预测2型糖尿病患者控制良好的HbA1c水平的行为风险评分

{"title":"预测2型糖尿病患者控制良好的HbA1c水平的行为风险评分","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetes Type 2 is chronic disease that can progress from simple hyperglycemia to severe complications. Many behavioral risks have been discovered for blood sugar prediction.\n\nObjective: To develop a simple behavioral risk scoring to predict well-controlled HbA1c level in diabetes type 2 patients.\n\nMaterials and Methods: A total of 140 diabetes type 2 patients were recruited. Patients were interviewed about behavioral factors affecting blood sugar in three months retrospectively. To develop the risk score, risk indicators measured at the time of recruitment were built by logistic regression. Regression coefficients were transformed into item scores and added up to a total score. A risk scoring scheme was developed from behavioral predictors: eating desserts and soft drinks, regular exercise and strict medication intake. The scoring scheme was applied in bootstrap internal validity test to test the model performance.\n\nResults: The scheme explained, by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), 91.6% (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) of being good diabetic control (HbA1c ≤7%) with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²=3.61; p=0.61). The likelihood ratio of being good diabetic control (scores greater than or equal to 1) and poor diabetic control (score lower than 1) were 3.83 (95% CI 2.69 to 5.46) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.21), respectively. When applied in bootstrap internal validity test, the score showed good performance with AuROC 88.7% (95% CI 0.81 to 0.93).\n\nConclusion: A simple and non-invasive scoring scheme of three predictors provides good prediction indices for being good and poor diabetic control patients. This scheme may help clinicians in order to take further appropriate action for diabetic control.\n\nKeywords: Diabetes type 2; HbA1c controlling level; Prediction; Risk scoring","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Diabetes Type 2 is chronic disease that can progress from simple hyperglycemia to severe complications. Many behavioral risks have been discovered for blood sugar prediction.\\n\\nObjective: To develop a simple behavioral risk scoring to predict well-controlled HbA1c level in diabetes type 2 patients.\\n\\nMaterials and Methods: A total of 140 diabetes type 2 patients were recruited. Patients were interviewed about behavioral factors affecting blood sugar in three months retrospectively. To develop the risk score, risk indicators measured at the time of recruitment were built by logistic regression. Regression coefficients were transformed into item scores and added up to a total score. A risk scoring scheme was developed from behavioral predictors: eating desserts and soft drinks, regular exercise and strict medication intake. The scoring scheme was applied in bootstrap internal validity test to test the model performance.\\n\\nResults: The scheme explained, by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), 91.6% (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) of being good diabetic control (HbA1c ≤7%) with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²=3.61; p=0.61). The likelihood ratio of being good diabetic control (scores greater than or equal to 1) and poor diabetic control (score lower than 1) were 3.83 (95% CI 2.69 to 5.46) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.21), respectively. When applied in bootstrap internal validity test, the score showed good performance with AuROC 88.7% (95% CI 0.81 to 0.93).\\n\\nConclusion: A simple and non-invasive scoring scheme of three predictors provides good prediction indices for being good and poor diabetic control patients. This scheme may help clinicians in order to take further appropriate action for diabetic control.\\n\\nKeywords: Diabetes type 2; HbA1c controlling level; Prediction; Risk scoring\",\"PeriodicalId\":17486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2型糖尿病是一种慢性疾病,可以从单纯的高血糖发展到严重的并发症。许多行为风险已被发现用于预测血糖。目的:建立一种简单的行为风险评分方法来预测2型糖尿病患者控制良好的HbA1c水平。材料与方法:共招募140例2型糖尿病患者。回顾性随访3个月,了解影响血糖的行为因素。为编制风险评分,采用logistic回归方法构建招聘时测量的风险指标。回归系数被转换成项目得分,并加起来成为总分。根据行为预测因素制定了风险评分方案:吃甜点和软饮料,定期锻炼和严格的药物摄入。将该计分方案应用于bootstrap内部效度检验,检验模型的性能。结果:通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AuROC),该方案解释了91.6% (95% CI 0.87 ~ 0.96)的糖尿病控制良好(HbA1c≤7%),校准良好(Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²=3.61;p = 0.61)。糖尿病控制良好(评分≥1)和糖尿病控制不良(评分低于1)的似然比分别为3.83 (95% CI 2.69 ~ 5.46)和0.11 (95% CI 0.05 ~ 0.21)。应用bootstrap内部效度检验时,得分的AuROC为88.7% (95% CI 0.81 ~ 0.93)。结论:简单、无创的三种预测指标评分方案为糖尿病控制好坏患者提供了较好的预测指标。该方案可以帮助临床医生采取进一步适当的措施来控制糖尿病。关键词:2型糖尿病;HbA1c控制水平;预测;风险评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients
Background: Diabetes Type 2 is chronic disease that can progress from simple hyperglycemia to severe complications. Many behavioral risks have been discovered for blood sugar prediction. Objective: To develop a simple behavioral risk scoring to predict well-controlled HbA1c level in diabetes type 2 patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 140 diabetes type 2 patients were recruited. Patients were interviewed about behavioral factors affecting blood sugar in three months retrospectively. To develop the risk score, risk indicators measured at the time of recruitment were built by logistic regression. Regression coefficients were transformed into item scores and added up to a total score. A risk scoring scheme was developed from behavioral predictors: eating desserts and soft drinks, regular exercise and strict medication intake. The scoring scheme was applied in bootstrap internal validity test to test the model performance. Results: The scheme explained, by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), 91.6% (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) of being good diabetic control (HbA1c ≤7%) with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²=3.61; p=0.61). The likelihood ratio of being good diabetic control (scores greater than or equal to 1) and poor diabetic control (score lower than 1) were 3.83 (95% CI 2.69 to 5.46) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.21), respectively. When applied in bootstrap internal validity test, the score showed good performance with AuROC 88.7% (95% CI 0.81 to 0.93). Conclusion: A simple and non-invasive scoring scheme of three predictors provides good prediction indices for being good and poor diabetic control patients. This scheme may help clinicians in order to take further appropriate action for diabetic control. Keywords: Diabetes type 2; HbA1c controlling level; Prediction; Risk scoring
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1