德国青年移民的网络政治参与:比较德裔东欧人和德裔土耳其人

V. Spaiser
{"title":"德国青年移民的网络政治参与:比较德裔东欧人和德裔土耳其人","authors":"V. Spaiser","doi":"10.4018/jep.2013010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the results of research on young immigrants’ political participation on the Internet in Germany. The research focuses on young people from Turkish and East European backgrounds. The interrelation between offline political activities and online political participation is explained and the differences between the two groups are examined. While young German Turks are particularly politically active Internet users, young German East Europeans are rather hesitant about using the Internet for political purposes. Statistical models show that young German Turks’ political Internet use is motivated by grievances, while young German East Europeans’ political Internet use is motivated by sentimental pessimism and world-weariness. DOI: 10.4018/jep.2013010101 2 International Journal of E-Politics, 4(1), 1-17, January-March 2013 Copyright © 2013, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. to understand differences in political online participation between these two immigrant groups. More concretely, the paper discusses three questions: 1) How do young German Turks and German East Europeans participate politically on the Internet and are there any significant differences in their Internet political participation? 2) What factors account for an increase in Internet political participation and are the effect mechanisms the same for German Turks and German East Europeans? 3) Do the influencing factors explain the differences in online political participation among young German Turks and German East Europeans? To answer these questions the paper provides statistical analyses on the basis of survey data collected among adolescents and young adults with – amongst others – East European and Turkish background. Young immigrants’ political online activities will be explored based on the sociological rational-choice theory and theoretical resource models, which have been adapted to explain political participation on the Internet. Statistical analyses will build upon these theoretical assumptions. Several researchers like Elias and Lemish (2008), Hugger (2009) and Kissau (2008) have claimed that the Internet plays an important role in empowering immigrants. The Internet gives them opportunities, such as finding information and an (informal) education. It is part of their socialization environment and may ease the arrival of immigrants in their new country. The Internet enhances the economic chances of people from immigrant backgrounds, supports communication, and, therefore, makes it easier for them to socialize with other people, both immigrants and non-immigrants. Studies also show that the Internet helps immigrants to build and sustain their transnational identities. They build support networks on the Internet and acquire social capital (Elias & Lemish, 2008; Goel, 2007; Hugger, 2009; Kissau, 2008). Studies also show that the Internet helps immigrants to build and sustain their transnational identities (Gonzales & Castro, 2007; Navarrete & Huerta, 2006). This strengthening and empowerment contributes to integration in their new home country (Kissau, 2008). One important part of integration is political integration, which includes granting people from immigrant backgrounds civil rights as well as political participation. Indeed, the Internet may play an important role in political participation. Kissau and Hunger (2009) claim that the Internet helps minority groups to draw attention to their political niche agendas. This is considered to be important because minority agendas are usually ignored due to the fact that public agenda providers (mainly the mass media) only issue mainstream agendas. Additionally, according to Kissau and Hunger (2009), the Internet contributes to the pluralization of public debates, as it allows minority groups to participate in political discourses. Kissau and Hunger (2009) have found some empirical support for their assumptions. Immigrants have built new political public spheres on the Internet and seize the opportunity to get involved in debates (Kissau & Hunger, 2009). On the Internet they can challenge the mainstream images of immigrants and struggle to be accepted as citizens with a political voice (Kissau & Hunger, 2009). The paper builds upon these findings and refines them further as it goes beyond merely describing how and for what purposes (young) immigrants use the Internet (politically). The focus of this paper lies rather on factors that have positive or negative effects on the likelihood that the Internet is used for political purposes, comparing two immigrant groups. In the next Section, theoretical assumptions on factors that influence young German Turks’ and German East Europeans’ political participation on the Internet will be provided first. The operationalization of the mentioned theoretical concepts is outlined in the endnotes. The data basis and statistical methods, used to answer the research questions based on specified theoretical considerations, will be briefly explained afterwards. Followed by different forms of young Germans Turks’ and German East Europeans’ Internet political participation will be discussed. Then statistical models derived from theoretical assumptions discussed previously, will be used to explain political 15 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \"Add to Cart\" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/young-immigrants-internetpolitical-participation/76892?