J. P. Irmer, M. Kern, K. Schermelleh-engel, N. Semmer, D. Zapf
{"title":"压力导向任务分析工具(ISTA)","authors":"J. P. Irmer, M. Kern, K. Schermelleh-engel, N. Semmer, D. Zapf","doi":"10.1026/0932-4089/a000312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The Instrument for Stress-Oriented Task Analysis (ISTA, Instrument zur stressbezogenen Taetigkeitsanalyse) is a German, action–theory-based instrument to measure stressors and resources in the workplace. In order to examine the psychometric properties of the ISTA variables, we conducted a meta-analysis using the job demands–resources (JD-R) model for construct validation of the instrument. The meta-analysis consisted of a maximum of 58 independent data sets in 51 studies, of which 26 have been published. Based on 565 individual means and standard deviations, 506 reliabilities, and 4,730 correlation coefficients, meta-analytical information was computed. Overall, the instrument showed good psychometric properties: The scale means were close to the theoretical mean of the scales and reliabilities were acceptable to good. The validation hypotheses were examined by analyzing the correlations of ISTA variables (stressors and resources) with psychological strain and well-being. Our hypotheses were largely supported by the data: Stressors were positively related to strain and mostly negatively related to well-being, while resources were mostly positively related to well-being and partly negatively related to strain. Moderation analyses revealed that the two versions of the ISTA, the publication status, the proportion of women, and the industrial sector of the samples had little systematic impact on the means and reliabilities of most ISTA scales as well as on correlations between ISTA scales and of ISTA scales with scales measuring psychological strain and well-being.","PeriodicalId":44883,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Instrument for Stress-Oriented Task Analysis (ISTA)\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Irmer, M. Kern, K. Schermelleh-engel, N. Semmer, D. Zapf\",\"doi\":\"10.1026/0932-4089/a000312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The Instrument for Stress-Oriented Task Analysis (ISTA, Instrument zur stressbezogenen Taetigkeitsanalyse) is a German, action–theory-based instrument to measure stressors and resources in the workplace. In order to examine the psychometric properties of the ISTA variables, we conducted a meta-analysis using the job demands–resources (JD-R) model for construct validation of the instrument. The meta-analysis consisted of a maximum of 58 independent data sets in 51 studies, of which 26 have been published. Based on 565 individual means and standard deviations, 506 reliabilities, and 4,730 correlation coefficients, meta-analytical information was computed. Overall, the instrument showed good psychometric properties: The scale means were close to the theoretical mean of the scales and reliabilities were acceptable to good. The validation hypotheses were examined by analyzing the correlations of ISTA variables (stressors and resources) with psychological strain and well-being. Our hypotheses were largely supported by the data: Stressors were positively related to strain and mostly negatively related to well-being, while resources were mostly positively related to well-being and partly negatively related to strain. Moderation analyses revealed that the two versions of the ISTA, the publication status, the proportion of women, and the industrial sector of the samples had little systematic impact on the means and reliabilities of most ISTA scales as well as on correlations between ISTA scales and of ISTA scales with scales measuring psychological strain and well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000312\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
摘要压力导向任务分析仪器(ISTA, Instrument zur stressbezogenen taetigkeitsanalyze)是一种基于行动理论的德国工具,用于测量工作场所的压力源和资源。为了检验ISTA变量的心理测量特性,我们使用工作需求-资源(JD-R)模型进行了meta分析,以对该工具进行结构验证。荟萃分析包括51项研究中最多58个独立数据集,其中26项已发表。基于565个个体均值和标准差、506个信度和4730个相关系数,计算了meta分析信息。总体而言,该量表显示出良好的心理测量特性:量表均值接近理论均值,信度可接受至良好。通过分析ISTA变量(压力源和资源)与心理压力和幸福感的相关性来检验验证假设。我们的假设在很大程度上得到了数据的支持:压力源与压力呈正相关,与幸福感呈负相关,而资源与幸福感呈正相关,与压力呈部分负相关。适度分析表明,两个版本的ISTA、出版状况、女性比例和样本的工业部门对大多数ISTA量表的均值和信度以及ISTA量表与测量心理压力和幸福感的量表之间的相关性几乎没有系统影响。
The Instrument for Stress-Oriented Task Analysis (ISTA)
Abstract. The Instrument for Stress-Oriented Task Analysis (ISTA, Instrument zur stressbezogenen Taetigkeitsanalyse) is a German, action–theory-based instrument to measure stressors and resources in the workplace. In order to examine the psychometric properties of the ISTA variables, we conducted a meta-analysis using the job demands–resources (JD-R) model for construct validation of the instrument. The meta-analysis consisted of a maximum of 58 independent data sets in 51 studies, of which 26 have been published. Based on 565 individual means and standard deviations, 506 reliabilities, and 4,730 correlation coefficients, meta-analytical information was computed. Overall, the instrument showed good psychometric properties: The scale means were close to the theoretical mean of the scales and reliabilities were acceptable to good. The validation hypotheses were examined by analyzing the correlations of ISTA variables (stressors and resources) with psychological strain and well-being. Our hypotheses were largely supported by the data: Stressors were positively related to strain and mostly negatively related to well-being, while resources were mostly positively related to well-being and partly negatively related to strain. Moderation analyses revealed that the two versions of the ISTA, the publication status, the proportion of women, and the industrial sector of the samples had little systematic impact on the means and reliabilities of most ISTA scales as well as on correlations between ISTA scales and of ISTA scales with scales measuring psychological strain and well-being.