{"title":"带有2选择规则的偏见意见动态的相变","authors":"Arpan Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1017/s0269964823000098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We consider a model of binary opinion dynamics where one opinion is inherently “superior” than the other, and social agents exhibit a “bias” toward the superior alternative. Specifically, it is assumed that an agent updates its choice to the superior alternative with probability α > 0 irrespective of its current opinion and opinions of other agents. With probability \n \n \n $1-\\alpha$\n \n , it adopts majority opinion among two randomly sampled neighbors and itself. We are interested in the time it takes for the network to converge to a consensus on the superior alternative. In a complete graph of size n, we show that irrespective of the initial configuration of the network, the average time to reach consensus scales as \n \n \n $\\Theta(n\\,\\log n)$\n \n when the bias parameter α is sufficiently high, that is, \n \n \n $\\alpha \\gt \\alpha_c$\n \n where α\n c\n is a threshold parameter that is uniquely characterized. When the bias is low, that is, when \n \n \n $\\alpha \\in (0,\\alpha_c]$\n \n , we show that the same rate of convergence can only be achieved if the initial proportion of agents with the superior opinion is above certain threshold \n \n \n $p_c(\\alpha)$\n \n . If this is not the case, then we show that the network takes \n \n \n $\\Omega(\\exp(\\Theta(n)))$\n \n time on average to reach consensus.","PeriodicalId":54582,"journal":{"name":"Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase transitions in biased opinion dynamics with 2-choices rule\",\"authors\":\"Arpan Mukhopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0269964823000098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We consider a model of binary opinion dynamics where one opinion is inherently “superior” than the other, and social agents exhibit a “bias” toward the superior alternative. Specifically, it is assumed that an agent updates its choice to the superior alternative with probability α > 0 irrespective of its current opinion and opinions of other agents. With probability \\n \\n \\n $1-\\\\alpha$\\n \\n , it adopts majority opinion among two randomly sampled neighbors and itself. We are interested in the time it takes for the network to converge to a consensus on the superior alternative. In a complete graph of size n, we show that irrespective of the initial configuration of the network, the average time to reach consensus scales as \\n \\n \\n $\\\\Theta(n\\\\,\\\\log n)$\\n \\n when the bias parameter α is sufficiently high, that is, \\n \\n \\n $\\\\alpha \\\\gt \\\\alpha_c$\\n \\n where α\\n c\\n is a threshold parameter that is uniquely characterized. When the bias is low, that is, when \\n \\n \\n $\\\\alpha \\\\in (0,\\\\alpha_c]$\\n \\n , we show that the same rate of convergence can only be achieved if the initial proportion of agents with the superior opinion is above certain threshold \\n \\n \\n $p_c(\\\\alpha)$\\n \\n . If this is not the case, then we show that the network takes \\n \\n \\n $\\\\Omega(\\\\exp(\\\\Theta(n)))$\\n \\n time on average to reach consensus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269964823000098\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269964823000098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phase transitions in biased opinion dynamics with 2-choices rule
We consider a model of binary opinion dynamics where one opinion is inherently “superior” than the other, and social agents exhibit a “bias” toward the superior alternative. Specifically, it is assumed that an agent updates its choice to the superior alternative with probability α > 0 irrespective of its current opinion and opinions of other agents. With probability
$1-\alpha$
, it adopts majority opinion among two randomly sampled neighbors and itself. We are interested in the time it takes for the network to converge to a consensus on the superior alternative. In a complete graph of size n, we show that irrespective of the initial configuration of the network, the average time to reach consensus scales as
$\Theta(n\,\log n)$
when the bias parameter α is sufficiently high, that is,
$\alpha \gt \alpha_c$
where α
c
is a threshold parameter that is uniquely characterized. When the bias is low, that is, when
$\alpha \in (0,\alpha_c]$
, we show that the same rate of convergence can only be achieved if the initial proportion of agents with the superior opinion is above certain threshold
$p_c(\alpha)$
. If this is not the case, then we show that the network takes
$\Omega(\exp(\Theta(n)))$
time on average to reach consensus.
期刊介绍:
The primary focus of the journal is on stochastic modelling in the physical and engineering sciences, with particular emphasis on queueing theory, reliability theory, inventory theory, simulation, mathematical finance and probabilistic networks and graphs. Papers on analytic properties and related disciplines are also considered, as well as more general papers on applied and computational probability, if appropriate. Readers include academics working in statistics, operations research, computer science, engineering, management science and physical sciences as well as industrial practitioners engaged in telecommunications, computer science, financial engineering, operations research and management science.