系列的介绍

J. Poterba
{"title":"系列的介绍","authors":"J. Poterba","doi":"10.1086/706896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic analysis has much to contribute in many spheres of public policy, but the fields of environmental and energy policy stand out for the centrality of economic issues. With regard to the environment, the relative attractiveness of many leading policy alternatives that emerge in the context of climate change and global warming depends on the social discount rate, an economic construct. Economic analysis is essential for judging the potential costs, and for some areas benefits, that may be associated with rising global temperatures, and for assessing the relativemerits of abatement and amelioration strategies. A crucial economic insight is that when designing policies to reduce any type of environmental degradation, whether air, water, or noise pollution, it is essential to consider the relative costs of emission reduction at different point sources and to search for least-cost strategies to achieve a given emission target. With regard to energy, current tax and regulatory policies play important roles in affecting the utilization of various fossil fuel and renewable energy sources. The rate of economic growth is one of the primary drivers of aggregate energy demand, both within countries and globally. Public spending on energy research and development and intellectual property rules surrounding newdiscoveries are likely to be key determinants of the future viability of alternatives to current energy sources. In recognition of the importance of economics to the study of both environmental and energy policy, and with the generous support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is pleased to launch a new annual initiative—the Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy series—that will encourage leading economic researchers to prepare research papers on current issues in these two fields. The researchers must abide by the NBER’s prohibition on policy recommendations, but they are encouraged to draw","PeriodicalId":87249,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and energy policy and the economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Series Introduction\",\"authors\":\"J. Poterba\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/706896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Economic analysis has much to contribute in many spheres of public policy, but the fields of environmental and energy policy stand out for the centrality of economic issues. With regard to the environment, the relative attractiveness of many leading policy alternatives that emerge in the context of climate change and global warming depends on the social discount rate, an economic construct. Economic analysis is essential for judging the potential costs, and for some areas benefits, that may be associated with rising global temperatures, and for assessing the relativemerits of abatement and amelioration strategies. A crucial economic insight is that when designing policies to reduce any type of environmental degradation, whether air, water, or noise pollution, it is essential to consider the relative costs of emission reduction at different point sources and to search for least-cost strategies to achieve a given emission target. With regard to energy, current tax and regulatory policies play important roles in affecting the utilization of various fossil fuel and renewable energy sources. The rate of economic growth is one of the primary drivers of aggregate energy demand, both within countries and globally. Public spending on energy research and development and intellectual property rules surrounding newdiscoveries are likely to be key determinants of the future viability of alternatives to current energy sources. In recognition of the importance of economics to the study of both environmental and energy policy, and with the generous support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is pleased to launch a new annual initiative—the Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy series—that will encourage leading economic researchers to prepare research papers on current issues in these two fields. The researchers must abide by the NBER’s prohibition on policy recommendations, but they are encouraged to draw\",\"PeriodicalId\":87249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and energy policy and the economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and energy policy and the economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/706896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and energy policy and the economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/706896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济分析在公共政策的许多领域都有很大的贡献,但环境和能源政策领域因经济问题的中心地位而脱颖而出。在环境方面,在气候变化和全球变暖的背景下出现的许多主要政策选择的相对吸引力取决于社会贴现率,这是一种经济结构。经济分析对于判断可能与全球气温上升有关的潜在成本和某些领域的利益,以及评估减少和改善战略的相对优点是必不可少的。一个重要的经济学见解是,在设计减少任何类型的环境退化的政策时,无论是空气、水还是噪音污染,都必须考虑在不同点源上减少排放的相对成本,并寻求实现给定排放目标的最低成本策略。在能源方面,现行的税收和监管政策在影响各种化石燃料和可再生能源的利用方面发挥着重要作用。经济增长率是国家内部和全球总能源需求的主要驱动因素之一。能源研发方面的公共支出,以及围绕新发现的知识产权规则,可能是未来替代现有能源可行性的关键决定因素。认识到经济学对环境和能源政策研究的重要性,并在阿尔弗雷德·p·斯隆基金会的慷慨支持下,美国国家经济研究局(NBER)很高兴推出一项新的年度倡议——环境和能源政策与经济系列——这将鼓励领先的经济研究人员就这两个领域的当前问题准备研究论文。研究人员必须遵守国家经济研究局禁止政策建议的规定,但鼓励他们画画
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Series Introduction
Economic analysis has much to contribute in many spheres of public policy, but the fields of environmental and energy policy stand out for the centrality of economic issues. With regard to the environment, the relative attractiveness of many leading policy alternatives that emerge in the context of climate change and global warming depends on the social discount rate, an economic construct. Economic analysis is essential for judging the potential costs, and for some areas benefits, that may be associated with rising global temperatures, and for assessing the relativemerits of abatement and amelioration strategies. A crucial economic insight is that when designing policies to reduce any type of environmental degradation, whether air, water, or noise pollution, it is essential to consider the relative costs of emission reduction at different point sources and to search for least-cost strategies to achieve a given emission target. With regard to energy, current tax and regulatory policies play important roles in affecting the utilization of various fossil fuel and renewable energy sources. The rate of economic growth is one of the primary drivers of aggregate energy demand, both within countries and globally. Public spending on energy research and development and intellectual property rules surrounding newdiscoveries are likely to be key determinants of the future viability of alternatives to current energy sources. In recognition of the importance of economics to the study of both environmental and energy policy, and with the generous support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is pleased to launch a new annual initiative—the Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy series—that will encourage leading economic researchers to prepare research papers on current issues in these two fields. The researchers must abide by the NBER’s prohibition on policy recommendations, but they are encouraged to draw
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental Justice and the Clean Water Act: Implications for Economic Analyses of Clean Water Regulations Do Red States Have a Comparative Advantage in Generating Green Power? Green Energy Jobs in the United States: What Are They, and Where Are They? Unequal Treatments: Federal Wildfire Fuels Projects and Socioeconomic Status of Nearby Communities Carbon Pricing, Clean Electricity Standards, and Clean Electricity Subsidies on the Path to Zero Emissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1