{"title":"资优教育何去何从:混乱还是社区?","authors":"S. Peters","doi":"10.1177/00169862211066947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For anyone who puts pen to paper, there can be no greater compliment than when someone reads your work, except when that person then takes the time to think about it and respond. As part of this special issue, almost 50 people took the time to engage on the topic of equity in gifted education and respond to the ideas I offered (see Peters, 2022). It was a gift that left me humbled. Because of the number of commentaries and range of ideas offered, my goal in this final paper was not to respond or react to them individually. Instead, I printed them all out, spread them across the floor of my office, and tried to find areas of agreement that might help the field move forward. As many gifted education scholars and practitioners have long lamented, the existence of disproportional representation within gifted and talented programs has gone on for too long and the time has come for bold, collective action. Although they covered a range of topics, in reading through the commentaries, there appeared to be two broad areas in which most of authors agree:","PeriodicalId":47514,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Quarterly","volume":"21 1","pages":"163 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Does Gifted Education Go From Here: Chaos or Community?\",\"authors\":\"S. Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00169862211066947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For anyone who puts pen to paper, there can be no greater compliment than when someone reads your work, except when that person then takes the time to think about it and respond. As part of this special issue, almost 50 people took the time to engage on the topic of equity in gifted education and respond to the ideas I offered (see Peters, 2022). It was a gift that left me humbled. Because of the number of commentaries and range of ideas offered, my goal in this final paper was not to respond or react to them individually. Instead, I printed them all out, spread them across the floor of my office, and tried to find areas of agreement that might help the field move forward. As many gifted education scholars and practitioners have long lamented, the existence of disproportional representation within gifted and talented programs has gone on for too long and the time has come for bold, collective action. Although they covered a range of topics, in reading through the commentaries, there appeared to be two broad areas in which most of authors agree:\",\"PeriodicalId\":47514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted Child Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted Child Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211066947\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211066947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where Does Gifted Education Go From Here: Chaos or Community?
For anyone who puts pen to paper, there can be no greater compliment than when someone reads your work, except when that person then takes the time to think about it and respond. As part of this special issue, almost 50 people took the time to engage on the topic of equity in gifted education and respond to the ideas I offered (see Peters, 2022). It was a gift that left me humbled. Because of the number of commentaries and range of ideas offered, my goal in this final paper was not to respond or react to them individually. Instead, I printed them all out, spread them across the floor of my office, and tried to find areas of agreement that might help the field move forward. As many gifted education scholars and practitioners have long lamented, the existence of disproportional representation within gifted and talented programs has gone on for too long and the time has come for bold, collective action. Although they covered a range of topics, in reading through the commentaries, there appeared to be two broad areas in which most of authors agree:
期刊介绍:
Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.