在实践中验证全威尔士Covid-19风险评估工具

Archit Singhal, Alan Abraham, Parag Singhal, D. Raje, K. Singhal
{"title":"在实践中验证全威尔士Covid-19风险评估工具","authors":"Archit Singhal, Alan Abraham, Parag Singhal, D. Raje, K. Singhal","doi":"10.38192/1.7.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nThe All-Wales Covid-19 Risk Assessment tool (WRA) was developed to support managers in undertaking individual risk assessments for employees in public facing work settings, and put in place appropriate mitigation. Although a tool for all employees, it’s development was prompted in part by the observation that Covid-19 was disproportionately affecting Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) employees, particularly those in health and social care settings.  This simple, self-administered tool estimates an individual’s risk of severe Covid-19 disease by scoring  personal risk factors, based on those previously identified in the emerging literature. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this tool, by measuring concordance between an individual respondants self perceived risk and the risk indicated by the tool in a sample of healthcare professionals. \nMethods: \nThe WRA was distributed amongst BAME healthcare professionals around Wales, UK with additional questions  to understand participant concordance with the risk stratification from the tool. Statistical analyses were applied to establish the degree of concordance. The initial survey was followed by a more widespread survey across Wales where the sample size of the respondents was 3728 \nResults: \nA total of 136 participants responses were included in the analyses. The majority of participants were below 50 years of age (median age, range), male,  and of BAME ethnicity. The weighted kappa coefficient indicated significant concordance between the tool outcome and respondent’s self perceived risk (k=) . Younger respondents considered themselves at lower risk, which was correctly predicted by the tool. The association between risk tool outcome and self-perceived risk was not affected by participant characteristic. \nOf the larger Welsh cohort of 3728 respondents, 93.8% felt that the tool correctly identified their risk and was in concordance with their own risk perception.      \nConclusions: \nThere was a high level of concordance between the tool user's self-perceived risk and risk assessment tool outcome.  Where there was disagreement, self-perception of risk was lower than that of the tool, indicating a more precautionary approach taken by the tool. The high concordance provides user confidence that the All Wales Covid-19 risk assessment tool is likely to provide a correct risk stratification and mitigation strategies in this occupational group.","PeriodicalId":75015,"journal":{"name":"The Homoeopathic physician","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the All Wales Covid-19 Risk Assessment tool in Practice\",\"authors\":\"Archit Singhal, Alan Abraham, Parag Singhal, D. Raje, K. Singhal\",\"doi\":\"10.38192/1.7.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: \\nThe All-Wales Covid-19 Risk Assessment tool (WRA) was developed to support managers in undertaking individual risk assessments for employees in public facing work settings, and put in place appropriate mitigation. Although a tool for all employees, it’s development was prompted in part by the observation that Covid-19 was disproportionately affecting Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) employees, particularly those in health and social care settings.  This simple, self-administered tool estimates an individual’s risk of severe Covid-19 disease by scoring  personal risk factors, based on those previously identified in the emerging literature. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this tool, by measuring concordance between an individual respondants self perceived risk and the risk indicated by the tool in a sample of healthcare professionals. \\nMethods: \\nThe WRA was distributed amongst BAME healthcare professionals around Wales, UK with additional questions  to understand participant concordance with the risk stratification from the tool. Statistical analyses were applied to establish the degree of concordance. The initial survey was followed by a more widespread survey across Wales where the sample size of the respondents was 3728 \\nResults: \\nA total of 136 participants responses were included in the analyses. The majority of participants were below 50 years of age (median age, range), male,  and of BAME ethnicity. The weighted kappa coefficient indicated significant concordance between the tool outcome and respondent’s self perceived risk (k=) . Younger respondents considered themselves at lower risk, which was correctly predicted by the tool. The association between risk tool outcome and self-perceived risk was not affected by participant characteristic. \\nOf the larger Welsh cohort of 3728 respondents, 93.8% felt that the tool correctly identified their risk and was in concordance with their own risk perception.      \\nConclusions: \\nThere was a high level of concordance between the tool user's self-perceived risk and risk assessment tool outcome.  Where there was disagreement, self-perception of risk was lower than that of the tool, indicating a more precautionary approach taken by the tool. The high concordance provides user confidence that the All Wales Covid-19 risk assessment tool is likely to provide a correct risk stratification and mitigation strategies in this occupational group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Homoeopathic physician\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Homoeopathic physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Homoeopathic physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开发全威尔士Covid-19风险评估工具(WRA)是为了支持管理人员对面向公众的工作环境中的员工进行个人风险评估,并采取适当的缓解措施。虽然这是一个适用于所有员工的工具,但它的开发部分是由于观察到新冠病毒对黑人、亚洲和少数族裔(BAME)员工的影响不成比例,尤其是那些在卫生和社会护理领域工作的员工。这个简单的、自我管理的工具,根据新兴文献中先前发现的个人风险因素,通过评分来估计个人患严重Covid-19疾病的风险。本研究的目的是评估该工具的性能,通过测量单个应答者的自我感知风险和医疗保健专业人员样本中该工具所指示的风险之间的一致性。方法:在英国威尔士的BAME医疗保健专业人员中分发WRA,并附加问题以了解参与者对工具风险分层的一致性。采用统计分析来确定一致性程度。最初的调查之后,在威尔士进行了更广泛的调查,受访者的样本量为3728人。结果:共有136名参与者的回答被纳入分析。大多数参与者年龄在50岁以下(年龄中位数,范围),男性和BAME种族。加权kappa系数表明工具结果与被调查者的自我感知风险之间存在显著的一致性(k=)。年轻的受访者认为自己的风险较低,这是该工具正确预测的。风险工具结果与自我感知风险之间的关联不受参与者特征的影响。在3728名受访者的较大威尔士队列中,93.8%的人认为该工具正确识别了他们的风险,并与他们自己的风险感知一致。结论:工具使用者的自我感知风险与风险评估工具结果之间存在高度的一致性。在存在分歧的情况下,对风险的自我感知低于工具,表明工具采取了更预防性的方法。高度一致性为用户提供了信心,即全威尔士Covid-19风险评估工具可能为该职业群体提供正确的风险分层和缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the All Wales Covid-19 Risk Assessment tool in Practice
Background: The All-Wales Covid-19 Risk Assessment tool (WRA) was developed to support managers in undertaking individual risk assessments for employees in public facing work settings, and put in place appropriate mitigation. Although a tool for all employees, it’s development was prompted in part by the observation that Covid-19 was disproportionately affecting Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) employees, particularly those in health and social care settings.  This simple, self-administered tool estimates an individual’s risk of severe Covid-19 disease by scoring  personal risk factors, based on those previously identified in the emerging literature. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this tool, by measuring concordance between an individual respondants self perceived risk and the risk indicated by the tool in a sample of healthcare professionals. Methods: The WRA was distributed amongst BAME healthcare professionals around Wales, UK with additional questions  to understand participant concordance with the risk stratification from the tool. Statistical analyses were applied to establish the degree of concordance. The initial survey was followed by a more widespread survey across Wales where the sample size of the respondents was 3728 Results: A total of 136 participants responses were included in the analyses. The majority of participants were below 50 years of age (median age, range), male,  and of BAME ethnicity. The weighted kappa coefficient indicated significant concordance between the tool outcome and respondent’s self perceived risk (k=) . Younger respondents considered themselves at lower risk, which was correctly predicted by the tool. The association between risk tool outcome and self-perceived risk was not affected by participant characteristic. Of the larger Welsh cohort of 3728 respondents, 93.8% felt that the tool correctly identified their risk and was in concordance with their own risk perception.      Conclusions: There was a high level of concordance between the tool user's self-perceived risk and risk assessment tool outcome.  Where there was disagreement, self-perception of risk was lower than that of the tool, indicating a more precautionary approach taken by the tool. The high concordance provides user confidence that the All Wales Covid-19 risk assessment tool is likely to provide a correct risk stratification and mitigation strategies in this occupational group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research & Innovation Abstracts The Importance of an Innovation Culture in the NHS A World Without Childhood Blindness Metacognition for Every Clinician Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Prediction for Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1