孔子会对杜威说什么?

Q2 Arts and Humanities Education and Culture Pub Date : 2020-07-09 DOI:10.5703/educationculture.36.1.0010
Yuhua Bu, Yuanyuan Zhu
{"title":"孔子会对杜威说什么?","authors":"Yuhua Bu, Yuanyuan Zhu","doi":"10.5703/educationculture.36.1.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Between 1919–1920, while giving a series of speeches in China, John Dewey raised a doubt about Chinese education: Can Chinese education cultivate children with independent consciousness? Based on the seven-year “Reciprocal Learning in Teacher Education and School Education between Canada and China” project, we have the answer to Dewey’s doubt. In the 1990s, Chinese education could not respond affirmatively to Dewey’s question, but after forty years of reform and development, Chinese education has taken a big step forward in cultivating children with independent consciousness. However, Canada’s school education is, at present, better at cultivating self-determined and independent children in daily life, organically integrating teaching knowledge and cultivating students, and encouraging the structured teaching characterized in the reciprocal learning project as “the forest and the trees.” The teaching framework of different disciplines in Chinese school education has more obvious constraints on education and teaching. Although the current Chinese education, from the grassroots to the government, has begun to try to break the shackles of the “discipline framework” and explore new possibilities, at the present time, it solely uses western concepts and ideological framework to conduct its own practice, especially with respect to Dewey’s experience theory. China needs to contribute its own distinctive educational concept and ideological framework, so it can truly “find a place in the world.”","PeriodicalId":37095,"journal":{"name":"Education and Culture","volume":"1 1","pages":"10 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Will Confucius Say to Dewey?\",\"authors\":\"Yuhua Bu, Yuanyuan Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/educationculture.36.1.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Between 1919–1920, while giving a series of speeches in China, John Dewey raised a doubt about Chinese education: Can Chinese education cultivate children with independent consciousness? Based on the seven-year “Reciprocal Learning in Teacher Education and School Education between Canada and China” project, we have the answer to Dewey’s doubt. In the 1990s, Chinese education could not respond affirmatively to Dewey’s question, but after forty years of reform and development, Chinese education has taken a big step forward in cultivating children with independent consciousness. However, Canada’s school education is, at present, better at cultivating self-determined and independent children in daily life, organically integrating teaching knowledge and cultivating students, and encouraging the structured teaching characterized in the reciprocal learning project as “the forest and the trees.” The teaching framework of different disciplines in Chinese school education has more obvious constraints on education and teaching. Although the current Chinese education, from the grassroots to the government, has begun to try to break the shackles of the “discipline framework” and explore new possibilities, at the present time, it solely uses western concepts and ideological framework to conduct its own practice, especially with respect to Dewey’s experience theory. China needs to contribute its own distinctive educational concept and ideological framework, so it can truly “find a place in the world.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":37095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Culture\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"10 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/educationculture.36.1.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/educationculture.36.1.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:1919-1920年间,杜威在中国发表了一系列演讲,对中国教育提出了质疑:中国教育能培养出具有独立意识的儿童吗?基于为期七年的“中加教师教育和学校教育互惠学习”项目,我们有了杜威质疑的答案。在20世纪90年代,中国教育还不能肯定地回答杜威的问题,但经过四十年的改革和发展,中国教育在培养具有独立意识的儿童方面迈出了一大步。而目前加拿大的学校教育更注重培养日常生活中自主独立的孩子,将教学知识与学生培养有机地结合起来,鼓励以“森林与树木”互惠学习项目为特征的结构化教学。中国学校教育中不同学科的教学框架对教育教学的约束更为明显。虽然目前中国的教育,从基层到政府,已经开始尝试打破“学科框架”的束缚,探索新的可能性,但目前来看,它仅仅是用西方的概念和思想框架来进行自己的实践,特别是在杜威的经验理论方面。中国需要贡献自己独特的教育理念和思想框架,这样才能真正“在世界上找到一席之地”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Will Confucius Say to Dewey?
Abstract:Between 1919–1920, while giving a series of speeches in China, John Dewey raised a doubt about Chinese education: Can Chinese education cultivate children with independent consciousness? Based on the seven-year “Reciprocal Learning in Teacher Education and School Education between Canada and China” project, we have the answer to Dewey’s doubt. In the 1990s, Chinese education could not respond affirmatively to Dewey’s question, but after forty years of reform and development, Chinese education has taken a big step forward in cultivating children with independent consciousness. However, Canada’s school education is, at present, better at cultivating self-determined and independent children in daily life, organically integrating teaching knowledge and cultivating students, and encouraging the structured teaching characterized in the reciprocal learning project as “the forest and the trees.” The teaching framework of different disciplines in Chinese school education has more obvious constraints on education and teaching. Although the current Chinese education, from the grassroots to the government, has begun to try to break the shackles of the “discipline framework” and explore new possibilities, at the present time, it solely uses western concepts and ideological framework to conduct its own practice, especially with respect to Dewey’s experience theory. China needs to contribute its own distinctive educational concept and ideological framework, so it can truly “find a place in the world.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Culture
Education and Culture Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Would Dewey See/Say Now? China’s Promise 1919 to 2019 A View of Democracy in and for China from a Deweyan Perspective What Will Confucius Say to Dewey? The Students’ Experience Evolution in Chinese Schools Educational Promise Amidst Authoritarian Ambition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1