的知识,例如,人们可以说"我们可以看到他在痛苦中",另一种是客观的(客体相关的)知识,它似乎是由知识主张预设的,例如,他目前的痛苦感觉。我将提出两个分别与这两种知识有关的怀疑问题。我的论点的重点是要说明,虽然关于命题知识的怀疑主义可能有一个令人满意的解决方案,但是关于客观知识的怀疑主义所采取的唯一途径是解散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scepticism About Other Minds: Propositional and Objectual
In this paper, I distinguish between two kinds of knowledge of other minds: a propositional kind, whereby one may say, for example, that “We can see that he is in pain ,” and an objectual (object-related) kind which seems to be presupposed by knowledge claims about, for example, his present feeling of pain . I will suggest that two sceptical problems arise in connection with these two kinds of knowledge, respectively. The burden of my argument will be to show that while scepticism about propositional knowledge may be amenable to a satisfactory solution, the only route to take with scepticism about objectual knowledge is dissolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
66.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophical Investigations features articles in every branch of philosophy. Whether focusing on traditional or on new aspects of the subject, it offers thought-provoking articles and maintains a lively readership with an acclaimed discussion section and wide-ranging book reviews. Special issues are published on topics of current philosophical interest.
期刊最新文献
Wittgenstein's critical Philosophy of Mathematical Practice Geometric diagrams as an effective notation Language, Mind and Value By SeverinSchroeder, London: Anthem. 2024 Is the wrongness of murder a universal moral hinge? Wittgenstein on mathematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1