测定印度贝蒂亚三级医院金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株的构成性和诱导性克林霉素耐药性

A. Jha, Kali Charan Rajak, Chandan Kumar Poddar, Shuvendu Das Gupta, Ramanand Kumar Pappu, M. Singh
{"title":"测定印度贝蒂亚三级医院金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株的构成性和诱导性克林霉素耐药性","authors":"A. Jha, Kali Charan Rajak, Chandan Kumar Poddar, Shuvendu Das Gupta, Ramanand Kumar Pappu, M. Singh","doi":"10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.11.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Clindamycin has been used to treat pneumonia and soft tissue and musculoskeletal infections due to MRSA. One important problem in Clindamycin treatment is the risk of clinical failure during therapy caused by MLSB inducible resistance. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) suggest D-test, which is a phenotypic showing technique for inducible Clindamycin resistance. Material and Methods: We analyzed antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. Methicillin resistance was detected with cefoxitin (30 μg) disk and inducible clindamycin resistance was unwavering in all erythromycin resistant isolate by using D-zone test. Results: 100 S. aureus isolate 37 (36.6%) were methicillin resistant (MRSA) and 63 (63.4%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). Although, mainstream of the MRSA isolates were imitative from pus samples 15, however, the S. aureus isolates imitative from post-operative wound infection were mainly MRSA 7. A total of 21 S. aureus isolates with iMLSB phenotype shown that they were 100% susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid, with modest sensitivity (71.14%) to gentamicin, cefuroxime and slightest sensitivity to (23.81%) doxycycline, (20.95%) ciprofloxacin. Conclusion: Outstanding to high happening of erythromycin resistance amongst S. aureus isolates, we recommend that D-zone test have to be regularly done in all laboratories for suitable recommendation of clindamycin and thus preventing appearance of inducible resistant strains and management failure.","PeriodicalId":13918,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determine Constitutive and Inducible Clindamycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates from Tertiary Care Hospital, Bettiah, India\",\"authors\":\"A. Jha, Kali Charan Rajak, Chandan Kumar Poddar, Shuvendu Das Gupta, Ramanand Kumar Pappu, M. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.11.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Clindamycin has been used to treat pneumonia and soft tissue and musculoskeletal infections due to MRSA. One important problem in Clindamycin treatment is the risk of clinical failure during therapy caused by MLSB inducible resistance. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) suggest D-test, which is a phenotypic showing technique for inducible Clindamycin resistance. Material and Methods: We analyzed antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. Methicillin resistance was detected with cefoxitin (30 μg) disk and inducible clindamycin resistance was unwavering in all erythromycin resistant isolate by using D-zone test. Results: 100 S. aureus isolate 37 (36.6%) were methicillin resistant (MRSA) and 63 (63.4%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). Although, mainstream of the MRSA isolates were imitative from pus samples 15, however, the S. aureus isolates imitative from post-operative wound infection were mainly MRSA 7. A total of 21 S. aureus isolates with iMLSB phenotype shown that they were 100% susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid, with modest sensitivity (71.14%) to gentamicin, cefuroxime and slightest sensitivity to (23.81%) doxycycline, (20.95%) ciprofloxacin. Conclusion: Outstanding to high happening of erythromycin resistance amongst S. aureus isolates, we recommend that D-zone test have to be regularly done in all laboratories for suitable recommendation of clindamycin and thus preventing appearance of inducible resistant strains and management failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.11.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.11.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

克林霉素已被用于治疗肺炎和由MRSA引起的软组织和肌肉骨骼感染。克林霉素治疗的一个重要问题是MLSB诱导耐药导致临床失败的风险。临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)建议采用D-test,这是一种诱导性克林霉素耐药的表型显示技术。材料与方法采用Kirby Bauer纸片扩散法进行药敏试验。采用头孢西丁(30 μg)膜片检测对甲氧西林的耐药性,采用d区试验对所有红霉素耐药菌株均无诱导克林霉素耐药性。结果:100株金黄色葡萄球菌为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA) 37株(36.6%),敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA) 63株(63.4%)。虽然主流的MRSA分离株为脓液标本的模拟菌株15,但从术后伤口感染中模拟的金黄色葡萄球菌主要是MRSA 7。21株具有iMLSB表型的金黄色葡萄球菌对万古霉素和利奈唑胺的敏感性为100%,对庆大霉素、头孢呋辛的敏感性中等(71.14%),对多西环素(23.81%)、环丙沙星(20.95%)的敏感性最低。结论:鉴于金黄色葡萄球菌对红霉素的高耐药性,建议各实验室定期进行d区试验,合理推荐克林霉素,防止诱导耐药菌株的出现和管理失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determine Constitutive and Inducible Clindamycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates from Tertiary Care Hospital, Bettiah, India
Introduction: Clindamycin has been used to treat pneumonia and soft tissue and musculoskeletal infections due to MRSA. One important problem in Clindamycin treatment is the risk of clinical failure during therapy caused by MLSB inducible resistance. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) suggest D-test, which is a phenotypic showing technique for inducible Clindamycin resistance. Material and Methods: We analyzed antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. Methicillin resistance was detected with cefoxitin (30 μg) disk and inducible clindamycin resistance was unwavering in all erythromycin resistant isolate by using D-zone test. Results: 100 S. aureus isolate 37 (36.6%) were methicillin resistant (MRSA) and 63 (63.4%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). Although, mainstream of the MRSA isolates were imitative from pus samples 15, however, the S. aureus isolates imitative from post-operative wound infection were mainly MRSA 7. A total of 21 S. aureus isolates with iMLSB phenotype shown that they were 100% susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid, with modest sensitivity (71.14%) to gentamicin, cefuroxime and slightest sensitivity to (23.81%) doxycycline, (20.95%) ciprofloxacin. Conclusion: Outstanding to high happening of erythromycin resistance amongst S. aureus isolates, we recommend that D-zone test have to be regularly done in all laboratories for suitable recommendation of clindamycin and thus preventing appearance of inducible resistant strains and management failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Vascular Disease Outcomes of Surgical Management of Floating Knee Injuries Hyperventilation Syndrome Foreign Body in Maxillary Deciduous First Molar – A Case Report ​ Screening for Peripheral Vascular Disease among Type 2 Diabetes Patients of Lower Socio Economic Status using Ankle Brachial Index - A Descriptive Cross Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1