从世界主义到全球狂欢:苏内塔·佩雷斯·达·科斯塔和米歇尔·德·克雷泽

Coolabah Pub Date : 2017-04-26 DOI:10.1344/CO20182284-94
A. M. Álvarez
{"title":"从世界主义到全球狂欢:苏内塔·佩雷斯·达·科斯塔和米歇尔·德·克雷泽","authors":"A. M. Álvarez","doi":"10.1344/CO20182284-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Veronica Brady, vigorous supporter of Aboriginal causes and deeply concerned with social-injustice issues, underlined that Anglo-Australians were to be excommunicated from the land until they would come to terms with it and its first peoples (in Jones 1997). Nearly twenty years after this statement was postulated, it is my purpose in this paper to look at the land from an Anglo-Australian and non-Indigenous Australian perspective in order to assess if Australian contemporary society has moved beyond what Brady considered a “super ego status” and reconciled to the presence not only of its Indigenous, but also its non-Indigenous others. To do so I will exemplify novels which are part of and influenced by the matrix of relations and social forces in which non-indigenous Australian writers are situated on, including Suneeta Peres da Costa’s Homework (1999) and Michelle de Kretser’s Questions of Travel (2013).","PeriodicalId":10741,"journal":{"name":"Coolabah","volume":"15 1","pages":"84-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Cosmopolitanism to Planetary Conviviality: Suneeta Peres da Costa and Michelle de Kretser\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/CO20182284-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Veronica Brady, vigorous supporter of Aboriginal causes and deeply concerned with social-injustice issues, underlined that Anglo-Australians were to be excommunicated from the land until they would come to terms with it and its first peoples (in Jones 1997). Nearly twenty years after this statement was postulated, it is my purpose in this paper to look at the land from an Anglo-Australian and non-Indigenous Australian perspective in order to assess if Australian contemporary society has moved beyond what Brady considered a “super ego status” and reconciled to the presence not only of its Indigenous, but also its non-Indigenous others. To do so I will exemplify novels which are part of and influenced by the matrix of relations and social forces in which non-indigenous Australian writers are situated on, including Suneeta Peres da Costa’s Homework (1999) and Michelle de Kretser’s Questions of Travel (2013).\",\"PeriodicalId\":10741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coolabah\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"84-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coolabah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/CO20182284-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coolabah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/CO20182284-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维罗妮卡·布雷迪是土著事业的积极支持者,对社会不公正问题深为关注,她强调英裔澳大利亚人应该被驱逐出这片土地,直到他们与这片土地和它的第一批人民达成协议(琼斯1997)。在这句话提出近二十年后,我在本文中的目的是从盎格鲁-澳大利亚人和非土著澳大利亚人的角度来看待这片土地,以评估澳大利亚当代社会是否已经超越了布雷迪所认为的“超自我地位”,并且不仅与土著居民的存在和解,而且与其他非土著居民的存在和解。为了做到这一点,我将举例说明那些属于非土著澳大利亚作家所处的关系和社会力量矩阵的一部分并受其影响的小说,包括苏内塔·佩雷斯·达·科斯塔的《家庭作业》(1999)和米歇尔·德·克雷泽的《旅行问题》(2013)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Cosmopolitanism to Planetary Conviviality: Suneeta Peres da Costa and Michelle de Kretser
Veronica Brady, vigorous supporter of Aboriginal causes and deeply concerned with social-injustice issues, underlined that Anglo-Australians were to be excommunicated from the land until they would come to terms with it and its first peoples (in Jones 1997). Nearly twenty years after this statement was postulated, it is my purpose in this paper to look at the land from an Anglo-Australian and non-Indigenous Australian perspective in order to assess if Australian contemporary society has moved beyond what Brady considered a “super ego status” and reconciled to the presence not only of its Indigenous, but also its non-Indigenous others. To do so I will exemplify novels which are part of and influenced by the matrix of relations and social forces in which non-indigenous Australian writers are situated on, including Suneeta Peres da Costa’s Homework (1999) and Michelle de Kretser’s Questions of Travel (2013).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Clouds Apparitions and Atmospheres Effects of Atmosphere in Andrew McGahan’s “The Rich Man’s House” Nessie and Noctilucent Clouds My Mother’s Ghosts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1