WTO专家组,澳大利亚:关于适用于烟草制品和包装的商标、地理标志和其他普通包装要求的某些措施,WT/DS435/R, WT/DS441/R, WT/DS4

T. Gögh
{"title":"WTO专家组,澳大利亚:关于适用于烟草制品和包装的商标、地理标志和其他普通包装要求的某些措施,WT/DS435/R, WT/DS441/R, WT/DS4","authors":"T. Gögh","doi":"10.54648/leie2019011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case review concerns the long-awaited WTO Panel report in the Australia – Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging dispute, circulated to Members on 28 June 2018. In the first part, it examines the factual background of the case detailing Australia’s reasons for pursuing a legitimate public health objective in the form of tobacco plain packaging legislation as well as a brief summary of the other disputes arising from this measure. The second part discusses whether the measure adopted by Australia is a technical regulation that is ‘more traderestrictive than necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective taking account of the risks non-fulfilment would create’ pursuant to Article 2.2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Agreement. Lastly, it details the way in which the Panel applied its findings relating to Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement to Article 20 of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, pursuant to which ‘the use of a trademark during the course of trade shall not be unjustifiably encumbered by special requirements’.","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WTO Panel, Australia: CertainMeasures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging,WT/DS435/R, WT/DS441/R, WT/DS4\",\"authors\":\"T. Gögh\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/leie2019011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case review concerns the long-awaited WTO Panel report in the Australia – Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging dispute, circulated to Members on 28 June 2018. In the first part, it examines the factual background of the case detailing Australia’s reasons for pursuing a legitimate public health objective in the form of tobacco plain packaging legislation as well as a brief summary of the other disputes arising from this measure. The second part discusses whether the measure adopted by Australia is a technical regulation that is ‘more traderestrictive than necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective taking account of the risks non-fulfilment would create’ pursuant to Article 2.2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Agreement. Lastly, it details the way in which the Panel applied its findings relating to Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement to Article 20 of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, pursuant to which ‘the use of a trademark during the course of trade shall not be unjustifiably encumbered by special requirements’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2019011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2019011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本案复审涉及期待已久的WTO澳大利亚专家组报告——适用于烟草制品和包装争端的商标、地理标志和其他无装饰包装要求的某些措施,该报告于2018年6月28日分发给成员。在第一部分中,它审查了案件的事实背景,详细说明了澳大利亚以烟草素包装立法的形式追求合法的公共卫生目标的原因,并简要总结了这一措施引起的其他争端。第二部分讨论了澳大利亚采取的措施是否是一项技术法规,该法规“考虑到不履行将产生的风险,对实现合法目标的贸易限制大于必要”,符合技术贸易壁垒(TBT)协议第2.2条。最后,它详细说明了专家组如何将其关于《TBT协定》第2.2条的调查结果应用于《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(TRIPS)第20条,根据该条,“在贸易过程中商标的使用不得因特殊要求而受到不合理的阻碍”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WTO Panel, Australia: CertainMeasures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging,WT/DS435/R, WT/DS441/R, WT/DS4
This case review concerns the long-awaited WTO Panel report in the Australia – Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging dispute, circulated to Members on 28 June 2018. In the first part, it examines the factual background of the case detailing Australia’s reasons for pursuing a legitimate public health objective in the form of tobacco plain packaging legislation as well as a brief summary of the other disputes arising from this measure. The second part discusses whether the measure adopted by Australia is a technical regulation that is ‘more traderestrictive than necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective taking account of the risks non-fulfilment would create’ pursuant to Article 2.2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Agreement. Lastly, it details the way in which the Panel applied its findings relating to Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement to Article 20 of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, pursuant to which ‘the use of a trademark during the course of trade shall not be unjustifiably encumbered by special requirements’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1