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Communications and Social Science, InfoSciCivic Engagement, Sustainable Planning, and Crisis Response eJournal Collection, InfoSci-Communications, Online Engagement, and Media eJournal Collection. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2","PeriodicalId":13695,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. E Politics","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young Immigrants' Internet Political Participation in Germany: Comparing German East Europeans and German Turks\",\"authors\":\"V. Spaiser\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/jep.2013010101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the results of research on young immigrants’ political participation on the Internet in Germany. The research focuses on young people from Turkish and East European backgrounds. The interrelation between offline political activities and online political participation is explained and the differences between the two groups are examined. While young German Turks are particularly politically active Internet users, young German East Europeans are rather hesitant about using the Internet for political purposes. Statistical models show that young German Turks’ political Internet use is motivated by grievances, while young German East Europeans’ political Internet use is motivated by sentimental pessimism and world-weariness. DOI: 10.4018/jep.2013010101 2 International Journal of E-Politics, 4(1), 1-17, January-March 2013 Copyright © 2013, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. to understand differences in political online participation between these two immigrant groups. More concretely, the paper discusses three questions: 1) How do young German Turks and German East Europeans participate politically on the Internet and are there any significant differences in their Internet political participation? 2) What factors account for an increase in Internet political participation and are the effect mechanisms the same for German Turks and German East Europeans? 3) Do the influencing factors explain the differences in online political participation among young German Turks and German East Europeans? To answer these questions the paper provides statistical analyses on the basis of survey data collected among adolescents and young adults with – amongst others – East European and Turkish background. Young immigrants’ political online activities will be explored based on the sociological rational-choice theory and theoretical resource models, which have been adapted to explain political participation on the Internet. Statistical analyses will build upon these theoretical assumptions. Several researchers like Elias and Lemish (2008), Hugger (2009) and Kissau (2008) have claimed that the Internet plays an important role in empowering immigrants. The Internet gives them opportunities, such as finding information and an (informal) education. It is part of their socialization environment and may ease the arrival of immigrants in their new country. The Internet enhances the economic chances of people from immigrant backgrounds, supports communication, and, therefore, makes it easier for them to socialize with other people, both immigrants and non-immigrants. Studies also show that the Internet helps immigrants to build and sustain their transnational identities. They build support networks on the Internet and acquire social capital (Elias & Lemish, 2008; Goel, 2007; Hugger, 2009; Kissau, 2008). Studies also show that the Internet helps immigrants to build and sustain their transnational identities (Gonzales & Castro, 2007; Navarrete & Huerta, 2006). This strengthening and empowerment contributes to integration in their new home country (Kissau, 2008). One important part of integration is political integration, which includes granting people from immigrant backgrounds civil rights as well as political participation. Indeed, the Internet may play an important role in political participation. Kissau and Hunger (2009) claim that the Internet helps minority groups to draw attention to their political niche agendas. This is considered to be important because minority agendas are usually ignored due to the fact that public agenda providers (mainly the mass media) only issue mainstream agendas. Additionally, according to Kissau and Hunger (2009), the Internet contributes to the pluralization of public debates, as it allows minority groups to participate in political discourses. Kissau