目前多参数mri在前列腺癌诊断中的作用:文献综述

K. Karakoishin, Z. Zholdybay, A. Aynakulova, D. Toleshbaev, Z. Amankulov, Zh. Zhakenova, A. Beisen, A. Kabidenov, N. Kashaev
{"title":"目前多参数mri在前列腺癌诊断中的作用:文献综述","authors":"K. Karakoishin, Z. Zholdybay, A. Aynakulova, D. Toleshbaev, Z. Amankulov, Zh. Zhakenova, A. Beisen, A. Kabidenov, N. Kashaev","doi":"10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-66-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is one of the main methods for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). Although mpMRI has been adopted into routine urological and oncological practice in a few short years, there are conflicting views on the timing of mpMRI. \nThe purpose was to study the diagnostic value and role of mpMRI at the stages of diagnosis of prostate cancer. \nMethods: The article reviews the literature on the use of mpMRI in diagnosing prostate cancer in the framework of traditional clinical approaches. \nResults: current national guidelines in Europe emphasize the value of mpMRI in diagnosing patients with suspected PCa. The rationale for \nusing mpMRI in selecting patients with suspected PCa who should and should not be biopsied and selecting areas of the prostate for biopsy is \ncompelling. The evidence base, including level 1 studies, is overwhelming, as are arguments for patient benefit in avoiding biopsy or overdiagnosis \nof clinically insignificant cancer. \nConclusion: Patients considering biopsy start to realize that mpMRI imaging can avoid biopsy in some cases and make it more targeted in \nothers. For obvious reasons, these patients will seek to avoid the risk of biopsy or minimize the risk with fewer biopsy specimens. Switching from \n“standard” SB to TB judiciously and selectively augmented with BD using a two-stage risk assessment offers the best compromise to reduce biopsy \nrates and reduce overdiagnosis of cnPCa while minimizing the chances of missing clinically significant cancer. Evidence that it is possible to avoid \nSB altogether, even in the era of mpMRI before biopsy, is weak. This provides grounds for searching for new methods for diagnosing clinically \nsignificant cancer using mpMRI","PeriodicalId":19480,"journal":{"name":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CURRENT ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER: \\nA LITERATURE REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"K. Karakoishin, Z. Zholdybay, A. Aynakulova, D. Toleshbaev, Z. Amankulov, Zh. Zhakenova, A. Beisen, A. Kabidenov, N. Kashaev\",\"doi\":\"10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-66-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is one of the main methods for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). Although mpMRI has been adopted into routine urological and oncological practice in a few short years, there are conflicting views on the timing of mpMRI. \\nThe purpose was to study the diagnostic value and role of mpMRI at the stages of diagnosis of prostate cancer. \\nMethods: The article reviews the literature on the use of mpMRI in diagnosing prostate cancer in the framework of traditional clinical approaches. \\nResults: current national guidelines in Europe emphasize the value of mpMRI in diagnosing patients with suspected PCa. The rationale for \\nusing mpMRI in selecting patients with suspected PCa who should and should not be biopsied and selecting areas of the prostate for biopsy is \\ncompelling. The evidence base, including level 1 studies, is overwhelming, as are arguments for patient benefit in avoiding biopsy or overdiagnosis \\nof clinically insignificant cancer. \\nConclusion: Patients considering biopsy start to realize that mpMRI imaging can avoid biopsy in some cases and make it more targeted in \\nothers. For obvious reasons, these patients will seek to avoid the risk of biopsy or minimize the risk with fewer biopsy specimens. Switching from \\n“standard” SB to TB judiciously and selectively augmented with BD using a two-stage risk assessment offers the best compromise to reduce biopsy \\nrates and reduce overdiagnosis of cnPCa while minimizing the chances of missing clinically significant cancer. Evidence that it is possible to avoid \\nSB altogether, even in the era of mpMRI before biopsy, is weak. This provides grounds for searching for new methods for diagnosing clinically \\nsignificant cancer using mpMRI\",\"PeriodicalId\":19480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-66-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-66-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相关性:多参数MRI (mpMRI)是诊断前列腺癌(PCa)的主要方法之一。尽管在短短几年内mpMRI已被应用于泌尿外科和肿瘤学的常规实践中,但关于mpMRI的时机存在相互矛盾的观点。目的探讨mpMRI在前列腺癌分期诊断中的价值和作用。方法:在传统临床方法的框架下,对mpMRI在前列腺癌诊断中的应用文献进行综述。结果:欧洲目前的国家指南强调mpMRI在诊断疑似PCa患者中的价值。使用mpMRI来选择应该或不应该进行活检的疑似前列腺癌患者以及选择前列腺活检区域的理由是令人信服的。包括一级研究在内的证据基础是压倒性的,避免对临床无关紧要的癌症进行活检或过度诊断对患者有益的论点也是如此。结论:考虑活检的患者开始意识到,mpMRI成像在某些情况下可以避免活检,而在另一些情况下则更有针对性。由于显而易见的原因,这些患者会寻求避免活检的风险或减少活检标本的风险。使用两阶段风险评估,明智地将“标准”SB转换为TB,并有选择地增加BD,这是降低活检率和减少cnPCa过度诊断的最佳折衷方案,同时最大限度地减少遗漏临床重要癌症的机会。即使在活检前进行mpMRI的时代,完全可以避免SB的证据也很薄弱。这为探索利用mpMRI诊断临床重要癌症的新方法提供了依据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE CURRENT ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Relevance: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is one of the main methods for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). Although mpMRI has been adopted into routine urological and oncological practice in a few short years, there are conflicting views on the timing of mpMRI. The purpose was to study the diagnostic value and role of mpMRI at the stages of diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods: The article reviews the literature on the use of mpMRI in diagnosing prostate cancer in the framework of traditional clinical approaches. Results: current national guidelines in Europe emphasize the value of mpMRI in diagnosing patients with suspected PCa. The rationale for using mpMRI in selecting patients with suspected PCa who should and should not be biopsied and selecting areas of the prostate for biopsy is compelling. The evidence base, including level 1 studies, is overwhelming, as are arguments for patient benefit in avoiding biopsy or overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. Conclusion: Patients considering biopsy start to realize that mpMRI imaging can avoid biopsy in some cases and make it more targeted in others. For obvious reasons, these patients will seek to avoid the risk of biopsy or minimize the risk with fewer biopsy specimens. Switching from “standard” SB to TB judiciously and selectively augmented with BD using a two-stage risk assessment offers the best compromise to reduce biopsy rates and reduce overdiagnosis of cnPCa while minimizing the chances of missing clinically significant cancer. Evidence that it is possible to avoid SB altogether, even in the era of mpMRI before biopsy, is weak. This provides grounds for searching for new methods for diagnosing clinically significant cancer using mpMRI
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SITUATION OF SKIN CANCER AND MELANOMIA IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN IN 2012-2022 DNA BREAKS AND REPAIR IN LYMPHOCYTES AS A DIAGNOSTIC MARKER IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC CANCER MODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS FOR COLORECTAL CANCER DEVELOPMENT: A LITERATURE REVIEW CARCINOGENICITY OF IONIZING RADIATION: A LITERATURE REVIEW THE RESULTS OF THE JAPANESE GASTRIC CANCER SOCIETY MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION ADAPTATION FOR THE KAZAKH POPULATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1