基于入院格拉斯哥昏迷评分的中、轻度颅脑损伤分类的再探讨

IF 0.2 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Indian Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768170
Ganesh Swaminathan, A. Abraham, T. Mani, M. Joseph
{"title":"基于入院格拉斯哥昏迷评分的中、轻度颅脑损伤分类的再探讨","authors":"Ganesh Swaminathan, A. Abraham, T. Mani, M. Joseph","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  We study the clinical relevance of classifying traumatic brain injury (TBI) into moderate and mild categories based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission with respect to the treatment intensity and 6-month mortality and morbidity rates. Methods  Analysis of patients from a prospectively maintained database admitted at a level I trauma center from 2013 to 2019 with an admission GCS score between 9 and 15 and a minimum follow-up of 6 months post-TBI was done to study the treatment intensity and 6-month morbidity and mortality rates for each GCS score from 9 to 15. Results  In all, 2,060 patients met the study criteria, of which 1,684 were males (81.7%). Road traffic accident was the most common cause of TBI (83.7%). There was a significant linear increase in the proportion of patients who had good outcomes with increasing GCS scores from 9 to 15 ( p ≤ 0.001). When the variables in each GCS score were compared with a GCS score of 15, there was an increase in the odds ratio of mortality and poor outcome with decreasing GCS scores ( p ≤ 0.001). Patients with a lower admission GCS score required more intense treatment in the form of surgery and ventilation ( p ≤ 0.00001). There was a higher incidence of pupillary asymmetry in patients with lower GCS scores ( p ≤ 0.00001). Conclusions  The classification of TBI patients into moderate and mild based on the GCS score at admission is not of any practical value, and TBI patients may be more usefully classified based on the admission GCS score into severe and not severe groups.","PeriodicalId":43198,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Classification of Moderate and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Based on the Admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score\",\"authors\":\"Ganesh Swaminathan, A. Abraham, T. Mani, M. Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1768170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective  We study the clinical relevance of classifying traumatic brain injury (TBI) into moderate and mild categories based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission with respect to the treatment intensity and 6-month mortality and morbidity rates. Methods  Analysis of patients from a prospectively maintained database admitted at a level I trauma center from 2013 to 2019 with an admission GCS score between 9 and 15 and a minimum follow-up of 6 months post-TBI was done to study the treatment intensity and 6-month morbidity and mortality rates for each GCS score from 9 to 15. Results  In all, 2,060 patients met the study criteria, of which 1,684 were males (81.7%). Road traffic accident was the most common cause of TBI (83.7%). There was a significant linear increase in the proportion of patients who had good outcomes with increasing GCS scores from 9 to 15 ( p ≤ 0.001). When the variables in each GCS score were compared with a GCS score of 15, there was an increase in the odds ratio of mortality and poor outcome with decreasing GCS scores ( p ≤ 0.001). Patients with a lower admission GCS score required more intense treatment in the form of surgery and ventilation ( p ≤ 0.00001). There was a higher incidence of pupillary asymmetry in patients with lower GCS scores ( p ≤ 0.00001). Conclusions  The classification of TBI patients into moderate and mild based on the GCS score at admission is not of any practical value, and TBI patients may be more usefully classified based on the admission GCS score into severe and not severe groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的探讨创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者入院时基于格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)对治疗强度、6个月死亡率和发病率进行中度和轻度分类的临床意义。方法分析2013年至2019年在一级创伤中心入院的患者的前瞻性维护数据库,入院时GCS评分在9至15之间,并在tbi后至少随访6个月,研究GCS评分在9至15之间的治疗强度和6个月的发病率和死亡率。结果符合研究标准的患者共2060例,其中男性1684例(81.7%)。道路交通事故是TBI最常见的原因(83.7%)。GCS评分从9分增加到15分,预后良好的患者比例呈显著的线性增加(p≤0.001)。当将每个GCS评分中的变量与GCS评分为15的变量进行比较时,死亡率和不良结局的比值比随着GCS评分的降低而增加(p≤0.001)。入院GCS评分较低的患者需要更强烈的手术和通气治疗(p≤0.00001)。GCS评分越低的患者瞳孔不对称发生率越高(p≤0.00001)。结论根据入院时GCS评分将TBI患者分为中度和轻度并无实用价值,根据入院时GCS评分将TBI患者分为重度和非重度组可能更为有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the Classification of Moderate and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Based on the Admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score
Abstract Objective  We study the clinical relevance of classifying traumatic brain injury (TBI) into moderate and mild categories based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission with respect to the treatment intensity and 6-month mortality and morbidity rates. Methods  Analysis of patients from a prospectively maintained database admitted at a level I trauma center from 2013 to 2019 with an admission GCS score between 9 and 15 and a minimum follow-up of 6 months post-TBI was done to study the treatment intensity and 6-month morbidity and mortality rates for each GCS score from 9 to 15. Results  In all, 2,060 patients met the study criteria, of which 1,684 were males (81.7%). Road traffic accident was the most common cause of TBI (83.7%). There was a significant linear increase in the proportion of patients who had good outcomes with increasing GCS scores from 9 to 15 ( p ≤ 0.001). When the variables in each GCS score were compared with a GCS score of 15, there was an increase in the odds ratio of mortality and poor outcome with decreasing GCS scores ( p ≤ 0.001). Patients with a lower admission GCS score required more intense treatment in the form of surgery and ventilation ( p ≤ 0.00001). There was a higher incidence of pupillary asymmetry in patients with lower GCS scores ( p ≤ 0.00001). Conclusions  The classification of TBI patients into moderate and mild based on the GCS score at admission is not of any practical value, and TBI patients may be more usefully classified based on the admission GCS score into severe and not severe groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Neurotrauma and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Homer's Poems Impact of Single Blast Exposure on Neuronal Damage and Protein Levels in the Rat Brain at Varying Pressures An Unusual Case of Teeth in Neck: An Interesting Case Report Cognitive Outcomes following Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Patient with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Techniques and Surgical Nuances of Management of Comminuted Fronto-Orbital Depressed Fractures: A Single-Surgeon Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1