经验教训:应对技能干预试验的结果和方法,比较癌症患者的个人和团体形式

L. Edgar, Z. Rosberger, J. Collet
{"title":"经验教训:应对技能干预试验的结果和方法,比较癌症患者的个人和团体形式","authors":"L. Edgar, Z. Rosberger, J. Collet","doi":"10.2190/U0P3-5VPV-YXKF-GRG1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Nucare, a short-term psychoeducational coping skills training intervention was evaluated in a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 225 newly diagnosed breast and colon cancer patients. Method: Measures of psychosocial distress, well being and optimism were evaluated every four months during a one-year period. Patients were randomized to one of four arms: Nucare presented in an individual basis; Nucare presented in a group format; a non-directive supportive group; and a no-intervention control. The interventions were provided in five sessions of ninety minutes each. Results: Patients with breast cancer who received Nucare presented in an individual format showed more significant improvements in well-being over time compared to those in the control and group arms. Conclusions: We were unable to develop functioning groups within the RCT. Partial explanations for the latter finding include the structural limitations of the RCT: the groups were small, difficult to schedule and patients indicated that they would have preferred to choose whether or not to participate in a group. The positive changes in women with breast cancer who received Nucare persisted at 12 months.","PeriodicalId":22510,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":"81 1","pages":"289 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned: Outcomes and Methodology of a Coping Skills Intervention Trial Comparing Individual and Group Formats for Patients with Cancer\",\"authors\":\"L. Edgar, Z. Rosberger, J. Collet\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/U0P3-5VPV-YXKF-GRG1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Nucare, a short-term psychoeducational coping skills training intervention was evaluated in a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 225 newly diagnosed breast and colon cancer patients. Method: Measures of psychosocial distress, well being and optimism were evaluated every four months during a one-year period. Patients were randomized to one of four arms: Nucare presented in an individual basis; Nucare presented in a group format; a non-directive supportive group; and a no-intervention control. The interventions were provided in five sessions of ninety minutes each. Results: Patients with breast cancer who received Nucare presented in an individual format showed more significant improvements in well-being over time compared to those in the control and group arms. Conclusions: We were unable to develop functioning groups within the RCT. Partial explanations for the latter finding include the structural limitations of the RCT: the groups were small, difficult to schedule and patients indicated that they would have preferred to choose whether or not to participate in a group. The positive changes in women with breast cancer who received Nucare persisted at 12 months.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"289 - 304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/U0P3-5VPV-YXKF-GRG1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/U0P3-5VPV-YXKF-GRG1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

目的:通过随机对照临床试验(RCT)对225例新诊断的乳腺癌和结肠癌患者进行Nucare短期心理教育应对技能训练干预。方法:在一年的时间里,每四个月评估一次心理社会困扰、幸福感和乐观情绪。患者被随机分配到四组中的一组:Nucare以个体为基础;Nucare以组的形式呈现;非指导性支持小组;无干预控制。干预活动分五次进行,每次90分钟。结果:与对照组和组组相比,接受Nucare的乳腺癌患者在个体形式下的幸福感随着时间的推移有了更显著的改善。结论:我们无法在随机对照试验中建立功能组。后一项发现的部分解释包括RCT的结构限制:组很小,难以安排,患者表示他们更愿意选择是否参加一个组。在接受纽卡雷治疗的乳腺癌患者中,这种积极的变化持续了12个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lessons Learned: Outcomes and Methodology of a Coping Skills Intervention Trial Comparing Individual and Group Formats for Patients with Cancer
Objective: Nucare, a short-term psychoeducational coping skills training intervention was evaluated in a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 225 newly diagnosed breast and colon cancer patients. Method: Measures of psychosocial distress, well being and optimism were evaluated every four months during a one-year period. Patients were randomized to one of four arms: Nucare presented in an individual basis; Nucare presented in a group format; a non-directive supportive group; and a no-intervention control. The interventions were provided in five sessions of ninety minutes each. Results: Patients with breast cancer who received Nucare presented in an individual format showed more significant improvements in well-being over time compared to those in the control and group arms. Conclusions: We were unable to develop functioning groups within the RCT. Partial explanations for the latter finding include the structural limitations of the RCT: the groups were small, difficult to schedule and patients indicated that they would have preferred to choose whether or not to participate in a group. The positive changes in women with breast cancer who received Nucare persisted at 12 months.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of AI in the creation of discharge summaries in psychiatric clinics Clinical correlates of medication adherence in individuals with bipolar disorder and comorbid hypertension All medical workers together: For better mental health and primary health care- Posters Duration of untreated psychosis and its associated sociodemographic and clinical factors in first-episode psychosis: A study from Eastern Nepal Depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and suicide in first-degree relatives of patients hospitalised in intensive care units in Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1