中国情绪障碍门诊患者精神疾病内化耻辱感的测量

Meghan L. Smith, Lawrence H. Yang, Debbie Huang, K. Pike, C. Yuan, Zhen Wang
{"title":"中国情绪障碍门诊患者精神疾病内化耻辱感的测量","authors":"Meghan L. Smith, Lawrence H. Yang, Debbie Huang, K. Pike, C. Yuan, Zhen Wang","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2018.1442484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Internalized stigma is a barrier to mental health care in China, and stigma reduction is expected to promote treatment utilization, especially for mood disorders and schizophrenia. We aimed to identify the most common domains of internalized stigma of mental illness and to test the hypothesis that people with more severe mood disorders evidence more internalized stigma than those with less severe disorders. The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) was administered to 366 outpatients with various mood disorders in Shanghai. Reliability statistics were calculated and frequently-endorsed items were identified. The magnitude of internalized stigma was compared among diagnostic categories and among sociodemographic groups. Except for stigma resistance, the ISMI and its subscales had good internal consistency. Across subgroups, stereotype endorsement was most commonly reported. Bipolar (versus depressive) disorders, male gender, and less education were associated with more internalized stigma, especially social withdrawal. Contrasting findings in Western countries, those with family history of mental illness trended toward more internalized stigma. We conclude that anti-stigma interventions should focus on reducing social withdrawal and stereotype endorsement, especially for those with more severe mood disorders, males, less educated individuals, and those with family history of mental illness.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"522 - 535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring internalized stigma of mental illness among Chinese outpatients with mood disorders\",\"authors\":\"Meghan L. Smith, Lawrence H. Yang, Debbie Huang, K. Pike, C. Yuan, Zhen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17542863.2018.1442484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Internalized stigma is a barrier to mental health care in China, and stigma reduction is expected to promote treatment utilization, especially for mood disorders and schizophrenia. We aimed to identify the most common domains of internalized stigma of mental illness and to test the hypothesis that people with more severe mood disorders evidence more internalized stigma than those with less severe disorders. The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) was administered to 366 outpatients with various mood disorders in Shanghai. Reliability statistics were calculated and frequently-endorsed items were identified. The magnitude of internalized stigma was compared among diagnostic categories and among sociodemographic groups. Except for stigma resistance, the ISMI and its subscales had good internal consistency. Across subgroups, stereotype endorsement was most commonly reported. Bipolar (versus depressive) disorders, male gender, and less education were associated with more internalized stigma, especially social withdrawal. Contrasting findings in Western countries, those with family history of mental illness trended toward more internalized stigma. We conclude that anti-stigma interventions should focus on reducing social withdrawal and stereotype endorsement, especially for those with more severe mood disorders, males, less educated individuals, and those with family history of mental illness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"522 - 535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2018.1442484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2018.1442484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

内化病耻感是中国精神卫生保健的一个障碍,减少病耻感有望促进治疗的利用,特别是对情绪障碍和精神分裂症。我们的目的是确定精神疾病内化耻辱的最常见领域,并检验一个假设,即情绪障碍更严重的人比那些不太严重的人有更多的内化耻辱。对上海市366例各类情绪障碍门诊患者进行心理疾病内化污名(ISMI)测试。计算可靠性统计数据,并确定频繁认可的项目。在诊断类别和社会人口群体之间比较了内化耻辱的程度。除柱头抗性外,ISMI及其子量表具有较好的内部一致性。在各个小组中,刻板印象背书是最常见的。双相情感障碍(相对于抑郁症)、男性和受教育程度较低与内在化的耻辱感相关,尤其是社会退缩。与西方国家的调查结果相反,那些有精神疾病家族史的人倾向于更内化的耻辱。我们的结论是,反污名化干预应侧重于减少社会退缩和刻板印象背书,特别是对于那些更严重的情绪障碍、男性、受教育程度较低的个体和有精神疾病家族史的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring internalized stigma of mental illness among Chinese outpatients with mood disorders
ABSTRACT Internalized stigma is a barrier to mental health care in China, and stigma reduction is expected to promote treatment utilization, especially for mood disorders and schizophrenia. We aimed to identify the most common domains of internalized stigma of mental illness and to test the hypothesis that people with more severe mood disorders evidence more internalized stigma than those with less severe disorders. The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) was administered to 366 outpatients with various mood disorders in Shanghai. Reliability statistics were calculated and frequently-endorsed items were identified. The magnitude of internalized stigma was compared among diagnostic categories and among sociodemographic groups. Except for stigma resistance, the ISMI and its subscales had good internal consistency. Across subgroups, stereotype endorsement was most commonly reported. Bipolar (versus depressive) disorders, male gender, and less education were associated with more internalized stigma, especially social withdrawal. Contrasting findings in Western countries, those with family history of mental illness trended toward more internalized stigma. We conclude that anti-stigma interventions should focus on reducing social withdrawal and stereotype endorsement, especially for those with more severe mood disorders, males, less educated individuals, and those with family history of mental illness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
期刊最新文献
Acculturation, ethnic identity, and psychological well-being of Albanian-American immigrants in the United States Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children (AQC) in children and adolescents Psychometric properties of the Gabonese version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale among employees Disabled or Deaf? Investigating mental health clinicians’ knowledge of and attitude towards Deafness as a culture* Experiences of HIV stigma in rural Southern religious settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1