肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗效果

Jakub Ohla, D. Mątewski, Marek Jedwabiński
{"title":"肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗效果","authors":"Jakub Ohla, D. Mątewski, Marek Jedwabiński","doi":"10.12775/MBS.2015.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glenohumeral joint movement dysfunction, often caused by proximal humeral fracture, limits daily activity. Proximal fracture of the humerus is a common injury which constitutes 5.7% of all fractures in trauma patients. The aim of the study was the retrospective evaluation of results of surgical treatment of proximal humeral fracture in accordance to fracture type and applied treatment. The study group consisted of 70 patients who had undergone surgery due to proximal humeral fracture. The mean age in the study group was 55.2 years. The patients were classified according to the AO/ASIF system, based on the preoperative X-ray in comparison to the operative X-ray image. The patients were treated with five methods (ORIF – LCP-type plate, ORIF – AO-type plate, ORIF – AO screw(s), CRIF – intramedullary nailing, CRIF – „K” wires). The average time of follow-up amounted to 19.4 months. The function of the glenohumeral joint was assessed after surgery applying the Constant-Murley scale. The analysis of treatment outcomes showed that in patients operated on for proximal humeral fracture type A and B, the percentage of results described as very good and good was comparable and amounted to approximately 50%. In the smallest group of patients with the most complex type C fractures, a good and very good result was observed only in 14.29% of the subjects. The analysis did not show statistically significant differences in treatment results (p>0.05). Multiple comparisons showed that regardless of the fracture type, patients received a similar score on the Constant-Murley scale. Osteosynthesis using LCP plates and angular stabile screws does not improve the treatment outcome in any type of the proximal humeral fracture. However, LCP plates and angular stable screws are used as a standard management for the most severe cases of proximal humeral fracture. Because of a many available treatment techniques, qualification for a particular treatment method should be considered individually for every patient.","PeriodicalId":18339,"journal":{"name":"Medical and Biological Sciences","volume":"323 1","pages":"35-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of surgical treatment of proximal humerał fracture\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Ohla, D. Mątewski, Marek Jedwabiński\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/MBS.2015.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Glenohumeral joint movement dysfunction, often caused by proximal humeral fracture, limits daily activity. Proximal fracture of the humerus is a common injury which constitutes 5.7% of all fractures in trauma patients. The aim of the study was the retrospective evaluation of results of surgical treatment of proximal humeral fracture in accordance to fracture type and applied treatment. The study group consisted of 70 patients who had undergone surgery due to proximal humeral fracture. The mean age in the study group was 55.2 years. The patients were classified according to the AO/ASIF system, based on the preoperative X-ray in comparison to the operative X-ray image. The patients were treated with five methods (ORIF – LCP-type plate, ORIF – AO-type plate, ORIF – AO screw(s), CRIF – intramedullary nailing, CRIF – „K” wires). The average time of follow-up amounted to 19.4 months. The function of the glenohumeral joint was assessed after surgery applying the Constant-Murley scale. The analysis of treatment outcomes showed that in patients operated on for proximal humeral fracture type A and B, the percentage of results described as very good and good was comparable and amounted to approximately 50%. In the smallest group of patients with the most complex type C fractures, a good and very good result was observed only in 14.29% of the subjects. The analysis did not show statistically significant differences in treatment results (p>0.05). Multiple comparisons showed that regardless of the fracture type, patients received a similar score on the Constant-Murley scale. Osteosynthesis using LCP plates and angular stabile screws does not improve the treatment outcome in any type of the proximal humeral fracture. However, LCP plates and angular stable screws are used as a standard management for the most severe cases of proximal humeral fracture. Because of a many available treatment techniques, qualification for a particular treatment method should be considered individually for every patient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical and Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"323 1\",\"pages\":\"35-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical and Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/MBS.2015.035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/MBS.2015.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肱骨盂关节运动功能障碍通常由肱骨近端骨折引起,限制了日常活动。肱骨近端骨折是一种常见的损伤,占创伤患者骨折的5.7%。本研究的目的是根据骨折类型和应用治疗方法对肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗结果进行回顾性评价。研究组由70例因肱骨近端骨折而接受手术的患者组成。研究组的平均年龄为55.2岁。根据术前x线片与术中x线片的对比,根据AO/ASIF系统对患者进行分类。采用ORIF - lcp型钢板、ORIF - AO型钢板、ORIF - AO螺钉、CRIF -髓内钉、CRIF -“K”型丝钉5种方法治疗。平均随访时间19.4个月。术后应用Constant-Murley评分法评估盂肱关节功能。治疗结果分析显示,在A型和B型肱骨近端骨折手术的患者中,非常好和良好的结果百分比相当,约为50%。在最复杂的C型骨折的最小组患者中,只有14.29%的受试者观察到良好和非常好的结果。两组治疗结果差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。多重比较表明,无论骨折类型如何,患者在Constant-Murley量表上的得分相似。在任何类型的肱骨近端骨折中,使用LCP钢板和角稳定螺钉进行植骨并不能改善治疗效果。然而,LCP钢板和角度稳定螺钉是肱骨近端骨折最严重病例的标准治疗方法。由于有许多可用的治疗技术,应针对每个患者单独考虑特定治疗方法的资格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome of surgical treatment of proximal humerał fracture
Glenohumeral joint movement dysfunction, often caused by proximal humeral fracture, limits daily activity. Proximal fracture of the humerus is a common injury which constitutes 5.7% of all fractures in trauma patients. The aim of the study was the retrospective evaluation of results of surgical treatment of proximal humeral fracture in accordance to fracture type and applied treatment. The study group consisted of 70 patients who had undergone surgery due to proximal humeral fracture. The mean age in the study group was 55.2 years. The patients were classified according to the AO/ASIF system, based on the preoperative X-ray in comparison to the operative X-ray image. The patients were treated with five methods (ORIF – LCP-type plate, ORIF – AO-type plate, ORIF – AO screw(s), CRIF – intramedullary nailing, CRIF – „K” wires). The average time of follow-up amounted to 19.4 months. The function of the glenohumeral joint was assessed after surgery applying the Constant-Murley scale. The analysis of treatment outcomes showed that in patients operated on for proximal humeral fracture type A and B, the percentage of results described as very good and good was comparable and amounted to approximately 50%. In the smallest group of patients with the most complex type C fractures, a good and very good result was observed only in 14.29% of the subjects. The analysis did not show statistically significant differences in treatment results (p>0.05). Multiple comparisons showed that regardless of the fracture type, patients received a similar score on the Constant-Murley scale. Osteosynthesis using LCP plates and angular stabile screws does not improve the treatment outcome in any type of the proximal humeral fracture. However, LCP plates and angular stable screws are used as a standard management for the most severe cases of proximal humeral fracture. Because of a many available treatment techniques, qualification for a particular treatment method should be considered individually for every patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic hypothermia after a cardiac arrest – Benefits, limitations, controversy The epidemiology of breast cancer in Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodship in 2006-2010 Review of research tools for assessment of performance of nursing staff Role of mobility in cognitive development of children with motor deficyt – own observations of wheelchairs users Realization of the principles of rational nutrition by the universities of Bydgoszcz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1