Muiderkring面具后面:Roemer Visscher的新肖像(1547-1620)

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 ART OUD HOLLAND Pub Date : 2018-08-21 DOI:10.1163/18750176-13101004
Lieke van Deinsen
{"title":"Muiderkring面具后面:Roemer Visscher的新肖像(1547-1620)","authors":"Lieke van Deinsen","doi":"10.1163/18750176-13101004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authenticity of the portrait of the Amsterdam poet Roemer Pieterszoon Visscher (1547-1620)-depicted as an old man with a beard and distinctive hat-has been a subject of debate ever since it was printed in Jacobus Scheltema's Anna en Maria Tesselschade, de dochters van Roemer Visscher (1808).Although the portrait formed the basis for the likeness of Roemer Visscher in popular nineteenth-century depictions of the mythical Muiderkring,its accuracy was quickly put into question.In 1887, the matter resulted in a heated argument between Joseph Alberdingk Thijm (1820-1889) and Nicolaas de Roever (1850-1893) in the journal De Amsterdammer. The latter suspected that the iconic portrait was one of many historical falsifications of Jan Stolker (1724-1785) and was thereafter falsely incorporated into contemporary images that featured literary and intellectual frontrunners of the nation's Golden Age. According to De Roever,a far more likely representation of the seventeenth-century poet and his coat of arms was included on the militia piece Schutters van de compagnie van kapitein Egbert Vinck (1586).Unfortunately,the painting was lost and the composition survived only through a drawing by Jacob Colijn from almost a century later.By that time only a sketchy en profil portrait of Roemer Visscher was available. Due to a lack of conclusive evidence, the dispute eventually ended in an impasse.Although later research supported De Roever's suspicions and rejected the well-known portrait of Roemer Visscher as an accurate likeness, knowledge about the real portrait of the popular poet was still limited. However,a long lost early eighteenth-century portrait by Arnoud van Halen (1683-1732) sheds new light on the subject matter. The small oval painting was part of the so-called Panpoeticon Batavum,an eighteenth-century collection of author's portraits placed in a wooden cabinet,which features the highlights of Dutch literary and intellectual history. By presenting this portrait of Roemer Visscher,we can now,for the first time, connect the face with the words of one of the leading early modern Dutch poets.","PeriodicalId":39579,"journal":{"name":"OUD HOLLAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achter het masker van de Muiderkring: Een nieuw portret voor Roemer Visscher (1547-1620)\",\"authors\":\"Lieke van Deinsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18750176-13101004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authenticity of the portrait of the Amsterdam poet Roemer Pieterszoon Visscher (1547-1620)-depicted as an old man with a beard and distinctive hat-has been a subject of debate ever since it was printed in Jacobus Scheltema's Anna en Maria Tesselschade, de dochters van Roemer Visscher (1808).Although the portrait formed the basis for the likeness of Roemer Visscher in popular nineteenth-century depictions of the mythical Muiderkring,its accuracy was quickly put into question.In 1887, the matter resulted in a heated argument between Joseph Alberdingk Thijm (1820-1889) and Nicolaas de Roever (1850-1893) in the journal De Amsterdammer. The latter suspected that the iconic portrait was one of many historical falsifications of Jan Stolker (1724-1785) and was thereafter falsely incorporated into contemporary images that featured literary and intellectual frontrunners of the nation's Golden Age. According to De Roever,a far more likely representation of the seventeenth-century poet and his coat of arms was included on the militia piece Schutters van de compagnie van kapitein Egbert Vinck (1586).Unfortunately,the painting was lost and the composition survived only through a drawing by Jacob Colijn from almost a century later.By that time only a sketchy en profil portrait of Roemer Visscher was available. Due to a lack of conclusive evidence, the dispute eventually ended in an impasse.Although later research supported De Roever's suspicions and rejected the well-known portrait of Roemer Visscher as an accurate likeness, knowledge about the real portrait of the popular poet was still limited. However,a long lost early eighteenth-century portrait by Arnoud van Halen (1683-1732) sheds new light on the subject matter. The small oval painting was part of the so-called Panpoeticon Batavum,an eighteenth-century collection of author's portraits placed in a wooden cabinet,which features the highlights of Dutch literary and intellectual history. By presenting this portrait of Roemer Visscher,we can now,for the first time, connect the face with the words of one of the leading early modern Dutch poets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OUD HOLLAND\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OUD HOLLAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-13101004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUD HOLLAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-13101004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Achter het masker van de Muiderkring: Een nieuw portret voor Roemer Visscher (1547-1620)
The authenticity of the portrait of the Amsterdam poet Roemer Pieterszoon Visscher (1547-1620)-depicted as an old man with a beard and distinctive hat-has been a subject of debate ever since it was printed in Jacobus Scheltema's Anna en Maria Tesselschade, de dochters van Roemer Visscher (1808).Although the portrait formed the basis for the likeness of Roemer Visscher in popular nineteenth-century depictions of the mythical Muiderkring,its accuracy was quickly put into question.In 1887, the matter resulted in a heated argument between Joseph Alberdingk Thijm (1820-1889) and Nicolaas de Roever (1850-1893) in the journal De Amsterdammer. The latter suspected that the iconic portrait was one of many historical falsifications of Jan Stolker (1724-1785) and was thereafter falsely incorporated into contemporary images that featured literary and intellectual frontrunners of the nation's Golden Age. According to De Roever,a far more likely representation of the seventeenth-century poet and his coat of arms was included on the militia piece Schutters van de compagnie van kapitein Egbert Vinck (1586).Unfortunately,the painting was lost and the composition survived only through a drawing by Jacob Colijn from almost a century later.By that time only a sketchy en profil portrait of Roemer Visscher was available. Due to a lack of conclusive evidence, the dispute eventually ended in an impasse.Although later research supported De Roever's suspicions and rejected the well-known portrait of Roemer Visscher as an accurate likeness, knowledge about the real portrait of the popular poet was still limited. However,a long lost early eighteenth-century portrait by Arnoud van Halen (1683-1732) sheds new light on the subject matter. The small oval painting was part of the so-called Panpoeticon Batavum,an eighteenth-century collection of author's portraits placed in a wooden cabinet,which features the highlights of Dutch literary and intellectual history. By presenting this portrait of Roemer Visscher,we can now,for the first time, connect the face with the words of one of the leading early modern Dutch poets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OUD HOLLAND
OUD HOLLAND Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The periodical Oud Holland is the oldest surviving art-historical periodical in the world. Founded by A.D. de Vries and N. der Roever in 1883, it has appeared virtually without interruption ever since. It is entirely devoted to the visual arts in the Netherlands up to the mid-nineteenth century and has featured thousands of scholarly articles by Dutch and foreign authors, including numerous pioneering art-historical studies. Almost from the magazine’s inception, the publication of archival information concerning Dutch artists has played an important role. From 1885 to his death in 1946, the renowned art historian Dr. Abraham Bredius set a standard of excellence for Oud Holland.
期刊最新文献
Frans Hals and Gerrit Bleker: A joint collaboration on a fragmented family portrait (1623-1625) From fields of rye to Eyckian grandeur: New biographical data on Pieter Cristus (c. 1420-1475) The symbols of the four evangelists: A newly discovered modello for Jan Boeckhorst’s Snyders triptych (c. 1654) ‘Diverses veues deseignees en la Ville de Rome’: Herman van Swanevelt’s 1650 print series for Gédéon Tallemant des Réaux Under the skin: Portraits by Abraham de Vries (c. 1590-1649/50) recognised and revealed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1