{"title":"平价医疗法案对新诊断的卡波西肉瘤患者保险状况的影响","authors":"V. Ramachandran","doi":"10.46889/jdr.2023.4204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) role in changing the insurance composition of patients diagnosed with many dermatological conditions, such as Kaposi Sarcoma (KS), has not been assessed.\n\nMethods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, which captures cancer data from nearly 40% of cases in the US was used to extract cases. Cases were subgrouped by Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Standard mean differences were used as the statistical measure with P-value <0.05 used for statistical significance.\n\nResults: 2,465 patients met the inclusion criteria. In patients newly diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma nationally before and after ACA implementation, the analysis showed there was no significant difference in the percentage of uninsured patients, Medicaid-insured patients, or privately insured patients. Pre- and post-ACA sub-analysis of patients newly diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma in states that expanded Medicaid showed: (1) significant decrease in the percentage of uninsured patients (-5.81% difference, 95% CI -9.58% to -2.04%, P <.05); (2) significant increase in the percentage of Medicaid-insured patients (+9.36% difference, 95% CI +0.35% to +18.37%, P <.05) and (3) no significant difference in the percent of privately insured patients (-3.54% difference, 95% CI -13.74% to +6.64%). Sub-analysis in non-expansion states showed no difference between the insurance subtypes.\n\nConclusion: Medicaid expansion played the largest role in reducing the percentage of uninsured patients newly diagnosed with KS. In states without Medicaid expansion, it is important that public health forces ensure adequate access to medications with services like the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program","PeriodicalId":15448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Insurance Status of Patients Newly Diagnosed With Kaposi Sarcoma\",\"authors\":\"V. Ramachandran\",\"doi\":\"10.46889/jdr.2023.4204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) role in changing the insurance composition of patients diagnosed with many dermatological conditions, such as Kaposi Sarcoma (KS), has not been assessed.\\n\\nMethods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, which captures cancer data from nearly 40% of cases in the US was used to extract cases. Cases were subgrouped by Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Standard mean differences were used as the statistical measure with P-value <0.05 used for statistical significance.\\n\\nResults: 2,465 patients met the inclusion criteria. In patients newly diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma nationally before and after ACA implementation, the analysis showed there was no significant difference in the percentage of uninsured patients, Medicaid-insured patients, or privately insured patients. Pre- and post-ACA sub-analysis of patients newly diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma in states that expanded Medicaid showed: (1) significant decrease in the percentage of uninsured patients (-5.81% difference, 95% CI -9.58% to -2.04%, P <.05); (2) significant increase in the percentage of Medicaid-insured patients (+9.36% difference, 95% CI +0.35% to +18.37%, P <.05) and (3) no significant difference in the percent of privately insured patients (-3.54% difference, 95% CI -13.74% to +6.64%). Sub-analysis in non-expansion states showed no difference between the insurance subtypes.\\n\\nConclusion: Medicaid expansion played the largest role in reducing the percentage of uninsured patients newly diagnosed with KS. In states without Medicaid expansion, it is important that public health forces ensure adequate access to medications with services like the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program\",\"PeriodicalId\":15448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46889/jdr.2023.4204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/jdr.2023.4204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:平价医疗法案(ACA)在改变被诊断患有许多皮肤病(如卡波西肉瘤(KS))的患者的保险构成方面的作用尚未得到评估。方法:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目收集了美国近40%病例的癌症数据,用于提取病例。病例按医疗补助扩张州和非扩张州分组。统计学方法以标准差为标准,p值<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:2465例患者符合纳入标准。在ACA实施前后,在全国范围内新诊断的卡波西肉瘤患者中,分析显示未参保患者、医疗补助参保患者和私人参保患者的百分比没有显著差异。在扩大医疗补助的州,对新诊断的卡波西肉瘤患者进行aca前和aca后的亚分析显示:(1)未参保患者的百分比显著下降(差异为-5.81%,95% CI为-9.58%至-2.04%,P < 0.05);(2)参保患者比例显著增加(差异为+9.36%,95% CI +0.35% ~ +18.37%, P < 0.05);(3)自费参保患者比例无显著差异(差异为-3.54%,95% CI -13.74% ~ +6.64%)。在非扩张状态的亚分析中,保险亚型之间没有差异。结论:扩大医疗补助在降低未参保的新诊断为KS的患者比例方面发挥了最大作用。在没有扩大医疗补助的州,重要的是公共卫生力量要确保通过瑞安·怀特艾滋病毒/艾滋病项目等服务获得足够的药物
Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Insurance Status of Patients Newly Diagnosed With Kaposi Sarcoma
Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) role in changing the insurance composition of patients diagnosed with many dermatological conditions, such as Kaposi Sarcoma (KS), has not been assessed.
Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, which captures cancer data from nearly 40% of cases in the US was used to extract cases. Cases were subgrouped by Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Standard mean differences were used as the statistical measure with P-value <0.05 used for statistical significance.
Results: 2,465 patients met the inclusion criteria. In patients newly diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma nationally before and after ACA implementation, the analysis showed there was no significant difference in the percentage of uninsured patients, Medicaid-insured patients, or privately insured patients. Pre- and post-ACA sub-analysis of patients newly diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma in states that expanded Medicaid showed: (1) significant decrease in the percentage of uninsured patients (-5.81% difference, 95% CI -9.58% to -2.04%, P <.05); (2) significant increase in the percentage of Medicaid-insured patients (+9.36% difference, 95% CI +0.35% to +18.37%, P <.05) and (3) no significant difference in the percent of privately insured patients (-3.54% difference, 95% CI -13.74% to +6.64%). Sub-analysis in non-expansion states showed no difference between the insurance subtypes.
Conclusion: Medicaid expansion played the largest role in reducing the percentage of uninsured patients newly diagnosed with KS. In states without Medicaid expansion, it is important that public health forces ensure adequate access to medications with services like the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program