规范企业家游说和说服:涉及国际会计准则理事会(IASB)修改征求意见稿的案例研究

Noriaki Okamoto
{"title":"规范企业家游说和说服:涉及国际会计准则理事会(IASB)修改征求意见稿的案例研究","authors":"Noriaki Okamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The dynamics of IFRS are a significant influence on regulators and accounting standard setters in many countries. Many previous studies on accounting standard setting have focused on comment letter submissions and analyzed the relationship between lobbying behavior and lobbyists’ attributes (e.g., Larson, 2008). However, how and to what extent each actor can participate effectively in the IASB's standard-setting process has not been thoroughly studied. This case study deals with this issue and contributes to the literature by introducing the theoretical perspective of norm entrepreneur actions during accounting standard setting. It investigates a case involving the modification of an IFRS exposure draft that did not reflect Japanese opinions. This study identifies two factors that appear to be crucial in relation to the IASB's final decision: the actions of Japanese norm entrepreneurs and their analogical persuasion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101074,"journal":{"name":"Research in Accounting Regulation","volume":"29 2","pages":"Pages 129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norm entrepreneur lobbying and persuasion: A case study involving the IASB's modification of an exposure draft\",\"authors\":\"Noriaki Okamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The dynamics of IFRS are a significant influence on regulators and accounting standard setters in many countries. Many previous studies on accounting standard setting have focused on comment letter submissions and analyzed the relationship between lobbying behavior and lobbyists’ attributes (e.g., Larson, 2008). However, how and to what extent each actor can participate effectively in the IASB's standard-setting process has not been thoroughly studied. This case study deals with this issue and contributes to the literature by introducing the theoretical perspective of norm entrepreneur actions during accounting standard setting. It investigates a case involving the modification of an IFRS exposure draft that did not reflect Japanese opinions. This study identifies two factors that appear to be crucial in relation to the IASB's final decision: the actions of Japanese norm entrepreneurs and their analogical persuasion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 129-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045717300322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Accounting Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045717300322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际财务报告准则的动态对许多国家的监管机构和会计准则制定者产生了重大影响。以往关于会计准则制定的许多研究侧重于意见书的提交,并分析了游说行为与游说者属性之间的关系(如Larson, 2008)。然而,每个行为主体如何以及在多大程度上有效参与国际会计准则理事会的准则制定过程尚未得到彻底研究。本案例研究探讨了这一问题,并通过引入规范企业家行为在会计准则制定过程中的理论视角,为文献做出了贡献。它调查了一个涉及修改国际财务报告准则征求意见稿的案件,该征求意见稿未反映日本的意见。本研究确定了两个似乎对IASB的最终决定至关重要的因素:日本规范企业家的行为及其类似的说服力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Norm entrepreneur lobbying and persuasion: A case study involving the IASB's modification of an exposure draft

The dynamics of IFRS are a significant influence on regulators and accounting standard setters in many countries. Many previous studies on accounting standard setting have focused on comment letter submissions and analyzed the relationship between lobbying behavior and lobbyists’ attributes (e.g., Larson, 2008). However, how and to what extent each actor can participate effectively in the IASB's standard-setting process has not been thoroughly studied. This case study deals with this issue and contributes to the literature by introducing the theoretical perspective of norm entrepreneur actions during accounting standard setting. It investigates a case involving the modification of an IFRS exposure draft that did not reflect Japanese opinions. This study identifies two factors that appear to be crucial in relation to the IASB's final decision: the actions of Japanese norm entrepreneurs and their analogical persuasion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Value relevance of customer-related intangible assets Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K. Financial statement comparability and segment disclosure The mitigation of high-growth-related accounting distortions after sarbanes-oxley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1