结合多光谱自适应小波去噪(MAWD)和无监督源计数算法(USCA)的新型生理信号去噪方法

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jer.2023.07.016
Zhen-Yu Wang , Ze-Rui Xiang , Jin-Yi Zhi , Tie-Cheng Ding , Rui Zou
{"title":"结合多光谱自适应小波去噪(MAWD)和无监督源计数算法(USCA)的新型生理信号去噪方法","authors":"Zhen-Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Ze-Rui Xiang ,&nbsp;Jin-Yi Zhi ,&nbsp;Tie-Cheng Ding ,&nbsp;Rui Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2023.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In order to improve the quality of physiological signals, a combined study of blind source separation and wavelet thresholding methods was conducted, resulting in the proposal of a multispectral adaptive wavelet denoising (MAWD) method. This method was employed in conjunction with an improved unsupervised source counting algorithm (USCA). To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, three methods were used to calculate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and root mean square error (RMSE): soft thresholding, hard thresholding, and adaptive thresholding. The results demonstrated that the proposed method exhibited strong applicability under soft thresholding. Specifically, compared to hard thresholding, the enhanced signal using soft thresholding showed an approximately 44.2% increase in SNR and a 28.8% decrease in RMSE, along with a 1.4% reduction in processing time. Moreover, when compared to adaptive thresholding, soft thresholding exhibited approximately 706% improvement in SNR, a 16.7% decrease in RMSE, and a 3.0% reduction in processing time. Multiple experiments were conducted to determine the optimal peak detection threshold range for USCA, which was found to be within the interval [0.001, 0.0001]. This range facilitated the separation of more sources, thereby enhancing the separation effectiveness and accuracy. To substantiate the effectiveness of the USCA method, tests were conducted on publicly available datasets of EMG, ECG, and EEG signals, all of which consistently demonstrated the advantages of this approach.</p></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><p>The authors do not have permission to share data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 175-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001773/pdfft?md5=565c2db9e7080e501555b457d5b16950&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723001773-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel physiological signal denoising method coupled with multispectral adaptive wavelet denoising(MAWD) and unsupervised source counting algorithm(USCA)\",\"authors\":\"Zhen-Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Ze-Rui Xiang ,&nbsp;Jin-Yi Zhi ,&nbsp;Tie-Cheng Ding ,&nbsp;Rui Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jer.2023.07.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In order to improve the quality of physiological signals, a combined study of blind source separation and wavelet thresholding methods was conducted, resulting in the proposal of a multispectral adaptive wavelet denoising (MAWD) method. This method was employed in conjunction with an improved unsupervised source counting algorithm (USCA). To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, three methods were used to calculate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and root mean square error (RMSE): soft thresholding, hard thresholding, and adaptive thresholding. The results demonstrated that the proposed method exhibited strong applicability under soft thresholding. Specifically, compared to hard thresholding, the enhanced signal using soft thresholding showed an approximately 44.2% increase in SNR and a 28.8% decrease in RMSE, along with a 1.4% reduction in processing time. Moreover, when compared to adaptive thresholding, soft thresholding exhibited approximately 706% improvement in SNR, a 16.7% decrease in RMSE, and a 3.0% reduction in processing time. Multiple experiments were conducted to determine the optimal peak detection threshold range for USCA, which was found to be within the interval [0.001, 0.0001]. This range facilitated the separation of more sources, thereby enhancing the separation effectiveness and accuracy. To substantiate the effectiveness of the USCA method, tests were conducted on publicly available datasets of EMG, ECG, and EEG signals, all of which consistently demonstrated the advantages of this approach.</p></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><p>The authors do not have permission to share data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 175-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001773/pdfft?md5=565c2db9e7080e501555b457d5b16950&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723001773-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001773\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高生理信号的质量,我们对盲源分离法和小波阈值法进行了综合研究,最终提出了一种多光谱自适应小波去噪(MAWD)方法。该方法与改进的无监督源计数算法(USCA)结合使用。为了评估所提出方法的有效性,使用了三种方法来计算信噪比(SNR)和均方根误差(RMSE):软阈值、硬阈值和自适应阈值。结果表明,所提出的方法在软阈值下具有很强的适用性。具体来说,与硬阈值法相比,使用软阈值法增强的信号的信噪比提高了约 44.2%,均方根误差降低了 28.8%,处理时间缩短了 1.4%。此外,与自适应阈值法相比,软阈值法的 SNR 提高了约 706%,RMSE 降低了 16.7%,处理时间缩短了 3.0%。为了确定 USCA 的最佳峰值检测阈值范围,我们进行了多次实验,发现阈值范围在 [0.001, 0.0001] 之间。这一范围有助于分离更多的信号源,从而提高分离效果和准确性。为了证实 USCA 方法的有效性,我们在公开的肌电图、心电图和脑电信号数据集上进行了测试,所有这些数据集都一致证明了这种方法的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel physiological signal denoising method coupled with multispectral adaptive wavelet denoising(MAWD) and unsupervised source counting algorithm(USCA)

In order to improve the quality of physiological signals, a combined study of blind source separation and wavelet thresholding methods was conducted, resulting in the proposal of a multispectral adaptive wavelet denoising (MAWD) method. This method was employed in conjunction with an improved unsupervised source counting algorithm (USCA). To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, three methods were used to calculate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and root mean square error (RMSE): soft thresholding, hard thresholding, and adaptive thresholding. The results demonstrated that the proposed method exhibited strong applicability under soft thresholding. Specifically, compared to hard thresholding, the enhanced signal using soft thresholding showed an approximately 44.2% increase in SNR and a 28.8% decrease in RMSE, along with a 1.4% reduction in processing time. Moreover, when compared to adaptive thresholding, soft thresholding exhibited approximately 706% improvement in SNR, a 16.7% decrease in RMSE, and a 3.0% reduction in processing time. Multiple experiments were conducted to determine the optimal peak detection threshold range for USCA, which was found to be within the interval [0.001, 0.0001]. This range facilitated the separation of more sources, thereby enhancing the separation effectiveness and accuracy. To substantiate the effectiveness of the USCA method, tests were conducted on publicly available datasets of EMG, ECG, and EEG signals, all of which consistently demonstrated the advantages of this approach.

Data Availability

The authors do not have permission to share data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Research
Journal of Engineering Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).
期刊最新文献
Improvement of energy saving and indoor air quality by using a spot mixing ventilation (SMV) system in a classroom Efficacy of geopolymerization for integrated bagasse ash and quarry dust in comparison to fly ash as an admixture: A comparative study Direct flame test performance of boards containing waste undersized pumice materials Bearing performance of diaphragm wall pile combination foundation under vertical and horizontal loads Predicting academic performance of learners with the three domains of learning data using neuro-fuzzy model and machine learning algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1