Aryane Karoline Vital de Souza, Jessica Caroliny de Jesus Neves, Jéssica Cristina Leite, L. Vitor, D. Fujisawa
{"title":"双肩书包重量对儿童体位控制的影响分析","authors":"Aryane Karoline Vital de Souza, Jessica Caroliny de Jesus Neves, Jéssica Cristina Leite, L. Vitor, D. Fujisawa","doi":"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I0.39242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the influence of the weight of school backpacks on postural control of children. Cross-sectional study in healthy children aged eight years old. The postural control was evaluated on the force plate (FP) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in three distinct conditions: without backpack (WB), and the backpack adjusted with 5% (.5) and 10% (. 10) of body mass. 90 children were evaluated, and 80% of them used backpacks with two shoulder straps, and 16% of the children carried over 10% of their body mass in the backpacks. Regarding the postural control with load on school backpack, there was increase in the sway area of the center of pressure (A-COP.WB = 6.92 cm²; A-COP.5 = 8.39 cm²; A-COP.10 = 7.96 cm²) and time, in seconds, the performance of the TUG (TUG.WB = 4.75 s; TUG.5 = 4.99 s; TUG.10 = 5.06 s), with statistically significant difference between the loads (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0005), respectively. The anteroposterior (VELAP.SM = 2.41cm s-1; VELAP.5 = 2.30 cm s-1; VELAP.10 = 2.22 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) and mediolateral velocity (VELML.WB = 2.38 cm s-1; VELML.5 = 2.28 cm s-1; VELML.10 = 2.20 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) had a decrease in the median values with statistically significant difference in different conditions. School backpack load increased the COP area, the time of the TUG and modified the response mechanisms. Therefore, loads up to 5% of body mass imposed on school backpack have negatively influenced the postural control.","PeriodicalId":7185,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","volume":"55 5 1","pages":"39242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the weight of school backpack with double strapson the postural control of children\",\"authors\":\"Aryane Karoline Vital de Souza, Jessica Caroliny de Jesus Neves, Jéssica Cristina Leite, L. Vitor, D. Fujisawa\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I0.39242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To investigate the influence of the weight of school backpacks on postural control of children. Cross-sectional study in healthy children aged eight years old. The postural control was evaluated on the force plate (FP) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in three distinct conditions: without backpack (WB), and the backpack adjusted with 5% (.5) and 10% (. 10) of body mass. 90 children were evaluated, and 80% of them used backpacks with two shoulder straps, and 16% of the children carried over 10% of their body mass in the backpacks. Regarding the postural control with load on school backpack, there was increase in the sway area of the center of pressure (A-COP.WB = 6.92 cm²; A-COP.5 = 8.39 cm²; A-COP.10 = 7.96 cm²) and time, in seconds, the performance of the TUG (TUG.WB = 4.75 s; TUG.5 = 4.99 s; TUG.10 = 5.06 s), with statistically significant difference between the loads (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0005), respectively. The anteroposterior (VELAP.SM = 2.41cm s-1; VELAP.5 = 2.30 cm s-1; VELAP.10 = 2.22 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) and mediolateral velocity (VELML.WB = 2.38 cm s-1; VELML.5 = 2.28 cm s-1; VELML.10 = 2.20 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) had a decrease in the median values with statistically significant difference in different conditions. School backpack load increased the COP area, the time of the TUG and modified the response mechanisms. Therefore, loads up to 5% of body mass imposed on school backpack have negatively influenced the postural control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science\",\"volume\":\"55 5 1\",\"pages\":\"39242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I0.39242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I0.39242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨书包重量对儿童体位控制的影响。八岁健康儿童横断面研究。在三种不同的情况下:不带背包(WB),背包以5%(0.5)和10%(0.5)的幅度调整,通过力板(FP)和定时上走测试(TUG)来评估姿势控制。10)体重。对90名儿童进行了评估,其中80%的儿童使用双肩带背包,16%的儿童在背包中携带的重量超过其体重的10%。在负重姿势控制方面,压力中心摆动面积(A-COP)有所增加。WB = 6.92 cm²;一个警察。5 = 8.39 cm²;一个警察。10 = 7.96 cm²)和时间,以秒为单位,拖船(TUG.)的性能。WB = 4.75 s;TUG.5 = 4.99 s;TUG.10 = 5.06 s),负荷间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0001;P = 0.0005)。前后侧(VELAP)。SM = 2.41cm s-1;VELAP.5 = 2.30 cm s-1;VELAP.10 = 2.22 cm s-1;p = 0.0001)和中外侧速度(VELML)。WB = 2.38 cm s-1;VELML.5 = 2.28 cm s-1;VELML.10 = 2.20 cm s-1;P = 0.0001)中位值下降,不同条件下差异有统计学意义。学校背包载荷增加了COP面积、拖曳时间,改变了响应机制。因此,在学校背包上施加高达体重5%的负荷会对姿势控制产生负面影响。
Analysis of the weight of school backpack with double strapson the postural control of children
To investigate the influence of the weight of school backpacks on postural control of children. Cross-sectional study in healthy children aged eight years old. The postural control was evaluated on the force plate (FP) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in three distinct conditions: without backpack (WB), and the backpack adjusted with 5% (.5) and 10% (. 10) of body mass. 90 children were evaluated, and 80% of them used backpacks with two shoulder straps, and 16% of the children carried over 10% of their body mass in the backpacks. Regarding the postural control with load on school backpack, there was increase in the sway area of the center of pressure (A-COP.WB = 6.92 cm²; A-COP.5 = 8.39 cm²; A-COP.10 = 7.96 cm²) and time, in seconds, the performance of the TUG (TUG.WB = 4.75 s; TUG.5 = 4.99 s; TUG.10 = 5.06 s), with statistically significant difference between the loads (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0005), respectively. The anteroposterior (VELAP.SM = 2.41cm s-1; VELAP.5 = 2.30 cm s-1; VELAP.10 = 2.22 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) and mediolateral velocity (VELML.WB = 2.38 cm s-1; VELML.5 = 2.28 cm s-1; VELML.10 = 2.20 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) had a decrease in the median values with statistically significant difference in different conditions. School backpack load increased the COP area, the time of the TUG and modified the response mechanisms. Therefore, loads up to 5% of body mass imposed on school backpack have negatively influenced the postural control.