最后边疆上的杂交:《星际迷航》中的生物功利主义

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Pub Date : 2021-09-18 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0293
Jackie Hogan, James M. Decker
{"title":"最后边疆上的杂交:《星际迷航》中的生物功利主义","authors":"Jackie Hogan, James M. Decker","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The long-lived Star Trek franchise illuminates the evolution of social priorities and anxieties over more than fifty years. Specifically, it provides a useful lens on shifting attitudes toward science, technology, diversity, and hybridity. This article suggests that Star Trek is grounded in what we call a bio-utilitarian ethos, that embraces techno-scientific changes if they contribute to the greater good but rejects them if they increase individual happiness at the expense of the whole. An examination of multiple forms of hybridity on the \"final frontier\" further reveals that the franchise has moved toward an increasingly apprehensive and pessimistic preoccupation with the technological and genetic enhancement of humanity. This shift reflects, and potentially shapes, attitudes toward real-world techno-scientific developments.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybridities on the Final Frontier: Bio-utilitarianism in Star Trek\",\"authors\":\"Jackie Hogan, James M. Decker\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The long-lived Star Trek franchise illuminates the evolution of social priorities and anxieties over more than fifty years. Specifically, it provides a useful lens on shifting attitudes toward science, technology, diversity, and hybridity. This article suggests that Star Trek is grounded in what we call a bio-utilitarian ethos, that embraces techno-scientific changes if they contribute to the greater good but rejects them if they increase individual happiness at the expense of the whole. An examination of multiple forms of hybridity on the \\\"final frontier\\\" further reveals that the franchise has moved toward an increasingly apprehensive and pessimistic preoccupation with the technological and genetic enhancement of humanity. This shift reflects, and potentially shapes, attitudes toward real-world techno-scientific developments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长久不衰的《星际迷航》系列电影揭示了五十多年来社会优先事项和焦虑的演变。具体来说,它提供了一个有用的视角来看待人们对科学、技术、多样性和混杂性的态度的转变。这篇文章表明,《星际迷航》是建立在我们所谓的生物功利主义精神基础上的,如果技术和科学的变化有助于更大的利益,我们就会拥抱它们,但如果它们以牺牲整体为代价来增加个人幸福,我们就会拒绝它们。对“最后的边疆”上多种形式的杂交的考察进一步揭示出,这部电影对人类的技术和基因增强的关注越来越令人担忧和悲观。这种转变反映并可能塑造人们对现实世界科技发展的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybridities on the Final Frontier: Bio-utilitarianism in Star Trek
abstract:The long-lived Star Trek franchise illuminates the evolution of social priorities and anxieties over more than fifty years. Specifically, it provides a useful lens on shifting attitudes toward science, technology, diversity, and hybridity. This article suggests that Star Trek is grounded in what we call a bio-utilitarian ethos, that embraces techno-scientific changes if they contribute to the greater good but rejects them if they increase individual happiness at the expense of the whole. An examination of multiple forms of hybridity on the "final frontier" further reveals that the franchise has moved toward an increasingly apprehensive and pessimistic preoccupation with the technological and genetic enhancement of humanity. This shift reflects, and potentially shapes, attitudes toward real-world techno-scientific developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
期刊最新文献
Retransmission of Culture through Literary Translation: Turkish–Ukrainian Interliterary Contact In the Castle of My Skin: (Re)Inscribing an African “Feminist” Identity in Changes and Faceless A Theory for Cultural Resistance: The Cases of L. M. Silko’s Ceremony and L. Erdrich’s Tracks Disjuncture as a Trope of Conjuncture in Sudeep Pakhrin’s Selected Poems Dostoevsky’s Philosophy: A Critical Overview of Its Interpretations and a Definition of Its Contradiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1