and Hunger (2009) have found some empirical support for their assumptions. Immigrants have built new political public spheres on the Internet and seize the opportunity to get involved in debates (Kissau & Hunger, 2009). On the Internet they can challenge the mainstream images of immigrants and struggle to be accepted as citizens with a political voice (Kissau & Hunger, 2009). The paper builds upon these findings and refines them further as it goes beyond merely describing how and for what purposes (young) immigrants use the Internet (politically). The focus of this paper lies rather on factors that have positive or negative effects on the likelihood that the Internet is used for political purposes, comparing two immigrant groups. In the next Section, theoretical assumptions on factors that influence young German Turks’ and German East Europeans’ political participation on the Internet will be provided first. The operationalization of the mentioned theoretical concepts is outlined in the endnotes. The data basis and statistical methods, used to answer the research questions based on specified theoretical considerations, will be briefly explained afterwards. Followed by different forms of young Germans Turks’ and German East Europeans’ Internet political participation will be discussed. Then statistical models derived from theoretical assumptions discussed previously, will be used to explain political 15 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \\\"Add to Cart\\\" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/young-immigrants-internetpolitical-participation/76892?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Communications and Social Science, InfoSciCivic Engagement, Sustainable Planning, and Crisis Response eJournal Collection, InfoSci-Communications, Online Engagement, and Media eJournal Collection. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2\",\"PeriodicalId\":13695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. E Politics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. E Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/jep.2013010101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. E Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jep.2013010101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文讨论了德国青年移民网络政治参与的研究结果。这项研究的重点是来自土耳其和东欧背景的年轻人。本文解释了线下政治活动与线上政治参与之间的相互关系,并分析了两者之间的差异。虽然年轻的德国土耳其人是政治上特别活跃的互联网用户,但年轻的德国东欧人对将互联网用于政治目的相当犹豫。统计模型显示,年轻的德裔土耳其人使用政治互联网的动机是不满,而年轻的德裔东欧人使用政治互联网的动机是感伤的悲观主义和厌世。DOI: 10.4018 /中。2013010101 2国际电子政治学报,4(1),1- 17,2013年1- 3月版权所有©2013,IGI Global。未经IGI Global书面许可,禁止以印刷或电子形式复制或分发。了解这两个移民群体在网上政治参与方面的差异。更具体地说,本文讨论了三个问题:1)德裔土耳其人和德裔东欧年轻人如何在互联网上参与政治,他们在互联网政治参与方面是否存在显著差异?2)是什么因素导致了网络政治参与的增加?对德裔土耳其人和德裔东欧人的影响机制是否相同?3)影响因素能否解释年轻的德裔土耳其人和德裔东欧人在网络政治参与方面的差异?为了回答这些问题,本文根据在东欧和土耳其背景的青少年和年轻人中收集的调查数据进行了统计分析。本文将基于社会学理性选择理论和理论资源模型来探讨青年移民的网络政治活动,这些理论已经被用来解释互联网上的政治参与。统计分析将以这些理论假设为基础。Elias和Lemish(2008)、Hugger(2009)和Kissau(2008)等几位研究人员声称,互联网在赋予移民权力方面发挥着重要作用。互联网给了他们机会,比如寻找信息和接受(非正式)教育。这是他们社会化环境的一部分,可能会缓解移民抵达新国家的压力。互联网增加了移民背景的人的经济机会,支持交流,因此,使他们更容易与其他人交往,无论是移民还是非移民。研究还表明,互联网帮助移民建立和维持他们的跨国身份。他们在互联网上建立支持网络并获得社会资本(Elias & Lemish, 2008;戈埃尔,2007;劈理,2009;Kissau, 2008)。研究还表明,互联网有助于移民建立和维持他们的跨国身份(Gonzales & Castro, 2007;Navarrete & Huerta, 2006)。这种强化和赋权有助于他们融入新祖国(Kissau, 2008)。融合的一个重要部分是政治融合,这包括给予移民背景的人公民权利和政治参与。事实上,互联网可能在政治参与中发挥重要作用。Kissau和Hunger(2009)声称,互联网有助于少数群体吸引对其政治利基议程的关注。这被认为是重要的,因为少数议程通常被忽视,因为公共议程提供者(主要是大众媒体)只发布主流议程。此外,根据Kissau and Hunger(2009)的研究,互联网有助于公共辩论的多元化,因为它允许少数群体参与政治话语。Kissau和Hunger(2009)为他们的假设找到了一些实证支持。移民在互联网上建立了新的政治公共领域,并抓住机会参与辩论(Kissau & Hunger, 2009)。在互联网上,他们可以挑战移民的主流形象,并努力被接受为具有政治声音的公民(Kissau & Hunger, 2009)。本文建立在这些发现的基础上,并进一步完善它们,因为它不仅仅是描述(年轻)移民如何以及出于什么目的使用互联网(政治)。本文的重点在于对互联网被用于政治目的的可能性有积极或消极影响的因素,比较两个移民群体。在下一节中,首先将对影响德裔土耳其青年和德裔东欧青年在互联网上政治参与的因素进行理论假设。在尾注中概述了上述理论概念的操作化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Young Immigrants' Internet Political Participation in Germany: Comparing German East Europeans and German Turks
This paper discusses the results of research on young immigrants’ political participation on the Internet in Germany. The research focuses on young people from Turkish and East European backgrounds. The interrelation between offline political activities and online political participation is explained and the differences between the two groups are examined. While young German Turks are particularly politically active Internet users, young German East Europeans are rather hesitant about using the Internet for political purposes. Statistical models show that young German Turks’ political Internet use is motivated by grievances, while young German East Europeans’ political Internet use is motivated by sentimental pessimism and world-weariness. DOI: 10.4018/jep.2013010101 2 International Journal of E-Politics, 4(1), 1-17, January-March 2013 Copyright © 2013, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. to understand differences in political online participation between these two immigrant groups. More concretely, the paper discusses three questions: 1) How do young German Turks and German East Europeans participate politically on the Internet and are there any significant differences in their Internet political participation? 