内镜下括约肌切开术中扁平乳头和出血:内镜后胰腺炎的两个新的危险因素

A. Jamry
{"title":"内镜下括约肌切开术中扁平乳头和出血:内镜后胰腺炎的两个新的危险因素","authors":"A. Jamry","doi":"10.26420/AUSTINJSURG.2021.1259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the risk factors for post-endoscopic pancreatitis (PEP). Background: PEP occurs in 4%-42% of patients, depending on their risk factors. Over 56 risk factors were analyzed, but only 4were found to be repeated in most studies. Study: A single-center retrospective study analyzing 402 consecutive patients with naïve papillae who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was conducted. The significance of 14 potentially new risk factors was evaluated, and it was found that they were associated with the level of bile duct stenosis, papilla anatomy, bleeding during sphincterotomy, endoscopic bleeding control, and pathological examination. Furthermore, 13 of the most frequently published risk factors were re-analyzed. Results: Five risk factors (containing two new ones) were significant with the following univariate and multivariate regression values: flat papilla (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, p=0.0049; OR 4.59, p=0.0244) and bleeding during endoscopic sphincterotomy (OR 3.58, p=0.148; OR 4.07, p=0.0257), and significance of the three already known risk factors was confirmed: age <40 years (OR 6.89, p=0.0139; OR 4.96, p=0.0139), common bile duct (CBD) diameter < 9 mm (OR 5.35, p=0.0007; OR 3.98, p=0.0203), and difficulty in cannulation (OR 3.2, p=0.0298; OR 7.72, p=0.004). Conclusion: This study reaffirms the risk of PEP associated with age, difficulty in cannulation, and CBD diameter. It also identifies two new risk factors: flat papilla and bleeding during sphincterotomy. These results suggest the need for a change in ERCP methodology in patients with these risk factors, but this finding requires confirmation in subsequent studies.","PeriodicalId":91056,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of surgery","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flat Papilla of Vater and Bleeding during Endoscopic Sphincterotomy: Two New Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Pancreatitis\",\"authors\":\"A. Jamry\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/AUSTINJSURG.2021.1259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To analyze the risk factors for post-endoscopic pancreatitis (PEP). Background: PEP occurs in 4%-42% of patients, depending on their risk factors. Over 56 risk factors were analyzed, but only 4were found to be repeated in most studies. Study: A single-center retrospective study analyzing 402 consecutive patients with naïve papillae who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was conducted. The significance of 14 potentially new risk factors was evaluated, and it was found that they were associated with the level of bile duct stenosis, papilla anatomy, bleeding during sphincterotomy, endoscopic bleeding control, and pathological examination. Furthermore, 13 of the most frequently published risk factors were re-analyzed. Results: Five risk factors (containing two new ones) were significant with the following univariate and multivariate regression values: flat papilla (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, p=0.0049; OR 4.59, p=0.0244) and bleeding during endoscopic sphincterotomy (OR 3.58, p=0.148; OR 4.07, p=0.0257), and significance of the three already known risk factors was confirmed: age <40 years (OR 6.89, p=0.0139; OR 4.96, p=0.0139), common bile duct (CBD) diameter < 9 mm (OR 5.35, p=0.0007; OR 3.98, p=0.0203), and difficulty in cannulation (OR 3.2, p=0.0298; OR 7.72, p=0.004). Conclusion: This study reaffirms the risk of PEP associated with age, difficulty in cannulation, and CBD diameter. It also identifies two new risk factors: flat papilla and bleeding during sphincterotomy. These results suggest the need for a change in ERCP methodology in patients with these risk factors, but this finding requires confirmation in subsequent studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJSURG.2021.1259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJSURG.2021.1259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析内镜后胰腺炎(PEP)的危险因素。背景:PEP发生率为4%-42%,取决于患者的危险因素。超过56个危险因素被分析,但只有4个在大多数研究中被重复发现。研究:进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,分析了402例连续接受内窥镜逆行胆管胰胆管造影(ERCP)的naïve乳头状瘤患者。对14个潜在的新危险因素进行意义评价,发现它们与胆管狭窄程度、乳头解剖、括约肌切开术出血、内镜下出血控制、病理检查等相关。此外,重新分析了13个最常发表的风险因素。结果:5个危险因素(含2个新危险因素)具有显著性,单因素和多因素回归值如下:扁平乳头(优势比[OR] 5.1, p=0.0049;OR 4.59, p=0.0244)和内窥镜括约肌切开术出血(OR 3.58, p=0.148;OR 4.07, p=0.0257),三个已知危险因素的显著性得到证实:年龄<40岁(OR 6.89, p=0.0139;OR 4.96, p=0.0139),胆总管(CBD)直径< 9 mm (OR 5.35, p=0.0007;OR 3.98, p=0.0203),插管困难(OR 3.2, p=0.0298;OR 7.72, p=0.004)。结论:本研究重申PEP风险与年龄、插管难度和CBD直径相关。它还确定了两个新的危险因素:扁平乳头和括约肌切开术中的出血。这些结果提示有必要改变具有这些危险因素的患者的ERCP方法,但这一发现需要在后续研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flat Papilla of Vater and Bleeding during Endoscopic Sphincterotomy: Two New Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Pancreatitis
Objective: To analyze the risk factors for post-endoscopic pancreatitis (PEP). Background: PEP occurs in 4%-42% of patients, depending on their risk factors. Over 56 risk factors were analyzed, but only 4were found to be repeated in most studies. Study: A single-center retrospective study analyzing 402 consecutive patients with naïve papillae who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was conducted. The significance of 14 potentially new risk factors was evaluated, and it was found that they were associated with the level of bile duct stenosis, papilla anatomy, bleeding during sphincterotomy, endoscopic bleeding control, and pathological examination. Furthermore, 13 of the most frequently published risk factors were re-analyzed. Results: Five risk factors (containing two new ones) were significant with the following univariate and multivariate regression values: flat papilla (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, p=0.0049; OR 4.59, p=0.0244) and bleeding during endoscopic sphincterotomy (OR 3.58, p=0.148; OR 4.07, p=0.0257), and significance of the three already known risk factors was confirmed: age <40 years (OR 6.89, p=0.0139; OR 4.96, p=0.0139), common bile duct (CBD) diameter < 9 mm (OR 5.35, p=0.0007; OR 3.98, p=0.0203), and difficulty in cannulation (OR 3.2, p=0.0298; OR 7.72, p=0.004). Conclusion: This study reaffirms the risk of PEP associated with age, difficulty in cannulation, and CBD diameter. It also identifies two new risk factors: flat papilla and bleeding during sphincterotomy. These results suggest the need for a change in ERCP methodology in patients with these risk factors, but this finding requires confirmation in subsequent studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Topic - Controlled Drug Release by Excipient Modification: A Review Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Peritoneum: An Unusual Location of A Rare Tumor A Case of Retroperitoneal Panniculitis with Paralytic Ileus Mimiking a High Intestinal Obstruction Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas with Node Invasion: What to do? A Case Report and Literature Review Management of an Uncommun Giant Ovarian Hydatid Cyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1