评估触觉人机交互距离

M. Lieser, Ulrich Schwanecke, J. Berdux
{"title":"评估触觉人机交互距离","authors":"M. Lieser, Ulrich Schwanecke, J. Berdux","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing autonomy and presence of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), especially quadrotors, in everyday applications requires in-depth studies of proxemics in Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) and novel methods of user interaction suitable for different distances. This paper presents a user study (N=32) that evaluates proxemics with a miniature quadrotor (92 mm wheelbase) from four directions (front, back, left, right) in a seated setting investigating preferred approach directions and distances in future home or workplace scenarios. The goal of this study is to determine if humans are willing to allow flying robots of that size and mechanical appearance to approach close enough to enable tactile interaction. Moreover, the participants' inclination to physically interact with the quadrotor is examined. Studies evaluating proxemics in HDI are highly dependent on repeatable results and actually flying robots. In most comparable studies, the quadrotors used did not fly freely or at all, but were moved, manually controlled, or flew barely repeatable trajectories due to unstable onboard navigation. Only few studies have used pose estimation systems that ensure smooth and reproducible trajectories and thus reliable findings of the studies. For this reason, in addition to the presented study and its results, an insight into the used testbed is provided, that also integrates full skeleton pose estimation rather than tracking participants with only a single marker.","PeriodicalId":6854,"journal":{"name":"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"104 1","pages":"1275-1282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Distances in Tactile Human-Drone Interaction\",\"authors\":\"M. Lieser, Ulrich Schwanecke, J. Berdux\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing autonomy and presence of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), especially quadrotors, in everyday applications requires in-depth studies of proxemics in Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) and novel methods of user interaction suitable for different distances. This paper presents a user study (N=32) that evaluates proxemics with a miniature quadrotor (92 mm wheelbase) from four directions (front, back, left, right) in a seated setting investigating preferred approach directions and distances in future home or workplace scenarios. The goal of this study is to determine if humans are willing to allow flying robots of that size and mechanical appearance to approach close enough to enable tactile interaction. Moreover, the participants' inclination to physically interact with the quadrotor is examined. Studies evaluating proxemics in HDI are highly dependent on repeatable results and actually flying robots. In most comparable studies, the quadrotors used did not fly freely or at all, but were moved, manually controlled, or flew barely repeatable trajectories due to unstable onboard navigation. Only few studies have used pose estimation systems that ensure smooth and reproducible trajectories and thus reliable findings of the studies. For this reason, in addition to the presented study and its results, an insight into the used testbed is provided, that also integrates full skeleton pose estimation rather than tracking participants with only a single marker.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"1275-1282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

无人驾驶飞行器(uav),特别是四旋翼飞行器,在日常应用中的自主性和存在性日益增加,需要深入研究人机交互(HDI)中的近距离学和适合不同距离的用户交互新方法。本文提出了一项用户研究(N=32),该研究评估了微型四旋翼(92毫米轴距)在座位设置下从四个方向(前、后、左、右)的接近行为,调查了未来家庭或工作场所场景中首选的接近方向和距离。这项研究的目的是确定人类是否愿意允许这种尺寸和机械外观的飞行机器人接近足够近的距离,以实现触觉互动。此外,参与者的倾向,物理互动与四旋翼进行了检查。评估HDI中的接近性的研究高度依赖于可重复的结果和实际飞行的机器人。在大多数类似的研究中,所使用的四旋翼机不能自由飞行或根本不能飞行,而是被移动,手动控制,或者由于机载导航不稳定而几乎无法重复飞行轨迹。只有少数研究使用姿态估计系统,以确保平滑和可重复的轨迹,从而可靠的研究结果。出于这个原因,除了提出的研究及其结果之外,还提供了对使用的测试平台的洞察,该测试平台还集成了完整的骨骼姿势估计,而不是仅使用单个标记跟踪参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Distances in Tactile Human-Drone Interaction
The increasing autonomy and presence of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), especially quadrotors, in everyday applications requires in-depth studies of proxemics in Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) and novel methods of user interaction suitable for different distances. This paper presents a user study (N=32) that evaluates proxemics with a miniature quadrotor (92 mm wheelbase) from four directions (front, back, left, right) in a seated setting investigating preferred approach directions and distances in future home or workplace scenarios. The goal of this study is to determine if humans are willing to allow flying robots of that size and mechanical appearance to approach close enough to enable tactile interaction. Moreover, the participants' inclination to physically interact with the quadrotor is examined. Studies evaluating proxemics in HDI are highly dependent on repeatable results and actually flying robots. In most comparable studies, the quadrotors used did not fly freely or at all, but were moved, manually controlled, or flew barely repeatable trajectories due to unstable onboard navigation. Only few studies have used pose estimation systems that ensure smooth and reproducible trajectories and thus reliable findings of the studies. For this reason, in addition to the presented study and its results, an insight into the used testbed is provided, that also integrates full skeleton pose estimation rather than tracking participants with only a single marker.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Birds of a Feather Flock Together: But do Humans and Robots? A Meta-Analysis of Human and Robot Personality Matching Responsiveness towards robot-assisted interactions among pre-primary children of Indian ethnicity Discrepancies between designs of robot communicative styles and their perceived assertiveness The Influence of Robot's Unexpected Behavior on Individual Cognitive Performance An Exploration of Accessible Remote Tele-operation for Assistive Mobile Manipulators in the Home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1