2) What factors account for an increase in Internet political participation and are the effect mechanisms the same for German Turks and German East Europeans? 3) Do the influencing factors explain the differences in online political participation among young German Turks and German East Europeans? To answer these questions the paper provides statistical analyses on the basis of survey data collected among adolescents and young adults with – amongst others – East European and Turkish background. Young immigrants’ political online activities will be explored based on the sociological rational-choice theory and theoretical resource models, which have been adapted to explain political participation on the Internet. Statistical analyses will build upon these theoretical assumptions. Several researchers like Elias and Lemish (2008), Hugger (2009) and Kissau (2008) have claimed that the Internet plays an important role in empowering immigrants. The Internet gives them opportunities, such as finding information and an (informal) education. It is part of their socialization environment and may ease the arrival of immigrants in their new country. The Internet enhances the economic chances of people from immigrant backgrounds, supports communication, and, therefore, makes it easier for them to socialize with other people, both immigrants and non-immigrants. Studies also show that the Internet helps immigrants to build and sustain their transnational identities. They build support networks on the Internet and acquire social capital (Elias & Lemish, 2008; Goel, 2007; Hugger, 2009; Kissau, 2008). Studies also show that the Internet helps immigrants to build and sustain their transnational identities (Gonzales & Castro, 2007; Navarrete & Huerta, 2006). This strengthening and empowerment contributes to integration in their new home country (Kissau, 2008). One important part of integration is political integration, which includes granting people from immigrant backgrounds civil rights as well as political participation. Indeed, the Internet may play an important role in political participation. Kissau and Hunger (2009) claim that the Internet helps minority groups to draw attention to their political niche agendas. This is considered to be important because minority agendas are usually ignored due to the fact that public agenda providers (mainly the mass media) only issue mainstream agendas. Additionally, according to Kissau and Hunger (2009), the Internet contributes to the pluralization of public debates, as it allows minority groups to participate in political discourses. Kissau and Hunger (2009) have found some empirical support for their assumptions. Immigrants have built new political public spheres on the Internet and seize the opportunity to get involved in debates (Kissau & Hunger, 2009). On the Internet they can challenge the mainstream images of immigrants and struggle to be accepted as citizens with a political voice (Kissau & Hunger, 2009). The paper builds upon these findings and refines them further as it goes beyond merely describing how and for what purposes (young) immigrants use the Internet (politically). The focus of this paper lies rather on factors that have positive or negative effects on the likelihood that the Internet is used for political purposes, comparing two immigrant groups. In the next Section, theoretical assumptions on factors that influence young German Turks’ and German East Europeans’ political participation on the Internet will be provided first. The operationalization of the mentioned theoretical concepts is outlined in the endnotes. The data basis and statistical methods, used to answer the research questions based on specified theoretical considerations, will be briefly explained afterwards. Followed by different forms of young Germans Turks’ and German East Europeans’ Internet political participation will be discussed. Then statistical models derived from theoretical assumptions discussed previously, will be used to explain political 15 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/young-immigrants-internetpolitical-participation/76892?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Communications and Social Science, InfoSciCivic Engagement, Sustainable Planning, and Crisis Response eJournal Collection, InfoSci-Communications, Online Engagement, and Media eJournal Collection. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theorizing the Journalism Model of Disinformation and Hate Speech Propagation in a Nigerian Democratic Context Farming on Facebook, Camera-less Food Photography and a New Indian Pastoral A Possible Framework for Attention-Based Politics: A Field for Research The Potential of Interactive Negotiated Narratives in Rebuilding and Reimagining Northern Irish Society Citizen Engagement and Social Media: The Case of Mexican Presidential Candidacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1