祝贺2022年约翰·巴雷特奖的获奖者

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q3 AREA STUDIES Journal of Australian Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/14443058.2023.2237284
A. Johnston
{"title":"祝贺2022年约翰·巴雷特奖的获奖者","authors":"A. Johnston","doi":"10.1080/14443058.2023.2237284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Situating the white masculinist archetype of the ocker and women ’ s liberation within the same historical frame, Michelle Arrow o ff ers a compelling argument about the fi lmic ocker fi gure as a form of contestation against the Australian women ’ s liberation movement in the 1970s. The ocker fi gure is linked to other “ egalitarian ” Australian character types such as the larrikin and the bushman, which originated in the racialised crucible of white 19th-century labour. Yet while the ocker is understood as a manifestation of state-sanctioned 1970s “ new nationalism ” , Arrow moves beyond questions of national identity to make a signi fi cant contribution to ongoing debates about the history of Australian gender relations. More speci fi cally, she argues that new nationalist popular culture was a key site of gendered cultural contest during a time of radical feminist challenge to Australian cultural, social, and political norms. If the afterlife of the (toned-down) ocker suggests that “ ockerdom ” emerged victorious in the 1980s as a way of representing Australia to the world, Arrow convincingly recuperates the 1970s as a transformative decade of feminist challenge in Australia, noting the resurgence of touchstones of popular 1970s feminism today.","PeriodicalId":51817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Congratulations to the 2022 Winners of the John Barrett Award\",\"authors\":\"A. Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14443058.2023.2237284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Situating the white masculinist archetype of the ocker and women ’ s liberation within the same historical frame, Michelle Arrow o ff ers a compelling argument about the fi lmic ocker fi gure as a form of contestation against the Australian women ’ s liberation movement in the 1970s. The ocker fi gure is linked to other “ egalitarian ” Australian character types such as the larrikin and the bushman, which originated in the racialised crucible of white 19th-century labour. Yet while the ocker is understood as a manifestation of state-sanctioned 1970s “ new nationalism ” , Arrow moves beyond questions of national identity to make a signi fi cant contribution to ongoing debates about the history of Australian gender relations. More speci fi cally, she argues that new nationalist popular culture was a key site of gendered cultural contest during a time of radical feminist challenge to Australian cultural, social, and political norms. If the afterlife of the (toned-down) ocker suggests that “ ockerdom ” emerged victorious in the 1980s as a way of representing Australia to the world, Arrow convincingly recuperates the 1970s as a transformative decade of feminist challenge in Australia, noting the resurgence of touchstones of popular 1970s feminism today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Australian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Australian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2023.2237284\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2023.2237284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

米歇尔·阿罗将白人男性主义的奥克尔原型和妇女解放置于同一历史框架中,提出了一个令人信服的论点,即电影中的奥克尔形象是对20世纪70年代澳大利亚妇女解放运动的一种对抗。ocker人物形象与其他“平等主义”的澳大利亚人物类型有关,如larrikin和bushman,它们起源于19世纪白人劳工的种族化熔炉。然而,虽然这本书被理解为20世纪70年代国家认可的“新民族主义”的表现,但阿罗超越了民族认同的问题,对正在进行的关于澳大利亚两性关系历史的辩论做出了重大贡献。更具体地说,她认为,在激进女权主义挑战澳大利亚文化、社会和政治规范的时期,新的民族主义流行文化是性别文化竞争的关键场所。如果说(低调的)ocker的死后表明,“ockerdom”在20世纪80年代取得了胜利,成为向世界展示澳大利亚的一种方式,那么Arrow则令人信服地将20世纪70年代恢复为澳大利亚女权主义挑战的变革十年,并指出了20世纪70年代流行女权主义的试金石在今天的复兴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Congratulations to the 2022 Winners of the John Barrett Award
Situating the white masculinist archetype of the ocker and women ’ s liberation within the same historical frame, Michelle Arrow o ff ers a compelling argument about the fi lmic ocker fi gure as a form of contestation against the Australian women ’ s liberation movement in the 1970s. The ocker fi gure is linked to other “ egalitarian ” Australian character types such as the larrikin and the bushman, which originated in the racialised crucible of white 19th-century labour. Yet while the ocker is understood as a manifestation of state-sanctioned 1970s “ new nationalism ” , Arrow moves beyond questions of national identity to make a signi fi cant contribution to ongoing debates about the history of Australian gender relations. More speci fi cally, she argues that new nationalist popular culture was a key site of gendered cultural contest during a time of radical feminist challenge to Australian cultural, social, and political norms. If the afterlife of the (toned-down) ocker suggests that “ ockerdom ” emerged victorious in the 1980s as a way of representing Australia to the world, Arrow convincingly recuperates the 1970s as a transformative decade of feminist challenge in Australia, noting the resurgence of touchstones of popular 1970s feminism today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Australian Studies (JAS) is the journal of the International Australian Studies Association (InASA). In print since the mid-1970s, in the last few decades JAS has been involved in some of the most important discussion about the past, present and future of Australia. The Journal of Australian Studies is a fully refereed, international quarterly journal which publishes scholarly articles and reviews on Australian culture, society, politics, history and literature. The editorial practice is to promote and include multi- and interdisciplinary work.
期刊最新文献
Congratulations to the 2023 Winners of the John Barrett Award Practices of Belonging through the Past and the Present “Who Needs a Marvel Superhero When You’ve Got Molly Johnson?”: Country and Maternal Agency in Leah Purcell’s Adaptations of “The Drover’s Wife” The Myth of Heterosexuality: Queer Australian Artists, Art Historians and Gallerists in London, 1930–1961 Misapprehensions of a Caustic Eye: A. D. Hope and the Failure of Angry Penguins as a Modernist Literary Movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1