深入分析在科学研究中的应用趋势:系统综述

Victor Hugo Silva-Blancas, J. M. Álvarez-Alvarado, A. Herrera-Navarro, J. Rodríguez-Reséndíz
{"title":"深入分析在科学研究中的应用趋势:系统综述","authors":"Victor Hugo Silva-Blancas, J. M. Álvarez-Alvarado, A. Herrera-Navarro, J. Rodríguez-Reséndíz","doi":"10.3390/technologies11040112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the fact that new server technologies are coming to market, it is necessary to update or create new methodologies for data analysis and exploitation. Applied methodologies go from decision tree categorization to artificial neural networks (ANN) usage, which implement artificial intelligence (AI) for decision making. One of the least used strategies is drill-down analysis (DD), belonging to the decision trees subcategory, which because of not having AI resources has lost interest among researchers. However, its easy implementation makes it a suitable tool for database processing systems. This research has developed a systematic review to understand the prospective of DD analysis on scientific literature in order to establish a knowledge platform and establish if it is convenient to drive it to integration with superior methodologies, as it would be those based on ANN, and produce a better diagnosis in future works. A total of 80 scientific articles were reviewed from 1997 to 2023, showing a high frequency in 2021 and experimental as the predominant methodology. From a total of 100 problems solved, 42% were using the experimental methodology, 34% descriptive, 17% comparative, and just 7% post facto. We detected 14 unsolved problems, from which 50% fall in the experimental area. At the same time, by study type, methodologies included correlation studies, processes, decision trees, plain queries, granularity, and labeling. It was observed that just one work focuses on mathematics, which reduces new knowledge production expectations. Additionally, just one work manifested ANN usage.","PeriodicalId":22341,"journal":{"name":"Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tendency on the Application of Drill-Down Analysis in Scientific Studies: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Victor Hugo Silva-Blancas, J. M. Álvarez-Alvarado, A. Herrera-Navarro, J. Rodríguez-Reséndíz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/technologies11040112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the fact that new server technologies are coming to market, it is necessary to update or create new methodologies for data analysis and exploitation. Applied methodologies go from decision tree categorization to artificial neural networks (ANN) usage, which implement artificial intelligence (AI) for decision making. One of the least used strategies is drill-down analysis (DD), belonging to the decision trees subcategory, which because of not having AI resources has lost interest among researchers. However, its easy implementation makes it a suitable tool for database processing systems. This research has developed a systematic review to understand the prospective of DD analysis on scientific literature in order to establish a knowledge platform and establish if it is convenient to drive it to integration with superior methodologies, as it would be those based on ANN, and produce a better diagnosis in future works. A total of 80 scientific articles were reviewed from 1997 to 2023, showing a high frequency in 2021 and experimental as the predominant methodology. From a total of 100 problems solved, 42% were using the experimental methodology, 34% descriptive, 17% comparative, and just 7% post facto. We detected 14 unsolved problems, from which 50% fall in the experimental area. At the same time, by study type, methodologies included correlation studies, processes, decision trees, plain queries, granularity, and labeling. It was observed that just one work focuses on mathematics, which reduces new knowledge production expectations. Additionally, just one work manifested ANN usage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11040112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11040112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着新的服务器技术进入市场,有必要更新或创建用于数据分析和开发的新方法。应用的方法从决策树分类到人工神经网络(ANN)的使用,后者实现了人工智能(AI)的决策。其中使用最少的策略之一是下钻分析(DD),它属于决策树的子类别,由于缺乏人工智能资源而失去了研究人员的兴趣。然而,它的简单实现使它成为数据库处理系统的合适工具。本研究通过系统综述了解科学文献DD分析的前景,以建立一个知识平台,并确定是否便于推动其与基于人工神经网络的优越方法相结合,从而在未来的工作中更好地进行诊断。1997 - 2023年共回顾80篇科学论文,其中2021年频率较高,实验方法占主导地位。在总共解决的100个问题中,42%使用实验方法,34%使用描述性方法,17%使用比较方法,只有7%使用事后方法。我们发现了14个未解决的问题,其中50%落在实验区。同时,根据研究类型,方法包括相关性研究、过程、决策树、普通查询、粒度和标记。据观察,只有一部作品专注于数学,这降低了新知识生产的期望。此外,只有一项工作显示了人工神经网络的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tendency on the Application of Drill-Down Analysis in Scientific Studies: A Systematic Review
With the fact that new server technologies are coming to market, it is necessary to update or create new methodologies for data analysis and exploitation. Applied methodologies go from decision tree categorization to artificial neural networks (ANN) usage, which implement artificial intelligence (AI) for decision making. One of the least used strategies is drill-down analysis (DD), belonging to the decision trees subcategory, which because of not having AI resources has lost interest among researchers. However, its easy implementation makes it a suitable tool for database processing systems. This research has developed a systematic review to understand the prospective of DD analysis on scientific literature in order to establish a knowledge platform and establish if it is convenient to drive it to integration with superior methodologies, as it would be those based on ANN, and produce a better diagnosis in future works. A total of 80 scientific articles were reviewed from 1997 to 2023, showing a high frequency in 2021 and experimental as the predominant methodology. From a total of 100 problems solved, 42% were using the experimental methodology, 34% descriptive, 17% comparative, and just 7% post facto. We detected 14 unsolved problems, from which 50% fall in the experimental area. At the same time, by study type, methodologies included correlation studies, processes, decision trees, plain queries, granularity, and labeling. It was observed that just one work focuses on mathematics, which reduces new knowledge production expectations. Additionally, just one work manifested ANN usage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology in Forensic Sciences: Innovation and Precision Enhanced Energy Transfer Efficiency for IoT-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems in 6G Edge Networks with WPT-MIMO-NOMA Development of a Body Weight Support System Employing Model-Based System Engineering Methodology Nano-Level Additive Manufacturing: Condensed Review of Processes, Materials, and Industrial Applications Development of a New Prototype Paediatric Central Sleep Apnoea Monitor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1